|
<br />299'~
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />__'/25/6q _
<br />
<br />- -- - ----- -- -
<br />....,...-- - - ---
<br />
<br /> 'I
<br /> ;
<br />I I
<br />!
<br />1
<br /> )
<br /> :1
<br /> ':1
<br /> r!
<br /> I
<br /> '."
<br /> :i
<br /> 'I
<br />2
<br />
<br />FOLLOWING THIS, SOME DISCUSSION WAS GIVEN ON THE METHODS WHICH MIGHT BE USED
<br />IN INTEGRATING THE OAKWAy-WILLAKENZIE AREA INTO THE EXISTING WARD BOUNDARIES,
<br />AND TO THIS END IT WAS STATED EX-OFfiCIO REPRESENTATIVES WOULD BE WELCOMED S~
<br />THE COUNCIL. SOME DISCUSSION WAS HAD AS TO WHETHER WARD BOUNDARIES SHOULD BE
<br />EXTENDED OR WHETHER THE COUNCIL SHOULD BE EXPANDED WITH THE INCLUSION Of THIS
<br />AND POTENTIAL OTHER AREAS TO THE CITY Of EUGENE. COUNCILWOMAN LAURI~ SUGGESTED
<br />THAT SINCE THE COUNCIL REPR~SENTS THE WHOLE CITY, ONE PERSON MIGHT BE ELECTED
<br />ON A WARD BASIS WITH fOUR PEOPLE BEING ELECTED ON AN AT-LARGE BASIS. THE CITY
<br />RECORDER ALSO REPORTED THAT THE OREGON STATE BOARD Of CENSUS HAS BEEN ASKED AS
<br />TO WHAT WOULD BE NECESSARY TO INCORPORATE THE POPULATION Of THE OAKWAY-WILLA-
<br />KENZIE AREA INTO THE CITY'S POPULATION fOR PURPOSES Of STATE SHARED REVENUES.
<br />No fORMAL ACTION WAS TAKEN.
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />il
<br />!I
<br />i'
<br />i
<br />I
<br />II
<br />I'
<br />I'
<br />II
<br />II
<br />,I
<br />I'
<br />II
<br />il
<br />II
<br />,I
<br />II
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />;1
<br />1,1
<br />~ I
<br />II
<br />
<br />'I ~
<br />
<br />TION TO THE WASHINGTON-JEffERSON OVERCROSSIN AND THE PROPOSED BRIDGE, THE PEARL
<br />TO HIGH ONE-WAY COUPLET AND THE WASHINGTON-JEffERSON ONE-WAY COUPLET, AND PRO-
<br />MISED THAT A REPORT ON THIS SUBJECT WOULD BE fORTHCOMING IN THE NEAR fUTURE.
<br />No fORMAL ACTION WAS TAKEN.
<br />
<br />..
<br />"
<br /><;
<br />1:1
<br />,
<br />
<br />,
<br />:'
<br />'I
<br />"
<br />
<br />00
<br />C\t
<br />~
<br />U
<br />CO
<br />CCl
<br />
<br />:1
<br />,
<br />
<br />12. ANNEXATION ELECTION IN THE WILLAKENZIE-OAKWAY AREA - SOME DISCUSSION WAS HAD
<br />ON THE RESULTS OF THE ANNEXATION ELECTION IN THE WILLAKENZIE-OAKWAY AREA AND
<br />IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT THE COUNCIL IS PLEASED WITH THE RESULT OF THE ELECTION.
<br />MR. CARL 'FISHER, WHO WAS IN ATTENDANCE AT THE MEETING AND fROM THE AREA, INDI-
<br />CATED THE REACTION IN THE WllLAKENZIE~OAKWAY AREA HAD BEEN QUITE GOOD. TOWARD
<br />THE END THAT CITY SERVICES CAN BE PROVIDED IN THE AREA COMPLETELY AND LEGALLY,
<br />THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT A SPECIAL MEETING Of THE COUNCIL BE HELD AT '
<br />5:00 PM ON MONDAY, JANUARY 18, 1960, TO CANVASS THE VOTES. MOTION CARRIED
<br />UNANIMOUSLY.
<br />
<br />i'
<br />
<br />\1
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />d
<br />~1
<br />"
<br />
<br />WITH REfERENCE TO PARKS, MAYOR CONE POINTED OUT THAT IT APPEARS THERE SHOULD
<br />BE AN INCREASE IN THE LEVY TO DO THIS JOB, AND THAT IT HAS BEEN SUGGESTED'
<br />THAT SUCH A LEVY BE THE EQUIVALENT OF 2 MILLS. LIKEWISE, A 5-MILL EQUIVALENT
<br />fOR STREETS HAS BEEN PROPOSED, AND THE MAYOR QUESTIONED THAT THE EXISTING
<br />2-1/2 MILL LEVY WOULD DO THE JOB WITH REFERENCE TO STREETS.
<br />
<br />i
<br />ji
<br />,I
<br />II
<br />:1
<br />'I
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />"
<br />
<br />II
<br />!,
<br />I'
<br />tl
<br />ii
<br />!/
<br />;1
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />il
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT ITEMS 10, II AND 12 Of THE COMMITTEE
<br />REPORT BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />if
<br />:;
<br />t!
<br />
<br />13. GAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS - MAYOR CONE INDICATED THAT THE COUNCIL SHOULD DETERMINE
<br />WHAT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS IT MIGHT PROPOSE fOR EITHER THE MAY 20 PRI-
<br />MARY ELECTION OR THE NOVEMBER GENERAL ELECTION. HE INDICATED THAT A ONE-MILL
<br />LEVY FOR PARKS WOULD EXPIRE WITH THE 1960-61 BUDGET AS WOULD THE 2-1r./2 MILL
<br />LEVY fOR CROSSTOWN STREETS. HE fURTHER STATED THAT THERE IS A GOOD POSSIBILITY
<br />THAT THE AIRPORT ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MAY BE A BALLOT MATTER AND THAT URBAN
<br />RENEWAL MAY ALSO BE A BALLOT MATTER, ALTHOUGH IT IS CONSIDERED TO BE AN ITEM
<br />WHICH CAN BE HANDLED BY THE REGULAR BUDGET. IT WAS fURTHER POINTED OUT THAT
<br />THE SUBJECT or A CITY HALL SHOULD ALSO APPEAR ON ONE OR THE OTHER Of THE BALLOTS.
<br />
<br />-~:
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br /> "
<br /> 'I
<br /> ,J
<br /> .!
<br /> \'i
<br /> "
<br /> 'I
<br /> ,
<br /> :\
<br /> "~I
<br /> ,
<br /> n
<br /> "
<br /> "
<br /> I
<br /> f'
<br /> I:
<br /> ,
<br /> "
<br /> "
<br /> I
<br /> ,i
<br /> ';;
<br /> Ii
<br /> ,
<br /> .I
<br /> \'
<br /> ,I
<br /> "
<br /> i
<br /> "
<br /> I'
<br /> 'I
<br />3 I
<br /> ~ I
<br /> .:
<br /> _I
<br />
<br />IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT THE CITY HALL ISSUE COULD NOT BE READILY EXPLAINED AT
<br />THIS TIME, THAT THERE ARE A NUMBER OF UNKNOWNS AND THAT PERHAPS THIS ITEM
<br />SHOULD BE ON THE NOVEMBER BALLOT. FOllOWING SOME GENERAL DISCUSSION ON THE
<br />SUBJECT AND THE NECESSITY OF SELLING THESE ITEMS TO THE PEOPLE, IT WAS GENERALLY
<br />CONCURRED THAT THE PARK ISSUE AND THE ARTERIAL ISSUE MIGHT BE SUBJECTS fOR THE
<br />MAY 20' PRIMARY ELECTION."
<br />
<br />I
<br />I,
<br />1\
<br />I'
<br />II
<br />1
<br />
<br />.f
<br />;;
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />,
<br />
<br />~ I
<br />
<br />I. REQUEST fOR AUTHORIZATION TO BE GIVEN PROPER CITY OfFICIALS TO SIGN AMENDMENT
<br />TO EX I ST I NG LEASES WI TH FEDERAL AVIAT'ION AGENCY AUTHCO!RI Z-ING AUTOMAT I C RENEWALS -
<br />IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT THE FAA NOW HAS THREE LEASES WITH THE CITY Of EUGENE AT
<br />MAHLON-SWEET AIRPORT, THESE BEING fOR ,ApPROACH 'LIGHT SYSTEM, RADIO INSTALLATION,
<br />AND SPACE IN 'THE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING. -SINCE THE FAA HAS AN OPTION TO RE-
<br />LEASE THESE -THREE fACILITIES, THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED-THAT AUTHORIZATION BE
<br />GIVEN PROPER CITY OffiCIALS TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT TO THE THREE MENTIONED LEASES
<br />PROVIDING 'fOR-AUTOMATIC RENEWAL.-' MOTION' CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
<br />
<br />I'
<br />11
<br />'I
<br />
<br />'I
<br />I
<br />II
<br />,I
<br />II
<br />il
<br />II
<br />
<br />\,
<br />II
<br />,I
<br />I'
<br />II
<br />II
<br />[I
<br />II
<br />il
<br />II
<br />II
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT ITEM 13 Of THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE
<br />APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />A REPORT. Of THE COMMI TTEE MEET I NG HELD JANUARY- 21,- 1960 WAS SUBM I TTED AND READ AS fOLLOWS:
<br />
<br />"PRESENT: MAYOR CONE; COUNCILMEN SHEARER, LAURIS, MOLHOLM, McGAfrEY, WILSON AND
<br />SWANSON; CITY MANAGER; ClTy,RECORDER; DIRECTOR Of PUBLIC WORKS;, CITY
<br />ATTORNEY; SUPERINTENDENT OF PARKS & RECREATION; FIRE MARSHAL; FIRE CHIEF;
<br />PLANNING CONSULTANT; TRAffiC ENGINEER; CHIEf Of POLICE; ADMINISTRATIVE
<br />'ASSISTANT; MR. MARLATT, CHAIRMAN GAS CODE COMMITTEE; Two REPRESENTATIVES
<br />Of NORTHWEST NATURAL GAS COMPANY; DAN WYANT AND DONN BONHAM, EUGENE REGISTER-
<br />'GUARD; JACK CRAIGi OREGON SPECTATOR;' SEVERA~ OTHER INTERESTED CITIZENS.
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />,
<br />
<br />4:.1
<br />1-1
<br />I
<br />h
<br />il
<br />"
<br />'I
<br />:i
<br />,
<br />"
<br />
<br />2. CONSIDERATION Of ENfORCEMENT OF SECTION 11.38 AND 11.39C1TY CODE PERTAINING
<br />DANGEROUS BUILDINGS LOCATED AT 407 EAST 32ND AVENUE, 481 EAST 32ND AVENUE AND
<br />2185 GRANT STREET - THE COMMITTEE VIEWED THESE STRUCTURES LOCATED AT THE ABOVE i
<br />
<br />1'...olIIIIll
<br />
|