Laserfiche WebLink
MEMORANDUM <br />December 8, 2004 <br />Page 5 <br /> <br /> land between MLK Boulevard and Kinsrow Avenue. In addition, EC <br /> 9.3125(2)(a)(1) requires that the location of streets conform to Map <br /> 9.3125(2)(a)(1), which illustrates 2 streets. Kurt clarified that the map indicates <br /> the northern street as a "Local Streets and Local Collectors.~ It is intended to <br /> read as an "Easements for through-traffic and pedestrian access and/or <br /> alleyway.~ <br /> <br /> The City envisioned this particular accessway as an alleyway between the <br /> commercial and residential developments, which would function as the loading <br /> and delivery drive for the commercial development located to the south. The <br /> easement is in this particular location because the Simpson Partition application <br /> included specific street dedication easements to satisfy the refinement plan and <br /> street connectivity standards (EC 9.6810-9.6815). At the time of the Partition <br /> approval, the subject site and the property to the north were under single <br /> ownership. <br /> <br /> Kurt pointed out that although the street connectivity standards require private <br /> streets to be fully improved per City standards, the City is willing to be flexible <br /> to allow one of the 2 accessways to occur throu§h a parking aisle. Leslie said <br /> that if one of the accessways occurred through a parking aisle, the City would <br /> most likely require that the parking be angled. Leslie responded that the City <br /> would be open to potentially allowing 90 degree parking in one of the <br /> accessways, if it is determined that this parking orientation does not affect the <br /> intent and function of the 2 accessways. A TIA would need to be performed to <br /> make this determination. <br /> <br />6. Per EC 9.3125(3)(c), "[alt least two drives (public or private) shall be shown <br /> making a connection between Garden Way and Marche Chase Drive." <br /> <br /> The proposed conceptual site plan proposes one private vehicle drive <br /> connecting Garden Way and Marche Chase Drive. Additionally, the access <br /> easement that exists north of the subject parcel could provide a second vehicle <br /> drive connecting Kinsrow Road and Marche Chase Drive. <br /> <br /> Would this proposed development have to provide this second connecting <br /> drive to meet this code criterion? If so please explain why and the conditions. <br /> <br /> As stated above under #5, 2 accessway easements are required to connect <br /> Garden Way and Marche Chase Drive through the land between MLK <br /> Boulevard and Kinsrow Avenue. Katharne showed the group the newly <br /> submitted building permit application drawings for the property to the north, <br /> <br /> <br />