|
<br />~88
<br /> e
<br /> , 6/22/59
<br /> -~ -
<br />--f( ~ - -- -- F
<br /> I
<br /> 11
<br /> II I
<br />I I 7. PETITION FOR SANITARY SEWER FROM THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF CAPITOL HILL ADDITION \1
<br /> TO THE SOUTH END OF CAPITOL DRIVE AND BETWEEN LOWER AND UPPER CAPITOL DRIVE - Ii
<br /> IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT AT THE MEETING or MAY 1959 THE COUNCIL HAD REQUESTED I,
<br /> II, t!
<br /> I THAT ADDITIONAL PROPERTY HOLDERS BE CONTACTED WITH RESPECT TO THEIR DESIRES FOR ,I
<br /> ~ ,
<br /> ,
<br /> SAN ITARY SEWER IN THE CAPITOL HILL ADDITION AND THAT LETTERS HAD BEEN SENT TO I,
<br /> I SEVEN OWNERS, riVE OF WHOM FAVOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT, ONE or WHOM OPPOSED, I:
<br /> AND ONE OF WHOM COULD NOT BE CONTACTED. THE ORIGINAL PETITION WITH THE ADDED ,
<br /> I'
<br /> NUMBER WHO HAVE STATED THEY DESIRE A SANITARY SEWER HAS A TOTAL OF APPROXIMATELY
<br /> i 80% IN FAVOR OF SUCH SEWER. BASED ON' THIS, THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE
<br /> I
<br /> I SEWER LINE BE INSTALLED AND THAT THE NECESSARY ORDINANCES INITIATING THE PROJECT
<br /> I
<br /> I BE PASSED.
<br /> I,
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY ~R. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT ITEM 7 or THE COMMITTEE REPORT
<br /> II
<br /> Ii BE APPRO VED. MOTION CARRIED.
<br /> I
<br /> MR. SWANSON LEFT THE MEETING AT THIS POINT. e
<br /> j
<br />211 8. REQUEST FOR CITY TO PURCHASE SMALL PIECE or RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE or "
<br /> I!
<br /> I 28TH AVENUE AT WASHINGTON STREET - IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT A CONTRACT WAS TO BE j,
<br /> ,
<br /> I LET FOR THE PAVING or 28TH AVENUE FROM WASHINGTON STREET TO LINCOLN STREET, BUT :
<br /> I THERE IS A SMALL PARCEL OF PROPERTY IN THE OWNERSHIP Of DOUGLAS MARX, LOCATED I'
<br /> I 'I
<br /> ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 28TH AVENUE AT WASHINGTON STREET AND EAST or WASHINGTON , I
<br /> 1 I'
<br /> , - . . ,I
<br /> I! STREET, ON WHICH A FULL RIGHT-OF-WAY HAS NOT BEEN DEDICATED. THE OWNERS or Ii
<br /> THIS PROPERTY ARE NOT WILLING TO DEDICATE THE LAND AT NO COST AND REQUEST THAT 'I
<br /> A rEE OF $200.00 BE PAID FOR SUCH DEDICATION. "
<br /> I Ii
<br /> I II
<br /> ,I
<br /> i A MAP SHOWING THE AREA WAS SHOWN TO THE COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED :1
<br /> 'I
<br /> :1
<br /> I THE PURCHASE OF THE SMALL PARCEL or LAND AT A PRICE OF $200.00. 'I
<br /> ,.
<br /> ot
<br /> , I!
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT ITEM 8 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT I:
<br /> I ROLLCALL VOTE. ,I
<br /> I BE APPROVED. ALL COUNCILMEN PRESENT VOTING AYE, MR. SWANSON ABSENT, ,I
<br /> 'i
<br /> \,
<br /> MOTION CARRIED. "
<br /> I ii
<br /> I :1
<br />3 !I 9. BOARD Of ApPEALS REPORT - JUNE 10 , 1959: 11
<br /> REQUEST rOR VARIANCE IN SIZE OF SIGN AND SETBACK REQUIREMENT FOR SIGN j:
<br /> II A. "
<br /> ,I
<br /> MADE BY REV. LOWELL R. HUMPHRIES, BEREAN BAPTIST -CHURCH, 1210 CHAMBERS I,
<br /> :i
<br /> STREET - IT WAS I~DICAT~D THAT THE CHURCH HAD REQUESTED A VARIANCE "
<br /> II ;1
<br /> I' FROM THE 15' SETBACK REQUIREMENT ON FRONT YARDS. TO CONSTRUCT A SIGN 7' I!
<br /> I'
<br /> i FROM THE rRONT PROPERTY LINE, AND ALSO REQUESTED A VARIANCE FROM THE -I
<br /> ,
<br /> i NORMAL I 2 SQ. FT . SIGN TO ALLOW A SIGN CONTAINING 87.5 SQ.FT. IN AREA. ii
<br /> :1
<br /> I . THIS ITEM HAD BEEN APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF ApPEALS, BUT ArTER CON- , ~
<br /> I :,
<br /> SIDERATION AND VIEWING OF THE P~AN FOR THIS SIGN, THE COMMITTEE ~EeOM- I,
<br /> I'
<br /> I MENDED THAT THE REQUESTED VARIANCE BE DENIED.
<br /> t
<br /> ,
<br /> I IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT ITEM 9A OF THE COMMITTEE RE-
<br /> i PORT BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. I
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br />4! 10. AUTHORIZATION FOR PROPER CITY OFFICIALS TO SIGN CONTRACT WITH CORNELL, J'
<br /> "
<br /> II "
<br /> HOWLAND, HAYES & MERRyrlELD TO FURNISH ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CON- "
<br /> I "
<br /> STRUCTION OF RAW SEWAGE PUMPING STATION AT THE NORTH END OF POLK STREET - 01
<br /> I'
<br /> ,I
<br /> IT WAS STATED THAT A PROPOSED CONTRACT rOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE ,I
<br /> i "
<br /> CONSTRUCTION or A RAW SEWAGE PUMPING STATION HAD BEEN REVIEWED BY THE H
<br /> I ,
<br /> CITY ATTORNEY AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF AND WAS BELIEVED TO BE IN ORDER. I'
<br /> \:
<br /> \ THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE PROPER CITY OFrlCIALS BE AUTHORIZED TO I, e
<br /> I . ,I
<br /> ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR THE ABOVE STIPULATED PURPOSE. j:
<br /> , !j
<br /> I
<br /> I IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT ITEM 10 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT I,
<br /> I jf
<br /> II BE APPROVED. ROLLCALL VOTE. ALL COUNCILMEN PRESENT VOTI~G AYE, MOTION CARRIED, MR. "
<br /> "
<br /> SWANSON ABSENT. "
<br /> ;1
<br /> it
<br /> il
<br /> 'I
<br /> I,
<br /> , MR. SWANSON RETURNEp TO THE MEETING AT THIS POINT. ii
<br /> il
<br /> 'I I.
<br /> I, 'I
<br />5 II I I. RECONSIDERATION OF CHARGES FOR SWIM PASSES AT MUNICIPAL POOLS - THE PARKS & ! ~
<br /> RECREAT ION SUPER I NTENDENT STATED niAT THE REV I SED SWIMM I NG POOL PASS rEES "
<br /> II i!
<br /> HAD AROUSED A GREAT DEAL Of CONTROVERSY AMONG -P~RENTS AND OTHERS SINtE IT "
<br /> I:
<br />\, LiMITS THE NUMBER OF SWIMS THAT A PASS HOLDER CAN HAVE ON A GIVEN PASS. !(
<br /> :1
<br />11 THIS CONTROVERSY HAS BEEN EXPRESSED IN LETTERS TO THE MAYOR, TO THE CITY II
<br /> MANAGER, AND IN A NUMBER Of TELEPHONE CALLS TO THE OFFICES OF THEPARKS & II I
<br /> I'
<br />I RECREATION DEPARTMENT. THE PA~KS & RECREATION SUPERINTENDENT STATED - . IT II
<br /> .:
<br /> WAS NOT THE ORIGINAL INTENT TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF REVENUE FROM THE "
<br />I SWIMMING POOLS THAT ORIGINALLY BROUGHT HIM TO RECOMMEND THE EXISTING SYSTEM, II
<br />j il
<br /> BUT RATHER TO AID IN CONTROLLING THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE USING A SWIMMING POOL ii
<br />I PASS. HE STATED THERE WERE TWO POSSIBLE METHODS OF SOLUTION, ONE TO RETURN 1:
<br /> I,
<br />I TO THE SYSTEM PREVIOUSLY USED, OR SECONDLY TO ISSUE ADDITIONAL PASSES WHICH "
<br />I iI
<br />1 WOULD BE PUNCHED EACH TIME A SWIMMER APPEARED TO SWIM BUT WITHOUT ANY ADDI- I:
<br />\
<br />\ TIONAL FEE FOR SUCH PASS. I' -
<br /> If
<br /> I "
<br /> i "
<br /> I
<br />~.i
<br />
|