Ordinance No. 20234 Exhibit C - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

uses or other means. Under the 2015 Financially Constrained TransPlan scenario, auto trip lengths are pro- jected to decrease from 3.7 miles under existing conditions to 3~6 miles. OAR 660-012-0035(7): Regional and local TSPs shall include interim benchmarks to assure satisfactory progress towards meeting the requirements of this section at five year intervals over the planning period. MPOs and local governments shall evalu- ate progress in meeting interim benchmarks at five year intervals from adoption of the regional and local TSPs. Where interim benchmarks are not met, the relevant TSP shall be amended to include new or additional efforts adequate to meet the re- quirements of this section. Table 7 of TransPlan Chapter 4, Part 3 provides 2005 and 2010 interim benchmarks for the six performance measures comprising the LCDC-approved alternative standard. OAR 660-012-0035(10):Transportation uses or improvements listed in OAR 660-012-0065(3)(d) to (g) and (0) and located in an urban fringe may be included in . a TSP only if the improvement project identified in the Transportation System Plan as described in section (11) of this rule, will not significantly reduce peak hour travel time for the route as determined pursuant to section (10) of this rule, or the jurisdic- tion determines that the following alternatives can not reasonably satisfy the pur- pose of the improvement project: (a) Improvements to transportation facilities and services within the urban growth boundary; (b) Transportation system management~easures that do not significantly in- crease capacity; or (c) Transportation demand management measures. The jurisdiction needs only to cdnsider alternatives that are safe and effective, consistent with applicable standards and that can be implemented at a reasonable cost using available technology. Projects on the revised TransPlan Financially Constrained 20- Year Capital Investment Actions project lists that may include construction in the urban fringe are not expected to significantly reduce peak hour travel time for tl;le route. These projects are required be-, cause improvements within the urban growth boundary and within city limits will not ac- complish the same results. These projects ate included as a part of the planned transpor- tation projects because they are needed to serve areas adjacent to the UGB, such as the Eugene Airport. The term "urban fringe" refers to the area 5 miles beyond the Eugene-Springfield UGB. "Significantly reduce" is defined elsewhere in the rule to mean a reduction of more than 15% from current conditions. Most of the projects listed in Chapter 3 of the revised Exhibit C Findings in Support of the Adoption of TransPlan 36