Laserfiche WebLink
police department, and the residents of Eugene. This broad scope may contribute to <br />the perceived ambiguity in EPD and city leadership. <br /> <br />Likewise, the Human Rights Commission seeks to insure no Eugene citizen becomes <br />a victim of discrimination. The commission's role and responsibilities <br />in investigating the possibility of racial profiling by the EPD should be better <br />defined. <br /> <br /> Recommendation No. 9: Assess the actual work of the Police and Human <br /> Rights Commissions to ensure they are aligned with the policy and <br /> managerial framework for the city. <br /> <br /> Discussion: The Police and Human Rights Commissions serve in an advisory <br /> capacity to the city, providing feedback and suggestions to the city council, <br /> the city manager, and in the case of the Police Commission, to the police chief. <br /> Perhaps due to the lack of direction within the police departmenb the Police <br /> Commission, in particular, has filled a void in terms of providing input on <br /> policy and directive promulgation for the police department. Remembering <br /> that perceptions have become reality for some in the community and the <br /> police department, it appears to some that the chief of police answers to the <br /> Police Commission. <br /> <br /> It is critically important that both commissions fully understand their <br /> advisory nature, and that the city manager and the police chief develop clear <br /> processes for considering the advisory recommendations of the commissions° <br /> <br /> A previous recommendation concerning the Police Commission is re-visited <br /> here, namely that the city council give serious consideration to transforming <br /> <br /> 26 <br /> <br /> <br />