Item 3A - Minutes Approval - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mr. Kelly commented that the question arose in part because a concern that if a councilor lobbied, he or she represented the adopted position of the body. He said that the section, as currently written, was directed toward conferences and his concern was with participation in intergovernmental bodies such as the Metropolitan Policy Committee (MPC). He expressed an interest in receiving draft language that set forth guidelines reflecting an adopted council position in votes for a specific list of intergovernmental bodies. Ms. Bettman agreed with Mr. Kelly's remarks. She said her concern was focused on the budgetary authority of a body, such as the MPC, and on the League of Oregon Cities (LOC) and adoption of policies by those bodies that were counter to official City policy. She said if the approach was to determine that a member of an LOC committee was not representing the City, the City should no longer fund that activity. She indicated that the first paragraph of 9.03 Attending Conferences, Other Meetings was acceptable. Ms. Taylor agreed that the council should discuss the relevant issues and direct its MPC representatives on how to vote. She said that if the council had an opportunity to review resolutions of the LOC or National League of Cities (NLC) prior to adoption, it would be appropriate to discuss them and ensure that the council's views were represented. She said that participation on NLC committees, to which members are appointed by the LOC president, was a different situation, and a councilor did not represent the City in that instance. Ms. Nathanson noted her objection to removal of 9. 03 Attending Conferences, Other Meetings at an earlier meeting and said there was more protection for the council with the section in place than with it removed without replacement language. She suggested reinstatement of the section until revised language was approved by the council. Regarding the MPC, she commented that on occasion one of the council's representatives had made statements contrary to the majority position. She said that suggestions for revised language would require that both representatives on the MPC express the same positions and cast the same votes and encouraged the council to discuss whether the representatives should present differing points of views and ideas or present a unified position. She agreed with Ms. Taylor's comments regarding participa- tion on NLC committees and agreed that members did not represent the City, although to the extent that issues were known before a meeting, those could be shared with other councilors via email or as information items on the council's agenda. Mr. Pap6 said he agreed with Mr. Kelly and Ms. Bettman that the council's MPC representatives should adhere to the council's position on issues; however, councilors were also representatives of their wards and constituents and had their own consciences. He said with regard to LOC and NLC committee representation it was fine to ask members to express the will of the council where possible, but vote their own conscience. He did not feel it was feasible for the council to attempt to deliberate on all of the resolutions that went before the MPC, LOC, and NLC and felt voting should be left to a councilor's best judgment. Mr. Meisner agreed with Ms. Bettman's remarks and said the issue for him went beyond budgetary authority. He commented that LOC and NLC appointments were made for individuals, but LOC and NLC memberships were expensive and paid for by the City. He said that the Council Committee on Intergovern- mental Relations (CCIGR) had recently expressed frustration that while the City's priorities were communi- cated to LOC, the LOC legislative lobbyists seldom presented those priorities. He stated it was extremely important that councilors and the mayor consistently represent the City's position during their participation in LOC activities, along with their individual opinions. He said that where budgetary authority was concerned, as with the MPC, it was even more important to represent the City's policies. He said he would like to see council policy expressed, if relevant on a particular issue, whenever a councilor is participating in MINUTES--Eugene City Council September 8, 2004 Page 3 Process Session