<br />e
<br />
<br />1/25/60
<br />
<br />2:9'7,~
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />:1
<br />II
<br />"
<br />"
<br />~j
<br />
<br />'i
<br />i
<br />
<br />FLOW OF TRAFFIC, AND ELIMINATE A PORTION OF TRAFFIC CONGESTION ON BROADWAY WEST
<br />OF W,LLAMETTE STREET WHICH IS OCCASIONED BY PERSONS WISHING TO USE THE BANK
<br />FACILITIES AND TO PARK IN EXISTING SHORT TIME PARKING SPACES. IN THIS RESPECT
<br />THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER RECOMMENDED THAT AN ORDINANCE COMPARABLE TO THAT CURRENTLY
<br />IN fORCE IN THE CITY OF PORTLAND PROVIDING fOR REVOCABLE PERMITS FOR DRIVEUP
<br />BANKING FACILITIES BE ENACTED, THAT PARKING METERS #110,111,112 AND 113 ON THE
<br />NORTH SIDE OF BROADWAY WEST OF WILLAMETTE STREET BE REMOVED AND THE CURB PAINTED
<br />YELLOW TO DESIGNATE NO PARKING, AND THAT THE STREET BE MARKED AND APPROPRIATE
<br />SIGNS ERECTED DESIGNATING A LANE FOR BANK ZONE, CURB TELLER SERVICE ONLY. '
<br />
<br />:,!
<br />.,
<br />
<br />0':)
<br />C\l
<br />~r
<br />U
<br />~
<br />C;;;:)
<br />
<br />',j
<br />
<br />THE CITY ATTORNEY REPORTED IN HIS OPINION A REVOCABLE PERMIT WOULD BE NECESSARY
<br />AND FURTHER THAT IT WOULD BE NECESSARY THAT THE BANK INDEMNIFY THE CITY FOR ANY
<br />DAMAGE OR CLAIM WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY SUCH AN INSTALLATION.
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />, ,
<br />I
<br />\
<br />
<br />MR. LYNN MCCREADY, VICE-PRESIDENT AND MANAGER OF THE EUGENE MAIN BRANCH Of THE
<br />fiRST NATIONAL BANK OF OREGON, PRESENTED PLANS AND PICTURES Of THE PROPOSED IN-
<br />STALLATION AND ANSWERED QUESTIONS PERTAINING TO THE INSTALLATION. fOLLOWING
<br />SOME DISCUSSION IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE ALLOWING fOR A
<br />REVOCABLE PERMIT FOR THE INSTALLATION Of A DRIVEUP BANKING FeCILITY ON THE
<br />NORTH SIDE OF BROADWAY IN THE HALf BLOCK WEST Of WILLAMETTE STREET BE ,ADOPTED,
<br />AND THAT THE PARKING METER CHANGES, SIGNS AND CURB AND STREEf MARKING A'S RECOM-'
<br />MENDED BY THE TRAffiC ENGINEER BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT ITEM 4 Of THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE
<br />APPROVED., MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />,
<br />
<br />5.:,CONSIDERATION OF PROVIDING WHEEL CHAIR ACCESS TO,PARK BLOCKS - THE COMMITTEE
<br />HEARD A REPORT fROM THE 01 RECTOR Of PUBL I C WORKS IN WH I CH IT WAS STATED THAT
<br />THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AND THE ARCHITECTURAL fiRM Of WILMSEN & ENDICOTT
<br />WHO HAD DESIGNED THE PARK BLOCKS AREA HAD MET TO CONSIDER THE fEASIBILITY OF
<br />PROVIDING RAMPS TO EASE THE INGRESS AND EGRESS OF WHEEL CHAIRS TO AND fROM
<br />THE PARK BLOCKS. IT WAS POINTED OUT IN THE REPORT THAT A CONSIDERABLE HAZARD
<br />WOULD BE CREATED IF, RAMPS WERE TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE SIDEWALK AREA AND
<br />THAT If THEY WERE BUILT ACROSS THE GUTTERS, A DR~INAGE PROBLEM WOULD BE CREATED.
<br />THERE WAS ALSO DISCUSSED THE PROBLEM OF LOCATION AS TO CROSSWALKS. THE 01-
<br />RECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS REC~MMENDED THAT A CONTINUATION OF THE STUDY BE MADE TO
<br />DETERMINE HOW MUCH DEMAND THERE IS FOR SUCH WHEEL CHAIR ACCESS. IT WAS SUG-
<br />GESTED THAT MISS JOHNSON Of THE COUNCIL fOR THE AGING BE CONTACTED IN THISRE-
<br />GARD, AND A RECOMMENDATION TO CONDUCT A FURTHER STUDY WAS DEfEATED WITH COUNCIL-
<br />MEN MOLHOLM AND LAURIS VOTING AYE, COUNCILMEN SHEARER, CHATT AND MOYER VOTING N~~.
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEAR~R SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT ITEM 5 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE
<br />APPROVED.
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />IT WAS THEN MOVED BY MR. MOLHOLM SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT THE MATTER BE REFERRED TO
<br />COMMITTEE FOR FURTHER STUDY. MOTION,CARRIED 4-3, COUNCI~N WILSON ABSTAINING.
<br />
<br />I 2 6.
<br /> II
<br />e
<br /> 3 '~
<br /> "
<br />
<br />CONSIDERATION OF BOARD OF ApPEALS REPORT - JANUARY 13, 1960:
<br />A. REQUEST BY MRS. MABLE MOYER FOR VARIANCE IN SETBACK FROM FRONT LINE AT
<br />3240 fERRY STREET FROM 20'TO 17' - IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT MRS. MOYER HAD
<br />RECENTLY ACQUIRED PROPERTY fROM THE CITY AND THAT TO LOCATE A STRUCTURE,
<br />ON IT, IT WAS REQUESTED THAT THE ,HOUSE AND GARAGE BE SETBACK A DISTANCE
<br />OF 17' FROM THE FRONT PROPERTY LINE WHERE THE CODE NORMALLY REQUIRES A
<br />20' SETBACK FOR GARAGECAND A 15' SETBACK ,FOR A RESIDENCE. IT WAS FURTHER
<br />EXPLAINED THIS ITEM HAD BEEN TO THE BOARD Of ApPEALS WHO HAD RECOMMENDED,
<br />APPROVAL OF THE VARIANCE. THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THE BOARD Of ApPEALS
<br />BE UPHELD. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
<br />
<br />B. REQUEST BY DONALD NEILSON, 2296 CLEVELAND STREET, fOR VARIANCE IN LOT
<br />WIDTH fROM 60' TO 55' - IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT A REQUEST HAD BEEN ENTERED
<br />BY MR..DoNALD NEILSON.THAT HE BE ALLOWED TO BUILD A HOUSE AT THE ABOVE
<br />ADDRESS ON:A LOT WITH A 55' FRONTAGE AND 140' DEPTH., IT WAS POINTED OUT
<br />THAT THE TOTAL LOT AREA IS IN EXCESS OF THE 6000SQ.FT~ REQUIRED IN THE
<br />ZONING ORDINANCE, AND FURTHER POINTED OUT THAT THE, BoARD OF ApPEALS HAD
<br />RECOMMENDED APPROVAL. THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE ACIDION OF THE
<br />BoARD OF ApPEALS BE UPHELD. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ,
<br />
<br /> .:
<br /> "
<br /> 'I
<br />4 ; C.
<br />I
<br />
<br />REQUEST BY E. M. PORTERFIELD fOR VARIANCE IN LOT WIDTH TO DIVIDE A PAR-
<br />CEL Of LAND 150'XI20' LOCATED AT 19TH AVENUE AND MONROE STREET INTO THREE
<br />LOTS, EACH HAVING 50' fRONTAGE - IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT MR. PORTERFIELD
<br />CURRENTLY HAS THREE HOUSES WHICH ARE BUILT ON TWO LOTS, THE TOTAL OF THE
<br />TWO LOTS BEING 150'XI20' 'AND THAT,HE REQUESTS THAT HE BE ALLOWED TO DIVIDE
<br />THE LOTS INTO THREE 50X120' ,PARCELS. - SUCH DIVISION WOULD ALLOW EACH HOUSE
<br />TO BE ON A SEPARATE LOT. IT WAS fURTHER INDICATED THAT THE BOARD OF Ap-
<br />PEALS HAD RECOMMENDED A~PROVAL, AND AFTER SOME DISCUSSION IN W~ICK IT WAS
<br />STATED THAT UNDOUBTEDLY THE UPKEEP OF THE BUILDINGS WOULD BE BETTER IF
<br />SUCH A:DIVISION WERE ALLOWED, IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE BOARD OF ApPEALS
<br />BE SUSTAINED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
<br />
<br />IT, WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT ITEMS 6A, 6B AND 6C OF THE COM-
<br />MITTEE REPORT BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />'I
<br />!I
<br />1\
<br />II
<br />II
<br />I'
<br />,I
<br />:1
<br />"
<br />I:
<br />'I
<br />ii
<br />d
<br />il
<br />II
<br />II
<br />'I
<br />1/
<br />I'
<br />II
<br />,I
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />il
<br />il
<br />II
<br />I,
<br />
<br />Ii
<br />It
<br />I
<br />I'
<br />;1
<br />II
<br />'I
<br />I,
<br />[I
<br />I,
<br />~ I
<br />I,
<br />:1
<br />It
<br />'I
<br />I,
<br />
<br />Ii
<br />
<br />;1
<br />
<br />II
<br />
<br />'I
<br />il
<br />I,
<br />'I
<br />II
<br />;1
<br />I.
<br />II
<br />Il
<br />I:
<br />il
<br />,I
<br />It
<br />ii
<br />
<br />ii
<br />II
<br />:1
<br />I'
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />I'
<br />i:
<br />I
<br />:1
<br />"
<br />II
<br />!I
<br />I'
<br />il
<br />I'
<br />
<br />i
<br />I'
<br />,I
<br />Ii
<br />I,
<br />'I
<br />I:
<br />
<br />I:
<br />: ! .....
<br />
|