Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ""'III <br />e 3G2 <br /> 10/26/70 <br />I ; 4. Btn Gilham Rod & Balfour St and btn Holly <br /> ,,- -- ~"':-, <br /> St. and Terresa St. Lat 0.0315/sq ft <br /> Levy 0.005 0 <br /> D & D Backhoe 945.00 <br /> C H Lyons 1,060.00 <br /> Shur-way Contractors 1,063.75 <br /> Wildish Const. Co. 1,065.00 <br /> Fred Stubbert 1,465.00 <br /> Cascade Ditching Service 1,472.50 COMPLETION DATE: 12/7/70 <br /> 5. Btn. 11th Avenue & 12th from alley <br /> W. of Chambers to Grant <br /> C. H,. Lyons 855.00 ~if,0% to be paid 256.50 0 <br /> D & D. Backhoe Service 872.00 by D & D Battery Co. <br /> Shur-Way Contractors 1,209.24 <br />e Wildish Const. Co. 1,285.00 <br /> Fred Stubbert 1,430.40 <br /> Cascade Ditching Service 1,446.70 COMPLETION DATE: 12/7/70 <br /> Opened October 20, 1970: <br /> SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER <br />I 6. Btn Pearl St. and High St. from CONTRACT COST <br /> 8th Avenue to 11th Avenue <br /> Basic Bid Alternate Bid <br /> Basic Bid W/alternate w/alternate Alternate <br /> Wildish Const. Co. 33,096.25 ~~,639. 25 ~6 ,Sli?: 76 . 50,140.75 <br /> D & D Backhoe Servo 331;t€i34. 23 . 36 ,126-:~-' 4,).'"";104. 90"~'- 44,275.30 <br /> . Budge"ted ' -> 43,000'.00 <br /> ---.~:_- ~ _::.;_n -f .~",-?j:..'::4-~'":~~'~~-:':"~","--_......,-__ . -. ,-.. .,....~---,.,--..-..,. ----~ Eng. Est. 30,000.00 <br /> _ _....._~-..,... ~..-~.r~_. ..~ ,-, - <br /> COMPLETION DATE: 4/1/71 <br /> Public Works Department recommends approval of award to low bidder in all those listed above. <br /> I, <br /> Mr. McDonald moved seconded by Mr. Teague that approval be given to award of bid in Items 1 through <br /> 6 listed above. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the motion.d~~~ie9~ <br /> COMMITTEE REPORTS <br /> , ~~~~:~Items on which discussion or action will be required: <br /> ,I <br /> I. State Street Area, Water User Charge - City Manager read a letter fpom Wanda Miller, <br /> representing the Citizens Advisory Committee, requesting a variance from a $60.00 water <br /> user charge. Cnar.ges levied in connection with sewer assessment and water meter were <br />I cited, and they said this added charge wouldbbe an unfair purden. <br /> City Manager said the staff believed this charge to be justified, but that various means <br /> had been investigated to attempt to ease this burden for the residents of the State <br /> Street area. It is recommended that the charge be collected with the regular water <br /> user bills over a period of thirty months, by increasing the monthly charge to $4.00 <br /> per month for that period of time. <br />e John Porter, Planning Director, said his office had been working with Eugene Renewal <br /> Agency to attempt to include this charge in low interest loans for those who are <br /> eligible. <br /> The City Manager outlined the basis of this charge, and that it is felt to be equitable. <br /> City Council discussed reasons for the charge, revenue received and means for collection. <br /> Further action will be taken at the regular meeting. <br /> City Manager explained this request and reasons the city instigated the charge. ' He said the staff <br /> had discussed the matter and concluded that the charge could be collected at the,fa-ee:ef $2.00 per .-. <br /> month, which would ease the burden on the property owner. A memo was received from the Housing Expe~>,:~ <br /> diter which said the charge could be included in loans received by property owners. <br /> Mrs. Wanda Miller, chairman of the State Street Advisory Committee, said they had not been previously <br />I notified of this ordinance. She outlined charges residents in the area have for improvements, and <br /> that this added burden would work a hardship on those with fixed incomes. <br /> Mr. Cecil McCranie, 2093 Minnesota, expressed the feeling of the residents that this charge was <br /> unfair and placed andundue burden on them. <br /> The City Manager reminded the Council that, after this area came into the city, the Council did not <br /> proceed to install sewers in the area immediately because they were concerned about the financial <br /> impact on the people in the area. It was only after extensive requests from the people in the area <br />e to proceed that word was given to go ahead with the project. There was no question that the area <br /> 10/26/70 - 2 <br /> ...,j <br />