Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The Proposed Coordinated Population Allocations reflect the rapid growth of several of Eugene’s <br />neighboring cities and the visioning processes completed by several of those cities in recent years. <br />Over the past 15 years, the rate of population growth in Creswell (4%), Veneta (3%), Coburg (2.5%) and <br />Junction City (2%) has outpaced the growth of Eugene, Springfield, Lane County and the State as a <br />whole. As indicated in the Strategy, “The land use actions of one jurisdiction affect other jurisdictions <br />in the region but there is no mechanism to address the impacts because current state and local planning <br />takes place within individual UGBs…” And, “currently growth in many of the small cities is outpacing <br />growth in the two metropolitan areas and there is no mechanism to ensure that buffers are maintained <br />between communities in the future. Continuation of this trend without consideration of the impacts and <br />planning for the necessary infrastructure will have regional impacts on natural resources, transportation, <br />housing affordability, and the regional economy….” The Proposed Coordinated Population Allocations <br />and Growth Management Concept attempt to “…direct growth into areas where it would have minimal <br />environmental impacts and still meet the development objectives of the participating local <br />communities.” The mechanisms for achieving this shift in projected growth rates would be determined <br />by the Eugene City Council; initial steps would likely include a Metro Plan amendment process to <br />incorporate the coordinated population allocation, among other changes. <br /> <br />Issue – Densification: <br /> The Strategy and the Regional Growth Concept are consistent with adopted <br />local planning efforts, such as the Eugene Growth Management Study that calls for densification within <br />the city prior to expansion of city boundaries. The Regional Growth Concept assumes an increase in the <br />net density of Eugene’s residential development from the current level of 6.0 units per net acre to 7.6 <br />units per net acre. When adopted in 1982, the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan <br />assumed a “target” density of 6.0 dwelling units per net acre. Eugene’s net residential densities have <br />risen steadily from 5.1 du/a in 1977; passing 5.7 du/a in 1992, and achieving the Metro Plan target in <br />2006. <br /> <br />Issue – Urban Reserves <br />: Even with the assumed increases in development densities and full build-out <br />of all 38 potential mixed-use centers identified in TransPlan, it is clear that UGB expansion is inevitable <br />. <br />for the City of Eugene at some point in the future. Eugene’s current UGB contains almost 28,600 acres <br />The Regional Growth Concept, and the Land Capacity Model used to develop that concept indicate a <br /> <br />2055 need for about 31,600 acres, an increase of almost 3000 acres (see Attachment F). By comparison, <br />that model indicates a need for an additional 5,600 acres within the UGB if historic growth trends are <br /> <br />assumed. <br /> <br />As described in the Strategy and the memo from the City Attorney’s Office, a Eugene UGB expansion <br />plan could be drafted such that UGB expansions are initiated upon the achievement of a specified <br />residential density target within the current UGB. <br /> <br />Issue - Implementation Resources <br />: Just as implementation of Eugene’s adopted Growth Management <br />Policies has required local policy makers to rethink how resources should be reallocated to achieve <br />intended outcomes, implementation of the Regional Growth Strategy will also require an additional <br />reallocation to implement local actions. The Strategy suggests several funding approaches to support this <br />program in future years. Implementation of the Strategy, beyond the actual endorsement, is voluntary <br />and would be left entirely to local jurisdictions. <br /> <br />If the council votes to endorse, staff will incorporate information on resources and actions needed to <br />implement the Regional Growth Management Strategy and will return to the council for further direction <br />as part of the fall PDD work program discussion. <br /> <br /> L:\CMO\2006 Council Agendas\M060814\S060814C.doc <br /> <br />