My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/06/17 City Council Agenda Packet
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
CMO
>
2017
>
03-06-2017
>
03/06/17 City Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/3/2017 3:20:29 PM
Creation date
3/3/2017 3:20:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Packet
CMO_Meeting_Date
3/6/2017
CMO_Effective_Date
3/6/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
practical for working, shopping, and other daily <br />activities; managing congestion; and improving safety. <br />One primary focus of both the Metro Plan and Envision <br />Eugene is on more compact development. As such, <br />significant future residential development is likely to <br />Volume 2, Appendix E), including: Willamette Street, <br />W 11th Avenue, Highway 99N, River Road, Coburg <br />Road, and Franklin Boulevard. The 2035 TSP includes <br />projects and programs, and identifies financial <br />resources, that support the growth anticipated over <br />the next 20 years along these key corridors. <br />The transportation financing program (Chapters 5 and <br />6) provides for phasing of major improvements to <br />encourage infill and redevelopment of urban lands <br />prior to facilities and improvements which would <br />cause premature development of urbanizable lands or <br />conversion of rural lands to urban uses. The 2035 TSP <br />does not promote extension of streets outside the <br />UGB that would promote urbanization of rural lands. <br />OAR 660-012-0060 Plan and Land Use Regulation Amendments <br /> <br />(1) If an amendment to a functional plan, an As part of the 2035 TSP adoption package, section 67 <br />acknowledged comprehensive plan, or a land of Ordinance No. 20528 will be deleted, thereby lifting <br />use regulation (including a zoning map) would the trip cap imposed on the properties rezoned by that <br />significantly affect an existing or planned ordinance. <br />transportation facility, then the local <br />government must put in place measures as <br />Ordinance No. 20528 was adopted in May, 2014, as an <br />provided in section (2) of this rule, unless the <br />Envision Eugene efficiency measure. Ordinance No. <br />amendment is allowed under section (3), (9) or <br />20528 created a new E-2 Mixed Used Employment <br />(10) of this rule. A plan or land use regulation <br />zone in West Eugene and converted I-1 Campus <br />amendment significantly affects a <br />Industrial zone to the E-1 Campus Employment zone in <br />transportation facility if it would: <br />three areas of the City. Section 67 of Ordinance No. <br />(a) Change the functional classification of an <br />20528 imposed a trip cap on all of the properties that <br />existing or planned transportation facility <br />are subject to a code amendment or zone change that <br />(exclusive of correction of map errors in an <br />would allow uses that would generate more traffic <br />adopted plan); <br />than is currently allowed on those properties. <br />(b) Change standards implementing a <br />Specifically, the City imposed trip caps on all of the <br />functional classification system; or <br />properties where the currently allowed uses will be <br />(c) Result in any of the effects listed in <br />expanded, either as a result of the newly-named E-1 <br />paragraphs (A) through (C) of this subsection <br />zone or a zone change to C-2 or E-2. With the <br />based on projected conditions measured at the <br />proposed trip caps, traffic generated from the subject <br />end of the planning period identified in the <br />properties after the code amendments and zone <br />adopted TSP. As part of evaluating projected <br />changes could not have exceed the amount of traffic <br />conditions, the amount of traffic projected to <br />that could be generated from these properties prior to <br />be generated within the area of the <br />adoption of the code amendments and zone changes. <br />amendment may be reduced if the amendment <br />The trip cap was imposed on a corridor-level, and the <br />Exhibit A to an Ordinance Concerning Long Range Transportation Planning <br />Page 41 of 63 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.