03/13/2017 City Council Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Attachment C have been fully developed, and remain under continued residential uses with the benefit of at least the inininturn level of urban facilities and services each that they have certainly been "urbanized". The minimum level of urban facilities and services are already available to the subject property as discussed below in response to EC 9.7825 Annexation — Approval Criteria (3). Therefore, the proposed annexation is consistent with Metro Plan Policy 15. Metro Plan Policy 17 applies to local govcninicrit as opposed to the applicant, in that it concerns dissolution of special service districts after annexation and consideration of intergovernmental agreements with affected special service districts. Tlic applicant does not object to the dissolution of any special service districts as necessary. The proposed annexation is not inconsistent with this policy. Metro Plan Policy 19 states that annexation of territory to existing set -vice districts within the UG13 shall Occur ODIY when immediate annexation to a city is not possible because the required minimum level of key urban facilities and services cannot be provided in a timely manner (within 5 years) and, except for areas that have no fire protection, affected property owners have signed consent to annex agrecillents. As addressed below in response to EC 9.7825 Annexation — Approval Criteria (3), the nitnimuni level of key Urban facilities and services are already available to the subject property such that intmediate annexation to the City is possible. Therefore, Metro Plan Policy 19 is not applicable to the proposed annexation. Metro Plan Policy 20 states that when unincorporated territory within the UG 13 is provided with ally 1lCW Urban service, that service shall be provided by the following method (in priority order): a) Annexation to a city-, b) Contractual annexation agreements with a city; c) Annexation to an existing district; or d) creation of a new service district. Annexation to the City of Eugene is being proposed to allow connection to, and/or continued utilization of existing City utilities and Urban services, by the subject property consistent with this policy. The subject property is currently zoned R- I "Low Density Residential", consistent with the current "Lowy Density Residential" designation per the current Metro Plan. The subject property is located within the boundaries of the River Road — Santa Clara Urban Facilities Plan. Said refinement plan Supports the annexationurbanization, and provision of urban facilities and services to properties within its boundaries. The proposed annexation is consistent with applicable policies set forth in said refinement plan. In consideration of the above, as well as relevant portions of the statements below addressing EC 9.7825 Annexation — Approval Criteria (3), the proposed annexation is consistent with applicable policies in the Metro Plan and applicable refinement plans and therefore satisfies EC 9.7825 Annexation — Approval Criteria (2). 9.782.5 Anne.vation — Appiwval Criteria. (continued) (3) the proposed ctnnexcilion ivill result in o bouncicu:y in iv rich the n7inilnurn level ref kvy 111,bern ftrc icilifies cwclseviev, cts clefined in the Alletro 11cm, con he 1,)rovided in w.i orclerl q ficientnd , cilitnelV incillner. Written Statement for Annexation SSW Job #16-7371 For: Bob Tate PAGE 3 of 5