Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Taylor asked whether new projects proposed by Springfield would place Eugene projects lower on the <br />priorities list and compete for the same funds. Ms. Wilson replied that the proposed priorities lists from all <br />jurisdictions were reviewed in the summer to determine there was no competition for funding and those lists <br />could not be expanded, only reduced. She said the two projects from Springfield were on the proposed <br />priorities list and not added later. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor hoped that the process could be discussed well in advance next year. She asked if Forest Legacy <br />funds could be used to reimburse the City for the acquisition of property with other funds. Ms. Wilson said <br />that replacement of funds already spent was not allowed. <br /> <br />Ms. Ortiz, seconded by Mr. Pryor, moved to adopt the 2008 Federal Priorities Pro- <br />ject List. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark, seconded by Ms. Ortiz, moved to amend the motion by adding $2.5 mil- <br />lion for the Beltline Corridor NEPA study. The motion to amend passed unani- <br />mously, 8:0. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka, seconded by Ms. Taylor, moved to amend the motion to include ap- <br />plication for Forest Legacy grant for the Beverly and Green properties in 2009. <br />The motion to amendment passed unanimously, 8:0. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman said the 2007 priorities list included a request from Springfield for $1.5 million for the <br />Franklin Boulevard corridor study to upgrade to urban standards and Eugene’s request for $500,000 for a <br />West 11th Avenue corridor study. She asked if the West 11th Avenue study had been eliminated. Mr. <br />Inerfeld replied that the City received $150,000 in Surface Transportation Program-Urban (STP-U) through <br />the MPC process and that was adequate to conduct the study. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman asked why Eugene was requesting funding for the Franklin Boulevard-Multiway Corridor <br />project instead of Springfield or LTD. Ms. Wilson said that Eugene’s federal lobbyists felt there was a <br />greater chance of success if the jurisdictions combined NEPA requests into one request. She said the <br />council would be approving the inclusion of Eugene's NEPA request in LTD's request for $5 million in <br />NEPA funding. <br /> <br />The motion as amended passed, 7:1; Ms. Bettman voting in opposition. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman, seconded by Ms. Taylor, moved that the United Front list be rechar- <br />acterized as jurisdictional priorities instead of regional priorities. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman reiterated her objection to lobbying for other jurisdictions' projects when the council could not <br />approve them and said the intent of her motion was to give Eugene's United Front representatives direction <br />on how to lobby for funds in Washington, DC. <br /> <br />City Manager pro tem Jones said that while there was not agreement that the list was a regional document, <br />there was agreement that even if a jurisdiction did not support an item on the list, it would not lobby against <br />it. She emphasized that United Front was a funding initiative and not a policy process and changes would <br />be required to shift from funding to a policy and regional focus. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council January 14, 2008 Page 6 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />