Laserfiche WebLink
MEMORANDUM <br />December 8, 2004 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br /> Applications quicker than 80 days. <br /> <br /> Adjustment Review and TIA applications can be submitted concurrently. <br /> Katharine confirmed with Keli Osborn, Permit Review Manager, that an <br /> Adjustment Review application can be submitted concurrently with a building <br /> permit application. Keli said that she would also be open to trying to review a <br /> TIA concurrently with a building permit. City Staff is concerned that the <br /> potential outcome of the TIA review might require design changes which could <br /> affect the building permit approval. Therefore, City Staff recommends that the <br /> applicant might want to develop the TIA in advance of completing the building <br /> permit drawings and review the results of the TIA with City Staff to identify in <br /> advance any changes that might be required. <br /> <br /> In addition, if the applicant wants to relocate the existing 20' access easement, <br /> Steve Nystrom, via telephone communication (12/2/04), indicated that the <br /> Partition, Final Plat, does not need to be amended. The applicant will need to <br /> submit a Vacation of an Unimproved Public Easement (PUE) application to <br /> move the existing easement. Vacation of an Unimproved PUE is a Type I <br /> Application. <br /> <br /> The Type I review process provides for administrative review by the planning <br /> director. The application process does not include public notice. It can take <br /> approximately 65 days for a decision to be rendered. However, Steve said that <br /> City Staff typically processes Type I Applications in a few weeks. He said that <br /> City Staff will want to see the location of the relocated easement at the time of <br /> the submittal of the Vacation of an Unimproved PUE application. He suggests <br /> that the applicant submit the Vacation of an Unimproved PUE application <br /> concurrently with the proposal of the new replacement easement. <br /> <br /> When I asked him if we could submit this Type I application concurrently with <br /> the building permit application, he said that I would need to follow up with Keli <br /> Osborn for an answer to this question. <br /> <br />5. What is the proposed use and purpose of the 20' access easement directly to <br /> the north of the subject property? <br /> <br /> Kurt explained that the easement was established to provide a schematic <br /> circulation pattern, which met street connectivity standards (no greater than a <br /> 600'-0" block length distance between streets). The approved refinement plan <br /> amendment and zone change for the Chase Node includes language requiring <br /> 2 accessways connecting Garden Way and Marche Chase Drive through the <br /> <br /> <br />