Laserfiche WebLink
<br />21.0 <br /> e <br /> PARK-AIRE SUBIH VI SI ON; AND ~ 01 SCUSSI ON REGARDI NG PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD' F'ROM AUGUSTA STREET TO I <br /> LAUREL. HILL DRIVE WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS F'OLLOWS: <br /> , <br /> "PRESENT: CO~NCILMEN GODLOVE, WATSON, SHEARER, AND SHISLER; CITY MANAGER; CITY <br /> ENGINEER; 'CITY'RECORDER; PLANNING CONSULTANT; MR. K. M TAYLOR, ROLLING PIN BAKERY; AND <br /> MR. DAN WYANTOF'THE EUGENE REGISTER-GUARD. <br /> , <br /> I . . REQUEST'B~ ROLLING.'PIN BAKERY 'OR StC~ND'CURB CUT AT I 663:WEST 6T~ AVENUE ~T~E <br /> REPRESENTATIVES OF' THE ,COMMITTEE VltWED THE LOCATION W~ERE THE ROLLING PIN BAKERY ~Aci <br /> REQUESTED A SECOND CURB C\:IT AND I'T WAS THEI R CONCLUSION THAT THERE IS INADEQUATE SPACE <br /> TO PROVIDE F'OR A SECOND CUT AND A TURNING AREA W~ICHWOULDBE ADEQUATE TO ALLOW CUSTOMER I <br /> SERVICE FROM AN AUTOMOBILE. I <br /> MR~ K; M. TAYlOR'OF' THE ROLLING PIN BAKERY WAS PRESENT'AND ti,SCUSSED THE SITUATION <br /> WITH THE COMMITTEE AND IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE MATTER BE HELD IN COMMITTEE FOR FURTHER <br /> STUDY. . <br /> 2. REQUEST FOR CONTINUATION OF' F'RANCHISE BY CENTRAL.HEATING COMPANY - THE SUBJECT OF AN It <br /> EXTENSION OF THE F'RANCHISE F'OR CENTRAL HEATING COMPANY FOR STEAM SERVICE WAS AGAIN <br /> DISCUSSED BY THE COMMITTEE. THE CITY MANAGER INDICATED THAT THE COUNCIL, SOME YEARS AGO" <br /> HAD SET A BASIC FRANCHISE FEE OF APPROXIMATELY TWO PER CENT FOR ALL FRANCHISES IN THE CITY <br /> AND FURTHER INDICATED THAT THE CITY ATTORNEY'WAS OF THE OPINION THAT IT WAS NECESSARY TO <br /> CHARGE A FEE, BUT THAT. THERE WAS NO NECtSSITY OF ~ESTRICTING THE OPERATIONS OF THE F'IRM TO I <br /> THE DOWNTOWN AREA IF' THEY DESIRED AN UNRESTRICTED FRANCHISE. IT WAS LIKEWISE .POINTED OUT <br /> THAT IN THE OPINION OF THE CITY ATTORNEY A TEN YEAR FRANCHISE WAS THE LONGEST WHICH SHOULD <br /> BE GRANTED. <br /> , <br /> THE COMMI TTEE 01 SCUSSED THE MATTER AND RECOMMENDED THAT THE CENTRAL HEAT! NG COMPANY <br /> BE GRANTED A TEN YEAR FRANCHISE, SUCH FRANCHISE TO BE UNRESTRICTED AS ,TO AREA AND THAT THE <br /> FRANCH~SE PAYMENT BE BASED ON ONE PER CENT OF THE GROSS REVENUE OF SUCH COMPANY. ' , <br /> 3. REQUEST BY SCHOOL DISTRICT NUMBER 504 TO CLOSE THE ALLEY BETWEEN PEARL AND HIGH STREETS <br /> FOR A DISTANCE OF ONE-HALF BLOCK FROM 7TH AVENUE NORTH - THE REQUEST BY SCHOOL DISTRICT <br /> NUMBER 504 (SCHOOL,DISTRICT NUMBER FOUR) WAS DISCUSSED BY THE COMMITTEE. <br /> No 'COMCLUSI ON WAS REACHED AND I T WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THI SMATTER 'BE'HELD IN <br /> COMMITTEE. <br /> 4. REQUEST BY ALLEN G. AND FLORENCE T. LARSON ~OR PAYMENT OF A PORTION OF A STORM SEWER, <br /> INSTALLED PRIVATELy,-:UNDER THE SIDEWALK AT. 2581 HI LYARD STREET -'A COMMUNI CAT! ON FROM ALLEN <br /> G. AND FLORENCE T. LARSON WAS PRESENTED TO THE COMMITTEE IN WHICH THE PETITIONERS REQUESTED <br /> THAT THE CITY RET~'BURSE THEM FOR 'THE COST OF STORM SEWER PIPE INSTALLED UNDER THE SIDEWALK <br /> AT THE ABOVE, ADDRESS WHICH HAS 'NOW BEEN INCORPORATED AS ONE END OFA STORM SEWER. THE <br /> REQUEST MADE BY THE LARSONS'IS THAT THE CITY REIMBURSE ,THEM FOR THE COST OF THE PIPE WHICH <br /> WAS INSTALLED PRIVATELY PRIOR TO THE TIME THAT THE CITY STORM SEWER SYSTEM WAS EXTENDED TO <br /> THE AREA. <br /> THE COMMITTEE DtSCUSSED~THE MATTER AND- INDICATED THAT THE WORK, AS DONE BY THE LARSONS, I <br /> WAS DONE AT THE CONVENIENCE OF THE PEOPLE INVOLVED AT THE TIME IT WAS DONE AND THAT THE' <br /> COMMITTEE DID NOT FEEL THAT THE GENERAL TAXPAYER COULD BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR A PRIVATE <br /> CONVENIENCE ATTHfS-TIME. ITWAS THEREFORE RECOMMENDEP THAT THE REQUEST BE :OENIED. <br /> r. .- <br /> -', <br /> 5. BIDS ON LOT 3, BLOCK 5,PARK-AIRE SUBDIVISION - IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT BIDS HAD BEEN <br /> RECEIVED ANDcOPENED ON JUNE 21, 1956 FOR THE SALE OF LOT 3, BLOCK 5, PARK-AIRE SUBDIVISION, <br /> BEING THE COMMERCIAL LOT CONTAINING APP.ROXIMATELYFIVE ACRES,' LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST' <br /> CQRNER OF ISTH AVENUE AND CHAMBERS STREET. - <br /> THREE elDS WERE RECEIVED FOR THIS PROPERTY FROM THE FOLL.WING, IN THE AMOUNTS <br /> INDICATED: . <br /> NORMAN.D. POHLL $,71,000.00 <br /> McKAY',S MARKETS' 67,500.00 <br /> _RODMAN AND UREY 20,000.00, , . <br /> .TH IS BID BE I NG FOR A F'R.ONTA,GE OF' 150 FEET BY 150 FEET AND WAS NOT ENTERED FOR THE <br /> WHOLE LOT. <br /> THE COMMI TTEE ''1)1 SCUS.SED THE BIDS AND RECOMMENDED THAT -THE BIDS BE REJECTED AS BE I.NG <br /> TOO LOW. ' ' <br /> '-- ----- ,'--- <br /> 6. 01 SCUSSI-ON REGARDING PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD FROM AUGUSTA STREET TO LAUREL HI LL DRI VE TO <br /> BE LOCATED I N THE VI C I NI TY OF LAUREL HI LL SCHOOL - THE COMMI.TTEE AGAI N DfsCUSSED THE MATTER I <br /> OF' THE ACCESS ROAD WHICH WOULD EXTEND FROM THE SOUTH END OF AUGUS1A STREET IN THE VICINITY <br /> OF THE LAUREL HI LL SCHOOL TO LAUREL HI LL .DRI VE. AND WHI CH WOULD BE DES'I GNAT ED A's"'EAST' 25'TN <br /> AVENUE. " <br /> AFTER THIS OLSCUSSION I~WAS RECOMMENDED THAT EAS~ 25TH AVENUE BE OPENED.~ <br /> -. ~ . I <br /> ,I I <br /> , e <br /> , <br /> i <br /> I <br /> ~. <br />~ .. ~~ <br /> ~ ~- - - <br />