Resolution No. 4488 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

was adopted (Feb. 1982) annexation was required for the extension of any city service. * · Our annexation was effective 10/6/83. Cathy faxed this info to me with the date that the Metro Plan was amended to allow sewer service without annexation. (6/13/90) * · Cathy then faxed this change to me, since it was not recorded in the 1987 update to the Metro Area General Plan I had purchased last year. Pg II-D-7, 12/31/91 corrected) May 9. 1996 · Cld Sue Malone. Asked for the Eugene Code pertaining to sewer assessments. Mentioned it might be 7.175. Also asked for the draft of the engineer's report. * · Sue faxed pages 7-20, 7-23, and 7-24 · Sue said it might serve me better to have the 95 engineer's report for formation of the LID. Said she will be gone tomorrow, but will leave the report with the receptionist to pick up in the morning. I said it might be difficult to complete my report by noon tomorrow. She said I could wait until Monday, but they would still want a copy. May 10.1996 * · 8:20 a.m. Picked up April 12, 1995 report to the Hearings Official. · Walked to the Planning Department to get the missing pages of Eugene Code on Local Improvements. Department closed until 1 0:30 a.m. for employee workshops. · Read all material to see if there was anything written in policies, code, or previous findings that pertained to property with two sewer lines. Ascertained the need for the Findings and Recommendations of the Hearings Official after consideration of the 95 engineers report. Also, need to learn actual assessments for all the properties fronting onto the proposed sewer extension. Made list of requests for Sue Malone on Monday. Determined that taxlots 1900 and 2000 did not qualify for inclusion in the new service district because the first requirement that must be satisfied for inclusion in the LID is that there be no other method of delivering the public service. (Page II-B-5, #14. a.) Also, the Eugene Code regarding "sanitary sewer assessments" says that the cost of the sewer will be borne by the specially benefited properties. There is no benefit to 1900 and 2000 from the proposed sewer line. I need to check the Findings of the last hearing to see. if there is any argument to refute my interpretation of these laws. Mary Thompson, 84 Green Lane, Eugene 97404 , , Page 3 ,