|
<br /> ~.)
<br /> ,It
<br /> e
<br /> 7/13/59 ,
<br /> ---"
<br /> IT . ,
<br /> "
<br /> !!
<br /> \t I
<br /> I WAS RECOMMENDED TH,IS MATTER BE SENT BACK TO THE PLANN I NG COMM I SS I ON fOR MORE II
<br /> I'
<br /> I INfORMATION WITH RESPECT TO THE PLANS fOR DEVELOPMENT Of THE LOT AND WHAT I
<br /> WILL HAPPEN .TO THE WAREHOUSE BUILDING ON THE REAR. , MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOU~LY. :,
<br /> I I'
<br /> "
<br /> i IT WAS MOVED BY MR.. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MOYER THAT ITEM 2B Of THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE ,i
<br /> 11 APPROVED. MOT I ON CARR I Eo.., I:
<br /> 'I
<br /> il ,i
<br /> I II C. R[QUEST BY C. M. UREY TO REZONE LOTS 10 TO 18, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 6, AMENDED
<br /> ! PLAT Of CITY OUTLOOK ADDITION (EAST :SIDEOf ,HILYARD STREET BETWEEN 29TH ,AND
<br /> ,
<br /> I 30TH AVENUES - ,2909, T.O AND INCLUDING 2995 HILYARD STREET) .F'ROM RA OUTER
<br /> I
<br /> I RESIDENTIAL TO C-I LIMITED COMMERCIAL - COMM1TTEE MEMBERS OBSERVED THE SITE
<br /> II OF' THE REQUESTED REZONING, AND IT WAS STAT,ED THATT.HE PLANNING COMMISSION
<br /> I HAD RECOMMENDED DENIAL Of ,THE REQ.UEST. SOME DISCUSSION WAS HAD ON. THE MATTER,
<br /> i AND THERE WAS SOME QUESTION AS TO THE NECESSITY OR NEED fOR ADDITIONAL COMMER-
<br /> I CIAL AREA AT THIS LOCATION. IT WAS RECOMMENo.ED THAT THE ACTION Of THE PLAN-
<br /> NING COMMISSION BE .UPHELD DENYING THE REQUESTED ~EZONING. MOTION CARR.IED,
<br /> MR. WILSON VOTING NAY. e
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY, .MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY. MRS..LAURIS THAT ITEM 2C Of THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE
<br /> APPROVED. MOTION ,CARRIED, MR. WILSON VOTING NAY. i:
<br /> i'
<br /> 2 D. REQUEST BY MILTON O. JACKSON TO REZONE THE NORTH 90 F'EET Of LOTS I AND 2, Ii
<br /> "
<br /> BLOCK 3, TESHNERS ADDITION (SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 18T.H AVENUE AND PEARL STREET) ,I
<br /> "
<br /> fROM CR COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL TO C-3P COMMERCIAL - IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT I: I
<br /> THE PLANNING COMMISSION ~AD RECOMMENDED THISREZON1NG BE DENI~D. COMM I.TTEE
<br /> MEMBERS VIEWED THE ~ITE Of THE REQUESTED REZONLNG, AND MR. JACKSON WITH MR.HoffMAN,
<br /> HIS ATTORNEY, APPEARED BEfORE THE COMMITTEE. MR. HOFfMAN STATED THAT MR..JACKSON
<br /> HAD TRI,ED FOR SOME PERIOD OF TIME TO SELL THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION WITH THE
<br /> I COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL ZONING BUT HAD BEEN ,UNABLE TO DO SO, AND IT APPEARED THAT ii
<br /> II THE INCREASED DEVELOPMENT OF' A COMMERCIAL NATURE IN THE AREA HAS CHANGED THE
<br /> II COMPLIXION Of THE AREA AND THE REQUEST,ED REZONLNG WOULD NOT BE OUT .OF KEEPING
<br /> WITH THAT FOUND ON THE NORTH SIDE O~ 18TH AVENUE. I T, WAS FURTHER INDICATED
<br /> jl THAT OFfERS HAVE BEEN MADE TO PURCHASE THE PROPERTY FOR SERVICE STATION, RE-
<br /> ,I TAIL TIRE STORE, OR OTHER SIMILAR USES. IN.THE COURSE ,Of THE DISC.USSIQN IT ,WAS.
<br /> I
<br /> i POINTED OUT THAT 18TH A~ENUi WA~ Q~LGINALLY ENVISI~NED AS T~E DIV1Di~~~INE .
<br /> I BETWEEN THE.' .C,~3 ..ZON i NG AND THE .CR, ZON I NG. 'THE ~R ~ONIN~ ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
<br /> I 18TH AVENUE WAS ESTABLISHED AS.A BUFFER ZONE SINCE: .IT WAS NOT THE DESI:RE THAT
<br /> ;\ ' ' .
<br /> BUSINESS BE ALLOWEDTOQ CLOSE TO .THE HIGH S~HOOL.
<br /> Ii
<br /> Ii MR. HOFF'MAN ALSO PO.INTED :OUT THAT THE POTENTIAL CROSSTOWN ARTERIALS BOTH TO THE
<br /> II
<br /> :1 SOUTH AND TO THE EAST WOULD HAVE ,A ,TENDENCY TO LIMIT THE USE .OF THE PROPERTY
<br /> !I
<br /> II fOR CR ZONE, ~SAGES. ON MOTION THAT THE REQUESTE~ REZONING BE GRANTED, THE Ii
<br /> MOTION WAS DEF'EATED WITH MESSRS. WILSON AND..CHATT VOTING AYE, COUNCILMEN LAURIS, ,
<br /> Ii
<br /> i !:
<br /> i MOLHOLM, MOYER, SWANSON AND SHEARER VOTING NAY. I:
<br /> i,
<br /> I "
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT ITEM 20 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE ,
<br /> , ~ i
<br /> I [:
<br /> , APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED, MR. WILSON VOTING NAY.
<br /> , ,I
<br /> I I'
<br /> , 'I I
<br /> I
<br /> 3 I I
<br /> E. REQUEST BY ALLEN R. CASADY TO REZONE LOT 20, BLOCK 22i CITY OUTLOOK ADDITION
<br /> I
<br /> I ,(SOUTHEAST ,CORNER OF 27TH AVENUE AND HARRIS.STREET) f.ROM R-I SINGLE fAMILY
<br /> ! RESIDENTIAL TO R-3 MULTIPLE fAMILY RESIDENTlAL.- IT WAS INDICATED THAT THE
<br /> I PLANNING COMMISSION HAD RECOMMENDED DENIAL OF .THE REQUESTED REZONI.NG. COM-
<br /> I MITTEE MEMBERS VIEWED THE AREA AND NOTED THAT SINCE IT IS A CORNER LOT, 11:
<br /> 1 IS POSSIBLE TO BUILD A DUPLEX ON IT AT THIS TIME. IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT
<br /> I ACTION OF .THE PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING THE REQUESTED REZONING BE SUSTAINED.
<br /> I
<br /> ! MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. , -
<br /> I,
<br /> ! 11
<br /> i IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDE~ BY MR. CHATT THATITEM2E OF THE COMMITTEE REpORT BE, :1,
<br /> :1 APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. I:
<br /> 4 il :1
<br /> I
<br /> ~ F. REQUEST BY NORMAN f. SCHNEIDER TO REZONE LOT I. BLOCK 9, DRIVERTON ADDITION' "
<br /> :,
<br /> II (SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 18TH AVENUE AND HILYARD STREET) fROM R-3 MULTIPLE it
<br /> "
<br /> "
<br /> fAMILY RESIDENTIAL 'TO CR COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL - COMMITTEE MEMBERS VIEWED Ii
<br /> I THE SITE, AND IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAD RECOMMENDED 'I
<br /> "
<br /> I il
<br /> I DENIAL Of THE REQUESTED REZONING. MR. SCHNEIDER APPEARED BEFORE THE COM- "
<br /> "
<br /> j MITTEE AND PRESENTED A ,PROPOSED PLOT PLAN Of THE .USETO BE MADE ,Of THE :i
<br /> ,I
<br /> PROPERTY WHICH, AS ENVISIONED AT THIS TIME, IS fOR DOCTORS' OFFICES. HE STATED. THAT. "
<br /> ,:
<br /> I AS PLANNED AT THIS TIME EGRESS fROM 18TH AVENUE:WOULD BE AT THE .ALLEY BETWEEN HIL- If
<br /> I YARD AND PATTERSON STREETS WITH A CURB CUT AT THE EASTERLY END ONTO HILYARD STREET.
<br /> I I'
<br /> ! HE EXPLAINED THE REASON fOR REQUESTING THE CHANGE TO CR ZONING WAS THE DIFFERENCE "
<br /> "
<br /> I I.
<br /> I IN SETBACK REQUIREMENTS. MR. ,SCHNEIDER ALSO STATED HIS CLIENTS WOULD NOT ACCEPT !
<br /> I
<br /> 11 ., I
<br /> A VARIANCE BECAUSE Of THE RESTRICTIONS ON A VARIANCE AND ALSO INDICATED THERE IS !i
<br /> ' .
<br /> A POSSIBJLITY THE BUILDING MIGHT BE .SET BACK TO THE:PROPERTY LINE ON ITHE SOUTH. "
<br /> 1
<br /> I ,I
<br /> I CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION,WASHAD ON THIS SUBJECT, AND THE USES WHICH MIGHT BE "
<br /> I I;
<br /> j MADE, Of A PROPERTY ZONED CR WERE READ TO THE COMMITTEE. THE COMMITTEE RECOM- Ii
<br /> t
<br /> ! MENDED THAT THE REQUESTED REZONING F'ROM R-3 MULTIPLE fAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO CR I'
<br /> I'
<br /> i COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. I:
<br /> I i;
<br /> I I:
<br /> \ IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT ITEM 2f" Of" THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE !i -
<br /> i APPROVED. ;;
<br /> II
<br /> :,
<br /> ~"
<br /> ;:
<br />
|