Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Exhibit C, Consistency with Wetland <br />Designation Criteria <br /> <br />Site DC <br />Amendment #34 <br /> <br />PROTECTION STANDARD <br />1. NR Metro Plan Designation <br /> <br /> <br />COMMENTS <br />Heavy industrial, light medium industrial <br /> <br />PROTECTION CRITERIA MET COMMENTS <br />1. Population of rare plant or animal species with suitable habitat No None found during wetland mapping, but site not <br /> systematically surveyed. Rare plants unlikely due to lack <br /> of suitable habitat. <br />2. Primarily within 100 year floodplain No No part ofthe site is in the flood hazard area. <br />3. Within ~OO feet ofWEWP protected waterway No Corner of site is over 130 feet from A-3 Channel. <br />4. Surface water connection to protected wetland No <br />5. Habitat diversity on site or adds to diversity of habitat system No Majority of site is former log pond with heavy blackberry <br /> growth and woody debris. <br />6. Unique, of special importance to wetland system, and protection Yes Site DC, together with sites DB, DD and DH comprise a <br />would further WEWP goals/objectives large block of habitat and potential habitat at the northern <br /> end of the plan area <br />7. Contains large or moderate to high value wet prairie No <br /> <br />DEVELOPMENT STANDARD <br />1. Approved Wetland Impact Permit <br /> <br /> <br />COMMENTS <br /> <br />DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA MET COMMENTS <br />1. Isolated, disconnected wetland No Site DC is part of larger complex containing sites DD and <br /> DH, both of which are recommended for Development. <br />2. Sanitary sewer, municipal water, street access Yes 16" sanitary at north property line, 12" water in Roosevelt <br /> Boulevard. <br />3. Adjacent to/surrounded by development No Undeveloped land with wetlands on three sides. <br />4. Major highway or street frontage Yes Beltline Road (major arterial) to west, Bertelsen Road <br /> (minor arterial) to east. <br />5. Unique, of special importance to economic development of West No <br />Eugene, and development would further WEWP goals/objectives <br />6. Site cannot be protected from adjacent uses/activities No <br /> <br />RESTORATION STANDARD <br />1. Permit-required wetland mitigation site <br /> <br /> <br />COMMENTS <br /> <br />RESTORE CRITERIA MET COMMENTS <br />1. Contains hydric Soils Yes Heavily disturbed, poorly drained soil. <br />2. Disturbed agricultural or former wetland No Former log pond (not natural wetlands). <br />3. Existing or potential wetland hydrology Yes <br />4. Lacks urban services No <br />5. Over 15 acres or next to protected waterway Yes <br /> <br />Total Wetland Acreage: 15.9 acres total, of which 7.8 acres is already designated <br />for Development. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Recommendation: Designate entire site for Development. <br /> <br />City Council Decision: Same. <br /> <br />Notes: Site is heavily disturbed, with dikes and fill composed of <br />wood waste and other debris, possible contamination; <br />urban services available. <br /> <br />Multiple Site Ordinance, Exhibit C (Refinement Plan Amendment Findings) <br /> <br />Page 64 <br />