My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3A - Minutes Approval
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-10/11/04Mtg
>
Item 3A - Minutes Approval
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:07:20 PM
Creation date
10/6/2004 3:09:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
10/11/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Meisner pointed out that under Roberts' Rules of Order a councilor could still move to postpone or table <br />the item if the discussion extended to a late hour. <br /> <br />Ms. Solomon arrived at 5:35 p.m. <br /> <br /> The motion carried, 6:1; Ms. Solomon voting in opposition. <br /> <br /> Ms. Bettman moved, seconded by Mr. Poling, to accept the amended language in <br /> Section 1.06 Public Hearings. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman said she did not object to the amended language, but it seemed out of place in 1.06 Public <br />Hearings because the council generally did not consider the motion immediately following the hearing; <br />rather, testimony from the hearing was discussed and then a motion was considered. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly commented that the need for the language was raised as a result of a situation in which a motion <br />to direct staff was placed on the table immediately following a hearing and there was concern that at least <br />one full round of comments on the hearing should occur before a motion was considered. He suggested <br />taking the amended language out of the first paragraph of 1.06 Public Hearings and establishing it as a <br />second paragraph in that section and changing the term "initial comment period" to "initial round of <br />comments" to clarify the intent. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman accepted Mr. Kelly's suggestions as a friendly amendment to the motion. There were no <br />objections. <br /> <br /> The motion carried, 7:0. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman pointed out that Section 6. 03 Standing Advisory Bodies to the Council still included a <br />reference to the Citizen Involvement Committee, even though that committee had been abolished. <br /> <br /> Ms. Bettman moved, seconded by Mr. Poling, to delete the reference to the Citizen <br /> Involvement Committee in 6. 03 Standing Advisory Bodies to the Council and <br /> change the term "five standing advisory bodies" to "four standing advisory bodies." <br /> The motion carried, 7:0. <br /> <br /> Ms. Bettman moved, seconded by Mr. Poling, to accept the amended language in <br /> Section 7. 02 Other Meeting Guideline. The motion carried, 7:0. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson arrived at 5:40 p.m. <br /> <br />City Attorney Glenn Klein referred to his memorandum dated April 1, 2004, addressing removal of Section <br />9. 03 Attending Conferences, Other Meetings, pending further discussion by the council. He said that the <br />section was removed because a question was raised regarding whether the council had the ability to instruct <br />elected officials on how to vote or what to say when they attended another meeting. He said the memoran- <br />dum set forth the issues related to that question. He suggested the council discuss how it wished to deal with <br />the issue and a motion could be crafted to put the section back into the operating agreements in accordance <br />with the council's direction. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council September 8, 2004 Page 2 <br /> Process Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.