My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 5 - PH on Laurel Hill Plan
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-11/08/04Mtg
>
Item 5 - PH on Laurel Hill Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:47:57 PM
Creation date
11/4/2004 8:59:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/8/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
474
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Larson Property <br /> Traffic Impact Study Page <br /> <br /> Plan specifies that unsignalized intersections must operate at level of service (LOS) "E" or better. For <br /> those movements that are found to exceed the mobility standards under the current plan designation, the <br /> proposed plan amendment will require mitigation if it further degrades the movement. The mitigation <br /> must bring the V/C back to the level of the current plan designation. <br /> <br /> d. Existing Level of Service <br /> <br />For existing 2003 conditions, all intersections are stop controlled. The Highway Capacity Manual <br />(HCM) defines the methods by which level-of-service (LOS) is calculated in this analysis. For <br />unsignalizcd intersections, only the LOS on approaches where movements are required to STOP or yield <br />are reported. The Highway Capacity Manual Soi~are (HCM2000 v.4.1 d) was used to evaluate the <br />operation of all study intersections. The existing peak hour factors (PHF) from the traffic counts were <br />used. The volume to capacity ratio (V/C), the level of service (LOS), and the 95t~ percentile queue <br />lengths are reported. The rePorted queue length is in passenger cars, assuming 25 feet/car and rounded <br />up in all cases. The right tums permitted without stopping were coded as flared right-turns from through <br />lanes with a 2.0 second gap acceptance. The intersections were realigned in the model so that the <br />STOPPED movements oppose each other and the gap acceptance values reassigned to the actual <br />movement values. The results of the analyses are shoTM in Table 1 and the worksheets can be found in <br />Appendix C. <br /> <br />Table 1: 2003 Existing Peak ltour LOS Analysis <br /> <br /> AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour <br /> Inters ction <br /> Movement ~ V/C LOS 95th% <br /> Queue WC LOS Queu <br /> Gl nwo d Blvd. @ I-5 NB Ramps <br /> Southbound Left turn 0.14 A 1 0.25 A 1 <br /> Westbound Movement 0.19 B 1 0.15 * C 1 <br /> Gl nw dDr. @l-SSBRamps <br /> Southbound Left turn 0.30 A 2 0.24 A 1 <br /> Westbound Movements 0.15 B 1 0.26 C 2 <br /> Glenwood Blvd. @ Glenwood Dr. <br /> Northbound Movements 0.38 C 2 0.26 C 2 <br /> Southbound Left turn 0.07 A I 0.11 A 1 <br /> Westbound Left tum 0.29 A 2 0.24 A 1 <br /> Moon Mountain Dr. @ Laurel Hill Dr. <br /> Northbound 0.14 A N/A 0.11 ^ N/A <br /> Southbound 0.24 A 0.21 A <br /> Eastbound 0.23 A 0.11 A <br /> Westbound 0.17 A 0.34 A <br /> <br />Access Engineering December 1, 2003 <br /> ~..~B~31 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.