My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A - Freight Rte Analysis
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-11/17/04WS
>
Item A - Freight Rte Analysis
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:57:03 PM
Creation date
11/10/2004 8:58:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/17/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Name Oassmcatlon Limits Key Considerations <br /> 31 US 101 Statewide US 30 to OR 6 · Segment contains several: potential, <br /> (Astoria to Retail Task Force recommended and <br /> Tillamook) adopted STAs and UBAs <br /> · Mostly low (under 10%) percent trucks <br /> 32 OR 62 Regional OR 140 to US 97 · Mostly low truck tonnage (under 0.99) <br /> and truck volumes (under 499) <br /> · Traverses Crater Lake National Park <br /> 33 Millican None OR 126 to US 20 · Not a state highway <br /> Road (Prineville to <br /> Millican) <br /> 34 OR 31 Regional US 97 to US 395 · Low truck tonnage (under 0.99) and <br /> (La Pine to Valley truck volumes (under 499) <br /> Falls) · The addition of OR 140 as an OHP <br /> freight route will provide increased <br /> connectivity in the region <br /> <br />¥. Highway Segment Designations and Management Plans <br /> <br />One of the key reasons for the evaluation of additional freight routes is to assess the objective of <br />maintaining a safe and efficient system and the recognition that many communities have grown up along <br />these statewide travel routes. Policy lB of the 1999 Oregon Highway Plan recognizes that state <br />highways serve as the main street of many communities and it strives to maintain a balance between <br />serving these main streets and the through traveler. Policy lB applies to all state highways and provides <br />guidance to ODOT regarding system management planning and implementation activities. It is designed <br />to clarify how ODOT will work with local governments and others to link land use and transportation in <br />transportation plans, facility and corridor plans, plan amendments, access permitting and project <br />development. The role of ODOT and local governments in designating highway segments is to work <br />together so that planned community development patterns are individually tailored yet also meet <br />statewide highway needs for safety and mobility. <br /> <br />Highway Segment Designations include Special Transportation Areas (STA), Urban Business Areas <br />(UBA), and Commercial Centers (CC). The process for designating highway segments begins with the <br />identification of an area in a local transportation system plan, facility plan, downtown plan or other <br />adopted plan. Through communication and cooperation, the local jurisdiction and ODOT reach agreement <br />on the specifics of the designation. ODOT will not proceed without written support by the local <br />government for the designation. Once the parties have reached agreement, the OTC formally designates <br />the segment. For segments not on OHP freight routes or MPO/Metro RTP freight systems, the process <br />ends with the Commission's action. <br /> <br />In January the OTC adopted 133 segment designations around the state, most of them in downtown areas <br />of small and medium sized cities. Most of them are not located on currently designated freight routes, <br /> <br />DRAFT September 1, 2004 15 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.