My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution No. 4875
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Resolutions
>
2006 No. 4856-4897
>
Resolution No. 4875
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 4:50:03 PM
Creation date
6/14/2006 4:39:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Resolutions
Document_Date
6/12/2006
Document_Number
4875
CMO_Effective_Date
6/12/2006
Repeal_Date
5/7/2007
Author
Mary H. Feldman
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Costs by capacity parameter are allocated to growth as fonows: <br />Capacity Projects: Growth's share of capacity expansion (%) X project cost ($) <br />Performance Upgrades: Growth's share of total future system capacity (%) X project cost ($) <br />Rehabilitation Projects: Allocation to growth = 0% <br /> <br />Where: <br /> <br />1. Growth's share of capacity expansion == Projected growth capacity requirement (not met <br />by existing available capacity) divided by additional capacity to be added to the system <br />by planned improvements. ' <br /> <br />2. Growth's share of total future system capacity = Projected growth capacity requirement <br />(total) divided by total future system capacity requirement. <br /> <br />Table 6 summarizes the growth allocation percentages by project type. The documentation <br />for these figures is provided in Appendix C. <br /> <br />TABLE 6 <br />Growth Allocation Percentages by Project Type <br /> <br />Project Type <br /> <br />Capacity (growth's share of capacity <br />expansion),: <br /> <br />, Performance (growths share of total <br />Mure system capacity) <br /> <br />Rehabilitation <br /> <br />Source: 2004 Facilities Plan <br /> <br />Average Flow ' Peak Flow <br />, 100% 29.4% <br /> <br />BOP <br /> <br />TSS <br /> <br />100% <br /> <br />100% <br /> <br />26.1% 10.8% <br /> <br />25.9% <br /> <br />26.1% <br /> <br />0% 0% <br /> <br />0% <br /> <br />0% <br /> <br />Step Four. Adjustments <br /> <br />'The methodology includes the following adjustments to the reimbursement and <br />improvement fee cost bases: <br /> <br />. Gifts or grants from federal or state government or private persons. Existing (and if <br />applicable in the future, planned) asset costs are reduced by the percent of the asset that <br />is funded by grants. <br /> <br />. Ratemaking principles employed to finance the ,capital improvements. Projected <br />capital financing cost (i.e., interest expense) is added to the cost basis, based on the , <br />recommended project phasing and the need to borrow funds. <br /> <br />'Methodology Element Three: Develop SDC Schedule <br /> <br />Unit costs for each capacity parameter are determined by dividing the adjusted cost basis by <br />the projected growth capacity requirements. The unit costs are then multiplied by the <br />estimated capacity requirements of different types of users, as determined from industry <br />reference data. Figure 4 illustrates this process. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.