|
<br />((\)/~
<br /><iJ1,
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />2. REZONING or AREA BETWEEN ALMADEN AND FILMORE STR~ETS BEiwEt~ ~fH AN~8t~ A~iNUES,
<br />NORTH OF' THE ALLEY BETWEEN 7TH AND 8TH AVENUES' - IT WAS THE' RECOMMENDAtl ON 0,. . THE.
<br />COMMITTEE THAT THIS REZONING BE APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
<br />
<br />3. PETITION F'OR THE IMPROVEMENT or 25TH AVENUE F'ROM MADISON TO MONROE STREETS -'THE
<br />CITY MANAGER EXPLAINED THAT A PETITION HAD BEEN RECEIVED F'OR THE PAVING or 25TH-AvENUE
<br />F'ROM ,MADI SON TO MONROE,STREETS, CONTAI NI NG 58.33 PERCENT OF' THLPRoptRTY' OWNE~SHI.P TO
<br />~BE ,ASSESSED. THE COMMITTEE VIEWED THE AREA"AND NOTED THAT THE PETITION, AS PRESENTED,
<br />INCLUDES ONLY A ONE BLOCK AREA WHtCH WOULD NOT CONNECT TO ANY OTHER 'PAVED STREET.
<br />
<br />THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE PETITIONERS BE ASKED TO CIRCULATE A PEtiTION TO
<br />ADD AN ADDITIONAL BLOCK TO THE EAST OR TO THE WEST, OR BOTH, WHICH WOULD CONNECT THE
<br />STREET EITHER WIT~ JEF'rERSON OR FRIENDLY STREETS.
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />4. PETITION F'OR THE PAVING OF' DANNA COURT rROM 34TH P.LACE SOUTH'TO THE END or. THEf
<br />STREET - THE COMMITTEE VIEWED AN AREA COVERED BY PETITION or 63.60 PER CENT OF' THE
<br />PROPERTY OWNERSHI P r0R';THE PAV I NG OF' DANNA COURT rROM 34TH PLACE SOUTH, DANNA C,OURT.
<br />BEING A CULDESAC. ON THE ,BASIS OF' THE PETITION WHICH HAD BEEN CIRCULATED, IT WAS THE
<br />RECOMMENDATION OF' THE COMMITTEE THAT THE STREET BE PAVED AND THAT THE NECESSARY
<br />ORDINANCES BE PASSED INITIATING THIS PROJECT.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />5. POLICY ON WIDENING 18TH AVENUE, NORTH SIDE, IMMEDIATELY WEST or WILLAMETTE STREET-
<br />THE COMMITTEE AGAIN VIEWED THE AREA WHICH HAS BEEN PROPOSED rOR WIDENING AT THE NORTHWEST
<br />CORNER Of' 18TH AV,ENUE AND WILLAMETTE STREET, ON 18TH AVE"UE. IT WAS E,XPLAINEDTHAT,"
<br />SUBJE~t TO BUDGETARY CONSIDERATION 18TH AVENUE MIGHT BE WIDENED ON BOTH SIDES OF' THE
<br />STREET BETWEEN WILLAMETTE AND CHARNELTON STREETS IN rlSCAL YEAR' 1956-57, BUT THAT'.IT
<br />WAS NOT ECONOMICALLY F'EASIBLE F'OR THE CITY TO WIDEN A SIXTY rOOT AREA ON THE NORTH SIDE
<br />or ~8TH AVENUE EAST Of' THE ALLEY BETWEEN VILLAMETTE AND OLIVE STREETS, AS HAD ~EEN
<br />PROPOSED, BUT THAT THIS WIDENING SHOULD BE DONE AT THE SAME TIME AS THE WIDENING or
<br />, 18TH AVENUE BETWEEN WI L:LAMET.TE __AND.CHAR'NEL TON'iSTREETS~':L' IT WAS POI NTED OUT THAT THE'
<br />COUNCIL HAD ALREADY GIVEN PERMISSION TO THE RICHF'IELD OIL COMPANY rOR THE WIDENING or
<br />18TH AVENUE ADJA~ENT TO THE PROPERTY AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER or 18TH AVENUE AND
<br />WILLAMETTE STREET. THEIR WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE NEAR rUTURE.
<br />
<br />THECOMMIT.TE.E RECOMMENDED THAT, EXCLUDING THE' RICHrlELD OIL COMPANY WIDENING PROJECT,
<br />THE REMAINDER or THE WIDENING BETWEEN WILLAMETTE AND CHARNEL TON STREETS SHOULD BE HELD
<br />IN AB~YANCE PENDING BUDGETARY CONSIDERATION.
<br />
<br />6. PETITION F'OR WAIVER OF' ONE rOOT SET BACK rOR SIDEWALK ON 28TH AVENUE BETWEEN POTTER
<br />AND UNIVERSITY STREETS, NORTH SIDE OF' STREET - THE COMMITTEE VIEWED THIS AREA AND THE
<br />CI TY, MANAGER EXPLAI NED THAT THE PE'Tl1'I0NERS' ARE REQUESTI NG A CURB SI aEWALK IN THI SAREA
<br />PRINC'IPALLY BECA'USE THERE WOULD,BE ONLY TWO rEET BETWEEN THE rACE or -THE CURB AND THE
<br />SIDEWALK AREA. THE PE.TI TI ON REPRESENTS 48.79 PER CENT OF' THE PROPERTY OWNERS.
<br />
<br />: I!II VI,EWING THE AREA, THE COMMI TTEE rOUND NO PARTI CULAR TOPOGRAPH I CAL REASONS rOR
<br />CURB SIDEWALKS, AND RECOMMENDED THAT THE PETITION rOR A CURB SIDEWALK BE DENIED ANa THAT
<br />THE SIDEWALK BE INSTALLED ONE rOOT 'ROM THE PROPERTY LINE.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />'!
<br />
<br />7. PETITION F'OR PAVING THE. ALLEY BETWEEN IQTH AND 17TH AVENUES rROM HILYARD TO ALDER
<br />STREETS - THE COMMITTEE VIEWED THE AREA COVERED BY A PETITION rOR THE PAVING or THE ALLEY
<br />BETWEEN 16TH AND 17TH, AVENUES F'ROM HILYARD TO ALDER STREETS ON WHICH 59.64 PER CENT or
<br />THE TOTAL'PROP~RTY OWNERSHI'P HAD SI GNED.. I T; WAS NOTED THAT THI S WAS A F'.OURTEEN rOOT
<br />ALLEY.AND THAT THE P.AVINGOr THE ALLEY WOULD DEFINITELY CLEAN .UP THE NEIGHBORHOOD -AND
<br />PROVIDE BETTER MEANS or INGRESS AND EGRESS TO INTERIOR PROPERTIES.
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />IT WAS THE RECOMMENDATION or THE COMMITTEE THAT THE ORDINANCES INITIATING THIS ALLEY
<br />IMPROVEMENT BE PASSED.
<br />
<br />8. SIDEWAL:K ON HILYARD STREET BETWEEN 22ND AND 23RD AVENUES - THE CITY MANAGER EXPLAINED
<br />THAT ON THE WEST SIDE or HILYARD SJREET BETWEEN 22ND AND 23RD AVENUES THERE I,S ONE 'LOT
<br />IN 'RONT or WHICH A SIDEWALK HAD NOT BEEN CONSTR~CTED, AND THAT A CONSIDERABLE NUMBER Of
<br />PEOPLE USING ADJACENT SIDEWALKS, AS WELL AS STUDENTS GOING TO AND FROM SCHOOL) HAVE
<br />INDICATED THAT A SIDEWALK IS NEEDED THROUGH THIS AREA. THERE IS NO PETITION OUTSTANDING
<br />ON THIS IMPROVEMENT.
<br />
<br />THE COMMI TTEE' VI EWED THE AREA, AND'REC.OMMENDED THAT A. 'SI DEWALK BE CONSTRUCTED.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />9. OrF:ER BY PAClrl,C BUILDERS, INCORPORATED '(COMMERCE INVESTMENT, INCORPORATED) rOR
<br />TWO LOTS or CI TY OWNED PROPER.TY - THE CITY ~ANAGER, EXPLA I NEQ' HE- HAD AN orrER rROM
<br />PAClrl~ BUILDERS) INCORPORATED, TO PURCHASE LOT 12, BLOCK 5 AND LOT 19, BLOCK 6 OF'
<br />STOREY'S SUBDIVISION TO COLLEGE CREST ADDITION, LOCATED ON JACKSON STREET BETWEEN. 24TH
<br />AND 26TH AVENUES, rOR THE SUM or $1,200.00 rOR BOTH LOTS, WITH PAYMENT TO BE MADE' UPON
<br />DELIVERY or A BARGAIN AND SALE DEED, ALL ASSESSMENTS TO BE PAID. IT WAS POINTED OUT.
<br />THAT THIS WAS A COUNTER OfF'ER TO A PROPOSAL TO SELL EACH LOT rOR THE SUM OF' $550.00
<br />EACH WITH A BARGAI~ AND SALE DEED VITH THE LOTS, SUBJECT TO ALL OUTSTANDING ASSESSME~TS.
<br />THESE ASSESSMENTS CURRENTLY AMOUNT TO $281.33 ON LOT, 12, BLOCK 5, AND. $227.62 ON LO,T 19,
<br />BLOCK 6, WITH AN ADDITIONAL ASSESSMENT rORTHCOMING rOR THE PAVING or JACKSON STREET.
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />~
<br />
|