CCAgenda-3/08/04Mtg - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

2288 Fairmount Blvd. Eugene, OR 97403 February 25, 2004 Dear Members of the City Council, We arrived at the February 23rd heating on the University of Oregon East Campus plan with hopeful hearts; we left feeling saddened and discouraged. The neighborhood's support of the huge increase in density that will occur as a result of the East Campus plan is DEPENDENT on the City's requirement that the university fund appropriate traffic mitigation and parking solutions that will guarantee the continued livability of our historic and beautiful neighborhood. At the February 23 meeting, we were congratulated heartily for the process that resulted in the plan before you. But, let us be perfectly clear: THIS WAS THE UNIVERSITY'S PLAN TO BEGIN WITH and the neighborhood was able to interject some "trimming" around the edges. In most cases this "trimming" concerned matters that followed standards of good planning principles to begin with. The only zoning issue that the neighborhood was passionate about (the continuation of no conditional use permits on the very narrow border orR-1 property, some of which directly abuts private R-1 homes to the south) has been greatly diluted. Please do not confuse the neighborhood compromises on increased density with enthusiasm; much of the neighborhood feels very "raw" from this process and very much marginalized. The University of Oregon is, like Peace Health was, and any other large business is, a DEVELOPER and should have the responsibilities of a developer. A housing development is cun'ently being built on Moon Mountain in Eugene and BEFORE these lots were sold and one drop of concrete was poured, the developer was required to install proper roads and infrastructure that will accommodate increased traffic. When the arena was under active discussion, the University always put off the discussion of a proper parking structure until "later." The University wants to be able to make plans; however, the neighbors also need to have assurances IN WRITING that our livability standards will not be eroded. "Later" too easily becomes "never." We respectfully request that the City fund the Agate Street and Fairmount Neighborhood traffic calming study, make the Fairmount Neighborhood traffic issues a top priority (we are the neighborhood facing massive internal development), and REQUIRE the University to implement and pay for traffic mitigation and parking solutions in the Fairmount Neighborhood. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Dr. Christina M. Holzapfel Dr. William E. Bradshaw City Council Agenda page 283