My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution No. 4875
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Resolutions
>
2006 No. 4856-4897
>
Resolution No. 4875
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 4:50:03 PM
Creation date
6/14/2006 4:39:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Resolutions
Document_Date
6/12/2006
Document_Number
4875
CMO_Effective_Date
6/12/2006
Repeal_Date
5/7/2007
Author
Mary H. Feldman
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />FIGURE 4-SDC SCHEDULE DEVELOPMENT <br /> <br />Using industry reference da,ta for charging SDCs is consistent with the approach MWMC <br />has previously used to charge,SDCs. This type of approach uses flow and strength <br />assumptions that are consistent with the system capacity parameters described previously. <br />For example, average flow is defined as dry season maximum month flow. This capacity <br />measure is used in estimating user capacity requirements. The peak-to-average flow ratio <br />reflects the system planning assumptions. The flow and ~trength aS$umptions for various <br />land uses (development types) are presented in, Appendix D. If information for a particular <br />development is not found in Appendix D, the SDC will be formulated using average data of <br />like or similar development as determined by the City Engineer. <br /> <br />Unit Costs <br /> <br /> <br />x <br /> <br /> <br />x <br /> <br />x <br /> <br /> <br />x <br /> <br />Capacity <br />Requirement / <br /> <br />SDC/Unit <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />- <br />- <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Methodology Element Four: Calculate Revenue Offsets and Credits <br /> <br />To comply with Oregon SDC law, the SDC methodology must ensure that future system users <br />contribute no more than an 1/ equitable share" of the capital costs of existing facilities. Before <br />real property is developed, it may have been subject to taxes that supported capital funding of <br />some of the Regional Wastewater System. After a development ~onnects to the system, it will <br />pay rates and, possibly taxes as well, tha't may also support some level of capital funding. The <br />SDC methodology therefore considers past and future payments to be made by new <br />developments, which may partially fund the same facilities for which the SOCS were paid. <br /> <br />Past Payments <br /> <br />A portion of MWMC's existing facility costs were funded through general obligation (GO) <br />bonds. The debt service on the bonds was retired through property taxes. Undeveloped land <br />in the cities of Eugene and Springfield was' subject to property taxes, and therefor~a GO <br />bond credit is included in the methodology. The credit is equal to the present value of past <br />payments on bond principat expressed in dollars per $1,000 of assessed valuation. The <br />credit shall accrue from the year of annexation, and be b~sed upon the assessed value of the <br />real property at the time of application for connection to the system. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.