|
<br />r54
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />". ..___ _..._ ---- -._-....:.-_-__.__.,.':.....:_._____. :.-==_-_-.-,:--:t_ ___ _ _ -- r__' ".n ______~._ _-.-;-._.--..-.-_---_--._-_~ ___..." ----.-0--
<br />,- ",.=.~',"~o,-,-,' .,",.".', ""---,"O,~..,... '.0,",.' ."" . -,~ '. ,'0' .,~~-.-.-,.._~_-'.--_.-',. .,.- "."" ..,'..-.',.~,~~,-.-lI'.'._...,-~-- ....'
<br />
<br />I: .
<br />
<br />It was moved by Bailey, seconded by Johnson that the report of the Planning t
<br />Conimission be received .and ,placed on file and that the recommendation contained ::
<br />;c" therein be approved and tha t the City Attorney and City Engineer proceed to take i' I"
<br />(i",.: the necessary action initiating the proposed vacation. It was further moved,. . :'
<br />c:...'1 seconded and carried that the City Engineer be. requested to likewise submit a i,
<br />~ report to the Council with reference to the vacation and/or re-alignment of the" :
<br />street between Baker Blvd., .and Onyx Street. Motion carried. i;
<br />
<br />. . I:
<br />
<br />. A: report of the Planning Commission re: proposed extension of Jefferson 1:
<br />12 Stteet: was su bmi tted and read as follows: :i
<br />"
<br />
<br />"The Planning Commission of the City of E~gen~ begs to report that on October ~ 1-
<br />2,"1947, it met at a special session and thereafter considered a proposed extension ij
<br />of. Jefferson Street southerly from the City Limits to the Lorane Highway. It appears
<br />to" the: Planning Commission that Jefferson Street affords a natural through north jt
<br />and south arterial for the City, and that steps should immediately be taken to acqut:re
<br />necessary street rights of way so that a future extension of Jefferson Street would~
<br />not be jeopardized. . ~
<br />I,
<br />':
<br />THEREFORE, the Planning Commission respectfully recommends unto the Common i!
<br />Council the future extension of Jefferson Street southerly from the City limits to ';
<br />its junction with the Lorane Highway as a main'arterial for theCity and for the :
<br />City to enter into such contracts and agreements with the County Court of Lane Coun~y,
<br />Oregon as shall seem to the Common Council and said court wise and expedient. n I'
<br />.:
<br />"
<br />It was moved by Crumbaker, seconded by Davis that the report of the Planning Com- i!
<br />mission be received and placed on file and that the Manager and City Attorney pre-
<br />pare agreement. .:
<br />,. .
<br />... ,.. ....
<br />13 A perm?nent report of the Planning Commission was submitted and read as fol16w~:
<br />
<br />"As a permanent report pursuant to the Resolution of the City of Eugene di- :,
<br />recting the City Planning Commission to prepare a report upon certain requests for ~e-
<br />classification and zoning in areas within. said City and upon certain other matters I
<br />concerning the opening of streets, construction of public buildings and ~ttending .
<br />matters, the City Planning Commission hereby adopts as its permanent report the ;1
<br />following: :: 'I
<br />
<br />The Planning Commi~sion rec~mmends the denial of the f~llowing rezoning. and-~ i!
<br />change of classification, to-wit: '
<br />';
<br />CARRIE MARGARET REESE: ,:
<br />Property located at 1690, Moss Street. ;,
<br />Requested change from single family residence to multiple family R-3. II
<br />classification. ~
<br />
<br />The City Planning, Commission recommends unto the Common Council the leasing t: <-
<br />and leeting of city-owned property in the vicinity of 13th Avenue West and Chambers ~
<br />Street, unto the U. S. Government for the construction and maintenance of a Naval ::
<br />Reserve Training Armory. ' . " " .-,
<br />.
<br />
<br />The Planning Commission begs to report that it is not fully advised upon each
<br />of the following applications for reclassification now" pending before them: Royal
<br />Christopherson, C. A. Service, D. W. Barker, and H. R. Byers, and further that the :
<br />commission retE!ins the petitions for further study.". . ,I
<br />
<br />. "
<br />
<br />It was moved by Pennington, seconded by Davis that the report of the Planning
<br />Commission be received and placed on file and that the recommendations contained
<br />therein be approved. Motion carried.
<br />
<br />. .
<br />
<br />A report from Dr. A. Triolo, Chairman of the Health Board, was submitted and ' ,
<br />14 read a s follows: j! 1
<br />
<br />"The City Board ~f Health, at its October meeting, gave further consideration ~
<br />to the problem of the milk supply for the City of Eugene. The point of particular '
<br />. conSideration was the feasibility of milk supply after January 1, 1948, under the
<br />Grade "A" standard prescribed by t~e city milk ordinance. .
<br />
<br />A hearing was given the managers of the two leading milk distributors in :
<br />Eugene and a letter on the subject from the Lane County -Market Milk Produeers" Inc.;:
<br />expressed the reaction of a number of prod ucers to the strict enforceme,nt of the" 1
<br />ordinance as of January 1, 1948. "
<br />V
<br />. -
<br />The monthly report of the Meat and Milk InspectoIl,~:.indicates that no official ,I
<br />action has been taken by the State Milk Control Board in answer to the Health '
<br />Board's request for the enlargement of the Eugene milk shed. ~
<br />\
<br />
<br />.. '
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />~
<br />
|