My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Admin Order 53-14-05-F
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Administrative Orders
>
2014
>
Admin Order 53-14-05-F
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2014 4:03:15 PM
Creation date
7/28/2014 3:15:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Admin Orders
Document_Date
7/28/2014
Document_Number
53-14-05-F
CMO_Effective_Date
8/1/2014
Author
CRO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
that include wanting to wait until the economy stabilizes and wanting to wait until <br />January, 2015 because some employees cannot change their payroll deduction <br />amount for parking until the first of each year. <br />Response The City understands these concerns and weighs the economic <br />impact when determining its parking rate structure. The downturned economy is <br />the reason the City has not increased the fees since 2007. However, it is <br />necessary to increase the rates at this time due to increased operating costs. In <br />terms of Transportation Spending Account holders, because the City works on a <br />fiscal year budget (July 1 — June 30), the fees should be adjusted as proposed, <br />which is close to the start of the City's fiscal year. No changes are being made to <br />the fee schedule as a result of these comments. <br />Comments from those opposed to the rate increases Twenty -two <br />people were opposed to the rate increases for a variety of reasons and submitted <br />statements that included the following concerns: parking rates are already too <br />high; the increases will be a hardship to low income workers; it's not right to <br />increase parking rates in order to finance free parking for others and pay for <br />police services; businesses that pay for their employees' parking will be hit hard <br />by the increases and may choose to leave the downtown area as a result; increase <br />in revenue should be derived from charging for weekend parking and /or <br />eliminating free parking instead of increasing parking rates; it is not right to raise <br />rates especially given that some City employees have to pay for parking while <br />others do not; although the current parking fees are fair, raising them indicates <br />that there are problems in the City's infrastructure; it would be helpful if parking <br />was based on the hours that a car is parked because it is not right that a person <br />parking only part-time has to pay as much as a person who parks full -time. <br />Response The City has considered the impact to downtown hourly wage <br />workers and is constantly weighing the parking impact on downtown economic <br />activity by balancing customer parking needs, employee on- street parking, and <br />maintaining public investment in downtown parking structures that have <br />encouraged economic development. The City used the free parking incentive in <br />an underdeveloped 12 -block area to encourage economic development over the <br />last few years by removing on- street meters and implementing free on- street two - <br />hour parking program. We will continue to evaluate methods that create on- street <br />turnover and balance economic growth. <br />A goal of the paid parking program is to encourage alternative modes of <br />transportation. The City can provide resources to find other means of <br />transportation to our downtown core if the rate increases are a burden. <br />Administrative Order - Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.