Laserfiche WebLink
<br />One key component of nodal development, however, is increased densities, which would support <br />the commercial component of the node and utilize the pedestrian friendly features. Even though this <br />is not an adopted node, based on policies discussed further below, it appears that a larger residential <br />component would better suit the potential node area rather than adding to the existing supply of <br />community commercial. <br /> <br />In summary, the proposal is inconsistent with Policies A.13, A.22 and A.23 to the extent that those <br />policies provide direction to achieve higher residential densities than those proposed as part of <br />through the apphcant's "mixed use center." <br /> <br />Economic Element <br /> <br />Increase the amount o.lundeveloped land zonedfor light industrial and commercial uses <br />correlating the effective supply in terms ofsuitability and availabilitJ' with the projections of <br />demand (Policy B.6) <br /> <br />The amendments (in conjunction with the related zone change application) will increase the supply <br />of undeveloped land planned and zoned for commercial use. The approval of these amendments <br />would facilitate the rezoning of the property to community commercial. However, as found under <br />Statewide Planning Goal 9 above, the ECLS specifically states the River Road-Santa Clara area is <br />not projected to need any more commercial land (other than potentially near the Chambers <br />Connector). This is further substantiated below, under EC 9.8424(l)(c) incorporated herein by <br />reference, regarding the commercial land use policies of the B.RSC. Additionally, other policies <br />support the addition of Neighborhood Commercial land rather than the proposed Community <br />Commercial. Therefore, the proposed re-designation of7.3 acres to Commercial and 1.3 acres from <br />Commercial to Medium Density Residential, for a net gain of 6.0 acres of Commercial.. is not <br />consistent with this policy. <br /> <br />Recognize the vital role of neighborhood commercial facilities in providing services and <br />goods to a particular neighborhood. (Policy B.28) <br /> <br />Encourage the expansion or redevelopment 0/ existing neighborhood commercial <br />.fClcilities as surrounding residential densities increase or as the characteristics of the <br />support population change. (Policy B.29) <br /> <br />Although these policies use the terms "recognize" and "encourage", and thus do not serve as <br />mandatory approval criteria, these policies are relevant in that they are specifically cited by the <br />SCCO and are relevant to the extent that a,dditional C-2 zoning might impact existing neighborhood <br />commercial sites. The proposed re-designation would remove 2 acres of Low Density Residential <br />designated property that is currently zoned C-I Neighborhood Commercial and rezone it to (>2 <br />Community Commercial (there is no Neighborhood Commercial designation on the Metro Plan <br />land use diagram). As commented on by the SCCO, it is notable that the proposal increases the <br />community commercial supply in an area with adequate community commercial land, as discussed <br />further below. Additionally, in the context of recognizing the vital role of neighborhood <br />commercial facilities, the applicant's findings (page 25) indicate that the proposed an1endments <br /> <br />Staff Findings m October 8,2007 <br />Page 16 <br />