09/25/1944 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r,264 .. . -::~-~.~_---;:--- ----=---c-----: - ':~-'-::-:'-.:;::--:---: ------ -=--------:.------.--=------.-,.:-:-_~.~ ~~--.---_-__:~.~:-:__ --=:~_:_-~~ ----:"- --:--"'--C:-: ~-::---- ~""--:-::-::-:-~ -~-=- - --:-: --= -~. -=---==~----,------=--:-::--.-::-_ ~-~--=-:--~--------~--,-c-- -- _. - ~----_~--:;;--- --~-----c-~- ----;:.---;---.-.-.-~ - --~.:.!r-c:...=-.'~'~~~ ~-=----_._- ~ - ,- - .. - - .. - . - - - -- - - - - ,- ~ - ~~~-------'-------........-_- ~-'-- ----~_._-- I ~.;lJ R. Baumgartner offers $800.00 cash for the south i of lot 6, all of lot 7, and the north i of lot 8, block 11, Fairmount Addition. (west side Walnut I .,~', I \",,~~,. ': 233.37 feet north of 17th). ;~;+ Appraisal: $1350.00 Counter offer; $1350.00 ,...~ . ~~ Pa ul W. Campbell offers for client Earl Gregg $600.00 cash for part of lot 1, I block 13, Fairmount Addition. 58.4' x 160' (116!8 feet south of 15th, west 12 side Villard). . I I Appraisal: $600.00 I Sold I ! I Pa ul W. Campbell offers for client, Earl Gregg $515.00 cash for the south I 56.1 feet of lot 9, block 6, Fairmount Addition. (west side Villard 133.4' ) 13 north of 15th). I Appraisal: $515.00 Sold L. W. Carlisle offers $350.00 cash for lot 7 in block 15, College Hill Park, ! (S.E. corner 21st and Lawrence streets). offer dated 9-25-44. 14 Appraisal: $350.00 I Refused - better offer received I I Bethel E. Clubb offers $400.00 cash for the south 47.72 feet of lots 1 and 2, I I 15 and a 7 foot strip on the south. (east side McMillan between 23rd and 24th). I Block 4, Rughs Addition. :! Appraisal: $650.00 i I -Counter offer: $525.00 , I . . .! On motion made, seconded and carried the recommendation of ' the committee was i I adopted. ,I ! Councilman Farrington stated that the Recorder had referred"to the Finance Committee the question of re-employment in the Fire Department of C. C. Ball - that Mr. Ball had been given a leave of absence"on February 22, 1943 to join the Civil Air Ratrol. That re was back in Eugene at the I present time on a leave of absence and that he had stated his discharge I papers would be received at an early date. councilman Farrington stated 16 th~t it was the recommendation of the Finance Committee that C. C. Ball be , I re-employed'as a member of the Fire Department at the same standing as other I workers when given leave of assence and his name be placed on the pay~roll i at a salary of $195.00 a month which was in keeping with the salary increases I that had been given other employees in the same bracket at the time of his leave of absence. There was some discussion of the matter and Councilman Davis stated that in the absence of the recommendation from the Fire Chief he thought that the matter should be post-poned. Councilman Hawn explained to Mr. Davis that the employees in the Fire Bepartment were under Civil Service and that the Fire Chief had no authority to recommend a leave of absence or to say when an employee should come back but that it was up to : the Council. That the Council had given the leave of absence with the under- i standing that Mr. C. C. Ball could return to the department. A motion was I I made by Councilman Farrington and seconded by Crumbaker that as soon as ; Mr. C. C. Ball received his discharge papers that he be reinstated in the I i Fire Department at a salary of $195.00 per month. On vote this motion"was I I carried. . " At this time Councilman Barette presented a proposed amendment to the Rent Control Ordinance No. 8800. This amendment had been prepared by I Colonel Tierney. Col. Tierney was present and addressed the Council and ! stated in his remarks-that this proposed amendment had not been passed on , by the Rent Control Committee. Councilman Barette explained that 2 of the : members of the committee had been out of town; for that reason no meeting 17 of the committee had been held. The proposed amendment stated that .this I was a critical area and there was considerable discussion by the Council as i ! to whether this should be included in the Ordinance. It was suggested that I : the matter might be referred to the Juciciary Committee and the City Attorney I and Colonel Tierney stated that if it was referred to the Committee he wanted I ! the committe to see him at the office and get 1st had information of conditions as they existed. Colonel Tierney had addressed a letter to the Federal Rent ! Control Division in the Bedell Building Portland. The carbon copy of the -I reply to the letter under date of September 15th had been sent "the City Attorney and he quoted from the letter and explained the situation to the Council. Councilman Hawn let the discussion in favor of the proposed amend- ment by Colonel Tierney and was supported in the-Amendment by Counc11men I Bailey, Koppe and Barette. A motion was made by Koppe and seconded by Hawn I that the amendment be included in the ordinance, as follows:- " I " i I I ~ ,: