Laserfiche WebLink
<br />value of design options are assessed as investments. LCA is an inclusive approach to assessing the envi- <br />ronmental and financial impact of a program, facility, or group of facilities, and encompasses planning, <br />design, construction, operation, and maintenance over the useful life of a facility. The goal of LCA is to <br />achieve the highest, most cost-effective environmental performance possible over the life of the project. <br />When integrated design and life cycle assessment are combined, better and more affordable development <br />strategies emerge. <br /> <br />The City should use life cycle costs assessments that are available for sustainable building practices and <br />materials. Due to the developing nature of sustainable building practices and appearance of new <br />technologies, life cycle cost information may not be available for the full range of sustainable design or <br />program options. In this case, the economic criteria may be applied that sustainable measures be initially <br />cost neutral, or for long-term cost saving measures with higher initial costs, have a payback period of up <br />to 10 years. <br /> <br />Another aspect of implementing a sustainable building policy is the adoption of Commissioning as a <br />standard practice. Commissioning is a way of ensuring that specific performance standards for building <br />systems are included in the project specifications, and that a building’s systems are meeting those per- <br />formance criteria once a project is completed. Commissioning is an added project management tool, and <br />can increase the initial cost of construction. However, proper implementation of commissioning should <br />decrease the long-term operating cost of a building’s heating and cooling system and overall energy use. <br />For existing buildings, adoption of commissioning as an operating practice would be a new program, with <br />a benefit/cost impact dependent on the nature of each specific building. <br /> <br />Commissioning is a LEED requirement for any building, new or existing, to achieve certification. For <br />building projects or existing buildings not required to achieve certification, commissioning should be <br />evaluated on a case-by-case basis, and implemented if there will be an overall positive benefit. Commis- <br />sioning is not expected to be of benefit for non-occupied buildings, due to the minimal electrical and <br />mechanical systems typically used in un-staffed facilities. <br /> <br />What are the Exemptions? <br />Technical exemptions have been discussed above, related to limitations due to funding sources and type <br />of construction that lacks building systems needed for certification. For “certifiable” projects, any policy <br />may have unintended consequences when applied to “real life” situations. Exemptions should be de- <br />signed to allow resolution of unforeseen problems, while supporting the underlying goal of the <br />sustainability of City buildings. <br /> <br />An important underlying assumption is that sustainable buildings have significantly lower ongoing <br />operations and maintenance costs. Some sustainable building practices may have higher initial costs, <br />compared to standard construction practices. The more “cutting edge” the technology—such as photo- <br />voltaics or building-scale wind generation—the higher this initial cost premium may be. Using LEED <br />criteria as a standard will help achieve the expected long-term cost savings, as the LEED rating system <br />emphasizes efficiencies in building heating, cooling and electrical systems, reduced water use, and low- <br />maintenance finishes and grounds that significantly reduce operating costs. <br /> <br />However, the expectation that sustainable building practices can be “cost neutral” may not be true in all <br />cases. The recommendation is that, in the case where certification at the Silver level is not cost-neutral, <br />the requirement for certification may be decreased to a “Certified” level or waived a) if those costs are <br />more than 10% above the estimated cost of construction without those measures, b) if the additional costs <br />are related to sustainability goals and certification requirements which have not been formally accepted <br />by the organization providing external funding, or c) the City Manager determines that the interest of the <br />public is best served by an exemption. To ensure the application of this exemption is used judiciously, a <br />finding of the need for certification at lower than the Silver level or waiver of the certification <br />requirement will be made prior to construction of a project. <br /> 5 <br /> <br />