|
<br /> ,.... 1"''1. ~
<br /> (1 4
<br />e
<br /> 6/22/59
<br />-~
<br />----~-
<br />__ - . - - - ________ n__ - --. ~
<br />- - :1
<br /> !
<br />I I' I
<br /> d I
<br /> ," THEY COULD SET UP CERTAIN REASONABLE CRITERIA FOR SUCH A LEASE. IN THE DIS- II
<br /> ,
<br /> [I CUSSION THERE WAS SOME QUESTION AS TO WHAT THE CITY'S POLICY SHOULD BE, "
<br /> , II
<br /> ,! WHETHER THE GASOLINE TAX SHOULD BE GIVEN UP, BUT A GENERAL FEELING THAT THE
<br /> 'I I,
<br /> :1 VIOLATION SHOULD BE CORRECTED. IT WAS RECOMMENDED THIS ITEM BE REFERRED TO Ii
<br /> " Ii
<br /> ,I THE AIRPORT COMMISSION'fOR STUDY AND RECOMMENDATION.
<br /> "
<br /> 'i
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MOYER THAT ITEM 3 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT I,
<br />00 I!
<br /> BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED, COUNCILMAN WILSON VOTING NAY. !I
<br />N Ii
<br /> I'
<br />~ 4. RECONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE TO FENCE PRIVATELY OWNED SWIMMING POOLS AND ,I
<br />U I , 'I
<br /> I I
<br />c.c ! OTHER WATER HAZARDS - AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCILWOMAN LAURIS THIS ITEM WAS :1
<br />c:.o AGAIN BROUGHT TO THE COMMITTEE FOR CONSIDERATION. FOLLOWING SOME GENERAL II
<br /> " IT WAS MOVED BY MR. WILSON SECONDED BY MR. :1
<br /> DISCUSSION ON THE SUBJECT, II
<br /> i I
<br /> MOLHOLM THAT THE CITY ATTORNEY BE INSTRUCTED TO DRAW AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING :1
<br /> fOR A 4' FENCE AROUND PRIVATE SWIMMING POOLS IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS WITH SUCH II
<br /> , FENCE TO BE SO CONSTRUCTED THAT CHILDREN COULD NOT CRAWL UNDER IT AND WITH il
<br />e !
<br /> .i A SELF-LOCKING LATCH AT LEAST 40" ABOVE THE GROUND. ON MOTION BY MRS.LAURIS II
<br /> " "
<br /> ; SECONDED BY MR. CHATT, IT WAS MOVED THE ORIGINAL MOTION BE AMENDED TO REQUIRE II
<br /> , THAT FENCES OR SCREENS BE REQUIRED ON fiSH PONDS OR OTHER DECORATIVE BODIES d
<br /> OF WATER OVER IS" DEEP. ON VOTE ON THE AMENDMENT TO THE ORIGINAL MOTION, 'I
<br /> j MOTION CARRIED~BY A VOTE Of 5-4, AND ON VOTE ON THE ORIGINAL MOTION AS II
<br /> 11
<br /> I AMENDED, MOTION CARRIED. II
<br /> I
<br />I I
<br /> I IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT ITEM 4 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT 'I
<br /> !'
<br /> " BE APPROVED. II
<br /> q
<br /> Ii
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. SWANSON TO AMEND THE MOTION TO REQUIRE \1
<br /> WOODEN FENCES TO BE OF A VERTICAL MEMBER TYPE AND IF WIRE fENCES ARE USED, THAT THEY
<br /> BE OF A PATTERN AND TYPE TO D1SCOURAGE CLIMBING, AND ACCEPTABLE BY THE BUILDING IN- Ii
<br /> I
<br /> " SPECTOR.
<br /> " I'
<br /> : ON VOTE ON THE MOTION TO AMEND, MOTION CARRIED. II
<br /> !I
<br /> I il
<br /> I
<br /> " ON VOTE ON THE ORIGINAL MOTION TO APPROVE THE COMMITTEE REPORT AS AMENDED, MOTION il
<br /> : CARRIED.
<br /> I I,
<br /> ., II
<br /> 2 .! 5. REQUEST FOR POLICY DETERMINATION ON CONTROLLED ACCESS RIGHTS-Of-WAY -
<br /> I THE DIRECTOR Of PUBLIC WORKS EXPLAINED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION AT !!
<br /> THEIR REGULAR MEETING HELD ON JUNE 2, 1959 HAD REQUESTED THAT A POLICY "
<br /> "
<br /> "
<br /> 'I
<br /> DETERMINATION BE MADE WITH REfERENCE TO THE PLATTING OF CONTROLLED ACCESS il
<br /> RIGHTS-Of-WAY ALONG THE NO~TH SiDE OF THE 4TH ADDITION TO KNOB HILL FOR
<br /> 30TH AVENUE BEniEEN ~NIVERSITY AND ONYX STREETS. THE PLANNING COMMISSION 'I
<br /> ii
<br /> DESIRED THAT A ONE FOOT RESTRAINING STRIP OF LAND BE DEDICATED IN ORDER II
<br /> THAT LOTS ABUTTING DIRECTLY UPON 30TH AVENUE EAST WOULD NOT HAVE DIRECT II
<br /> I'
<br /> ACCESS ONTO 30TH AVENUE. IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT IF THIS WERE TO BE ADOPTED, il
<br /> THE CITY WOULD BE LIABLE FOR THAT PORTION OF ANY PAVING ASSESSMENT THAT 'I
<br /> :i Ii
<br />I 'i WOULD ORDINARILY BE LEVIED AGAINST THE LOTS ADJACENT TO THISPROPERTY,AND
<br /> FURTHER WHETHER THE ONE FOOT RESTRAINING STRIP WOULD SUfFICE IN CONTROLL I NG II
<br /> ! THE ACCESS ONTO THE STREET. 'I
<br /> , I,
<br /> , II
<br /> 1 "
<br /> I IT WAS ALSO POINTED OUT THAT THE SUBDIVIDER IS QUITE ANXIOUS TO FILE THE il
<br /> : PLAT AND CLARI~ICATION IS NEEDED BEFORE THE CITY ENGINEER CAN RELEASE THE II
<br /> PLAT. II
<br /> SOME DISCUSSION WAS HAD ON THIS SUBJECT, AND IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT AT ii
<br />e I . THE PRESENT TIME THIS WOULD BE THE ONLY PORTION OF CONTROLLED ACCESS II
<br /> 'I :1
<br /> " RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR 30TH AVENUE. THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE CIT~ il
<br /> il
<br /> I ATTORNEY WORK OUT AN AGREEMENT WHICH WOULD RETAIN THE CONTROLLED ACCESS I'
<br /> t, II
<br /> FEATURE ALO~G THE PROPERTIES ABUTTING 30TH AVENUE IF THE STREET WERE MADE
<br /> " A CONTROLLED ACCESS R'GHT;':Or-WAY, SUT W~TH'::THE PROV:~'SlON'::rffAli,:lr; IT "SF ;1
<br /> :1
<br /> I NOT CONTROLLED ACCESS, THE PROPERTY WOULD BE RETURN~D TO THE OWNERS OF
<br /> :, ABUTTING PROPERTY. II
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT ITEM 5 Of THE COMM I TTEE REPORT
<br /> BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. !I
<br /> " II
<br /> "
<br /> 3 6. PETITION TO PAVE CRESTA DE RUTA STREET FROM NORTH BOUNDARY OF CAPITOL :1
<br /> ~! HILL ADD I T.I ON TO THE SOUTH OF LOT 2, BLOCK 4, AND LOT 2, BLOCK 3 -, IT II
<br /> il WAS EXPLAINED THAT THE COUNCIL ON MAY 25, 1959 HAD REQUESTED THAT PRO- 11
<br /> ! PERTY OWNERS IN THE CRESTA DE RUTA AREA BE CONTACTED AS TO THE1R DESIRES II
<br /> FOR THE PAVING. OF CRESTA DE RUTA STREET., IT WAS ALSO EXPLAINED THAT THE "
<br />I :1
<br /> PETITION HAD ORIGINALLY BEEN PRESENTED CONTAINING SIGNATURES OF OWNERS II
<br /> OF 50% OF THE TOTAL FRONT. FOOTAGE Of PROPERTY TO BE ASSESSED,' AND WITH THE :1
<br /> MORE RECENT LETTERS TO PROPERTY HOLDERS IN'THE AREA, THIS PERCENTAGE HAS II
<br /> ;1 BEEN I NCREASED TO 69%.- BASED ON THIS REPORT THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT I:
<br /> I CRESTA DE RUTA STREET Bt PAVED AS INDICATED AND THAT THE NECESSAR~ORDI- "
<br /> " '\
<br /> I NANCES INITIATING THE PROJECT BE PASSED. \,
<br /> " il
<br /> '!
<br /> i IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT ITEM 6 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT II
<br /> "
<br /> "
<br />- '! BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. 'I
<br /> >{ !1
<br /> :i
<br /> \i
<br /> 'r II
<br /> ..~
<br />
|