Laserfiche WebLink
Goals 16 through 19 (Estuarine Resources, Coastal Shorelands, Beaches and Dunes, and <br /> Ocean Resources): <br /> <br />There are no coastal, ocean, estuarine, or beach and dune resources related to the property or involved <br />in the amendment. Therefore, these goals are not relevant and the amendment will not affect <br />compliance with Goals 16 through 19. <br /> <br /> (b) Applicable provisions of the Metro Plan. <br /> <br />Map Consistency: <br /> <br />The Metro Plan Diagram currently in effect (the 1987 "blob" map) shows that the subject site is <br />located in an area where commercial and low density residential designations meet. Based on <br />comparisons to nearby landmarks, such as the railroad right-of-way, at.least part of the subject site is <br />within the commercial designation. Generalized designation areas are an intentional feature of the <br />1987 "blob" Metro Plan Diagram causing the final determination of certain sites on the fringe of <br />designations to be ascertained in concert with refinement plan maps and policies. <br /> <br />In a Second Supplement to Application Materials submitted by the applicant's representative on <br />August 30, 2004, the applicant asserts that the subject site is already designated commercial.. The <br />applicant bases this assertion on the Eugene City Council's April 26, 2004, adoption of an updated <br />diagram. While the council did adopt a diagram that shows the subject property designated as <br />commercial, Council's adoption of the updated diagram is irrelevant to this pending application. The <br />updated diagram is not in effect because it has not yet been acknowledged by the State and has been <br />appealed by the Home Builders Association, who are also represented by this applicant's legal counsel. <br />As such, the 1987 "blob" map remains in effect, not the updated diagram adopted by the Council in <br />April, 2004. In these circumstances, the City has been consistent in its position that, until the new <br />diagram is in effect, the updated diagram has no relevance to pending applications; decisions must be <br />based on the Metro Plan Diagram currently in effect, which is the 1987 "blob" map. <br /> <br />Given the apparent mixed designation for the site, compliance with the Metro Plan Diagram can be <br />determined only with simultaneous evaluation of the Laurel Hill Refinement Plan, as found below. <br /> <br />Compliance with Policies: <br /> <br />One must look to both Residential and Economic policies, as well as other policies, within the Metro <br />Plan, to determine how those policies guide the designation of the subject site. The applicant's <br />submitted materials describes the site in detail, providing photographs, maps of the available <br />development area, and a written narrative discussing the merits, and particularly the weaknesses, of the <br />property as a development site for residential use. Although the applicant's narrative addresses <br />policies, recommendations and goals, this review is limited to evaluating those policies that are <br />mandatory, as opposed to those that encourage or recommend certain action. <br /> <br /> Residential Land Use and Housing Element <br /> Density, Policy A. 13 <br /> <br /> Increase overall residential density in the metropolitan area by creating more opportunities for <br /> effectively designed in-fill, redevelopment and mixed use while considering impacts of <br /> increased density on historic, existing and future neighborhoods. <br /> <br />Planning Division Staff Report 7 September 2004 Page 8 of 13 <br />(RA 04-1 and Z 04-4) <br /> 10 <br /> <br /> <br />