My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution No. 4488
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Resolutions
>
1996 No. 4474-4510
>
Resolution No. 4488
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 4:46:55 PM
Creation date
7/13/2006 8:15:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Resolutions
Document_Date
6/10/1996
Document_Number
4486
CMO_Effective_Date
6/10/1996
Author
Warren G. Wong
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />* <br /> <br />May 13.1996 <br />· Requested of Sue Malone <br />- Copy Findings and Recommendations - 95 Hearing <br />- Copy Draft Engineers Report SC 1996 Basin 96S <br />- Maps of Green Lane showing existing and proposed sewer extensions <br />- List of all properties west of manhole N5W2-103 and the estimated <br />assessment on each. <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />· Picked up material from Engineers office <br /> <br />On estimates: only received Sailadas, Vanderhoff (not needed) and Rossell <br />(not needed). <br /> <br />· Wrote most of the report for the engineer. <br /> <br />· 4:15 p.m. Called Sue Malone to ask for the assessments calculated for the <br />school lots, the four business lots on River Road that are going to be served by <br />the sewer, and for the Gasoline Station. Sue said the school did not receive <br />notice of any assessments because they are deferred. She gave me the figures <br />for the four business lots: 900 - $3429.00, 800 - $2925.59, 601 - $5369.87, <br />501 - $1619.03. <br /> <br />· When I asked about lot 2100 (Gas Stn) Sue said it did not have to be assessed <br />because it was non-benefited by public sewers. I questioned her again <br />because the proposed sewer would front along at least one half of the <br />property's north boundary. She insisted that taxlot 2100 was appropriately <br />excluded because it "has already built a private sewer line and service and <br />have connected." This determination was made on April 1 0, 1996. <br /> <br />I told Sue that the sewer line from the Gas Station was running along an <br />easement granted by tax lot 2000 and connected into the same sewer that <br />taxlot 2000 and 1900 were connected to. <br /> <br />Sue said that the engi'1eers have still determined that taxlot 2100 does not <br />benefit from the proposed sewer line and therefore has not been included in <br />the process. <br /> <br />· I told Sue I could have my report done by tomorrow. <br /> <br />The exclusion of taxlot 2100 collaborates my interpretation on the policy and <br />codes. <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />· Report draft completed by 10:30 p. m. <br /> <br />May 14.1996 <br />· 8:45 a.m. Sue Malone in ,a meeting. Iw for her to return my call. <br /> <br />. Mary Thompson, 84 Green Lane, Eugene 97404 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.