|
<br />e
<br />
<br />1
<br />
<br />I '
<br />
<br />00
<br />N
<br />~n
<br />C.,)
<br />e::
<br />CC
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />2
<br />
<br />1 ,
<br />,
<br /> ;i
<br /> .,
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />3
<br />
<br />4
<br />
<br />1
<br />
<br />5
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />413~
<br />
<br />5/9/60.
<br />
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />i
<br />:' SOME DISCUSSION WAS HELD ON THIS fOLLOWING WHICH IT WAS MOVED BY MR. MCGAfFEY SECONDED BY MR. CHATT
<br />THAT THIS MATTER BE DEfERRED UNTIL AfTER THE FULL BUDGET COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED fOR MAY 18 AND
<br />19, 1960. MOTION CARRIED, MR. MOLHOLM VOTING NAY. .
<br />
<br />I'
<br />II
<br />.1
<br />
<br />11
<br />I,
<br />[I
<br />Ii
<br />il
<br />, ~
<br />
<br />,i
<br />
<br />3. PROPOSED NEW CITY HA~L IN CONNECTION WITH ARCHITECTS' COMPETITION - DEAN WALTER GORDON,
<br />THE PROFESSIONAL ADVISOR ENGAGED FOR THE ARCHITECTS' COMPETITION FOR THE CITY HALL, SPOKE
<br />TO THE COMMITTEE ON THE ARCHITECTS' COMPETITION. HE INDICATED THE PROGRAM IS DEVELOPING
<br />VERY WELL AND THAT /T SHOULD PROCEED, BUT THAT AT THE PRESENT TIME SOME ITEMS ARE UN-
<br />SETTLED. PRINCIPALLY AMONG THESE ITEMS IS THE AMOUNT AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION COSTS.
<br />HE INDICATED HE HAD DONE SOME RESEARCH ON COMPARABLE BUILDING COSTS WITHIN THE EUGENE
<br />AREA AND THAT THE EUGENE PUBLIC LIBRARY RECENTLY CONSTRUCTED COST $13.00 PER SQUARE FOOT.
<br />AT THE TIME THE LIBRARY BID WAS TAKEN THERE WAS A fAVORABLE BID CLIMATE AND THE AREAS
<br />OF THE LIBRARY WERE Of A LARGE EASILY BUILT NATURE.
<br />
<br />:'
<br />
<br />HE fURTHER INDICATED THAT THE COURTHOUSE COST $18.60 PER SQUARE FOOT, THAT THE UNIVERSITY
<br />Of OREGON CLASSROOM TYPE BUILDINGS RAN fROM $15.00 TO $17.00 PER SQUARE fOOT, AND THAT
<br />BASED ON THE AVERAGE COST Of THE COURTHOUSE AND THE LIBRARY AS A ROUGH COMPARATIVE
<br />fiGURE, THE AVERAGE WOULD BE $15.80 PER SQUARE FOOT.. RECOGNIZING THESE COSTS WERE Ef~
<br />fECTIVE AS Of TWO YEARS AGO. IN ADDITION TO THIS THE GENERAL CONCENSUS IS THAT THERE
<br />HAS BEEN A 7% INCREASE IN BUILDING COSTS IN THE LAST TWO YEARS WHICH WOULD NOW BRING
<br />THE COSTS Of BUILDING CONSTRUCTION ON THE AVERAGE TO $17.00 PER SQUARE fOOT. IT WAS
<br />FURTHER POINTED OUT THAT THE STATE OffiCE BUILDING WHICH HAS BEEN CONtEMPLATED fOR
<br />EUGENE WAS TO COST APPROXIMATELY $17.50 PER SQUARE FOOT.
<br />
<br />:1
<br />I'
<br />,I
<br />!i
<br />.1
<br />,:
<br />,.
<br />I:
<br />'i
<br />I,
<br />Ii
<br />~ I
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />I
<br />
<br />:1
<br />
<br />I,
<br />"
<br />,i
<br />II
<br />I[
<br />ii
<br />"
<br />II
<br />:i
<br />:1
<br />"
<br />Ii
<br />"
<br />
<br />:1
<br />
<br />i,
<br />I!
<br />,I
<br />"
<br />,i
<br />.1
<br />ii
<br />i ~
<br />Ii
<br />I'
<br />I'
<br />I
<br />:i
<br />
<br />:1
<br />11
<br />
<br />FOLLOWING SOME DISCUSSION IN WHICH IT WAS INDICATED IT WAS BELIEVED THE CITY HALL SHOULD
<br />BE A fUNCTIONAL BUILDING AND A fLEXIBLE BUILDING, THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THATTHEIR
<br />PREVIOUS ACTION BE AMENDED TO ALLOW fOR A MAXIMUM Of $17.00 PER SQUARE fOOT fOR CON-
<br />STRUCTION Of A CITY HALL, AND THAT THE ARCHITECTS SHOULD BE INSTRUCTED TO PRACTICE
<br />ECONOMY IN THE DESIGN SO THAT SUCH BUILDING COULD BE CONSTRUCTED AT A LESSER fiGURE IF
<br />AT ALL POSSIBLE. MOTION CARRIED, MR. WILSON VOTING NAY.
<br />
<br />DEAN WALTER GORDON THEN DESCRIBED THE PROCEDURAL METHODS IN THE COMPETITION AND INDI-
<br />CATED THAT THE COST or THE BUILDING SHOULD INCLUDE THE BUILDING COSTS, THE COMPETITION
<br />COST, THE LANDSCAPING COST, THE PARKING COST,. AND THAT A MODEST PUBL1CATION SHOULD.BE'
<br />MADE TO DESCRIBE THESE MATTERS TO THE ARCHITECTS WHO WILL ENGAGE IN THE COMPETITION.
<br />
<br />THE COMMITTEE THEN RECOMMENDED THAT THE COMPETITION BE OPEN ONLY TO REGISTERED RESI-
<br />DENT ARCHITECTS or THE STATE Of OREGON, AND' rOLlOWING SOME DISCUSSION THIS MO.TION
<br />CARR/ED UNANIMOUSLY.
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT 'TEM.30f THE COMMITTEE REPOR~ BE APPROVED.
<br />MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />4. RECONSIDERATION Of rlNAL OffER fOR EASEMENTS fOR WEST SIDE TRUNK SEWER - THE CITY ATTORNEY
<br />INDICATED THAT BASED ON PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION THE CITY IS CONTEMPLATING CONDEMNATION
<br />PROCEDURE ON fiVE PARCELS Of PROPERTY NEEDED fOR.THE EUGENE WEST SIDE TRUNK SEWER, AND
<br />THAT TO EffECTUATE SUCH CONDEMNATION AN OfrER MUST BE MADE TO THE OWNERS Of THE PROPERTY,
<br />BEING PROPERTIES OWNED BY GUTHRIE, LICHTY,GUMM, LOMBARD AND CHRISTOfERSON~ HE fURTHER
<br />INDICATED THAT APPRAISALS Of THE PROPERTIES HAD BEEN MADE BY TWO APPRAISERS AND THESE
<br />APPRAISALS HAD BEEN CONSIDERED BY.HIM AND THE CI~Y' ENGIN~ER, AND HE DESIRES TO OffER
<br />THE fiVE OWNERS Of THE PROPERTY A TOTAL Of $2,280 BASEeIONITAE.SCHEDULE PREPARED BY
<br />THE ENGINEERING STAff'. FOLLOWING SOME DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM, IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT
<br />THE RECOMMENDATION Of THE CITY ATTORNEy BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
<br />
<br />,i
<br />'I
<br />il
<br />I!
<br />"
<br />,.
<br />i:
<br />"
<br />I,
<br />"
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />I'
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />I:
<br />!I
<br />!,
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR.. SHEARER SECONDED. BY MR. CHATT THAT l;rEM.4 Of THE' COMMITTEE REP.ORTBE APPROVED.
<br />I MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />5. RECONSIDERATION Of REQUEST fOR CURB SIDEWALK ON THE NORTH SIDE or 22ND AVENUE fROM ADAMS
<br />TO FRIENDLY - MR. AND MRS. PHIL HARVEY APPEARED BErORE THE COMMITTEE, INDICATED THEY
<br />DES I RE CURB SIDEWALKS CONSTRUCTED ONTHE NORTH S I DE. Of 22ND AVENUE BETWEEN ADAMS AND
<br />FRIENDLY STREETS. THE HARVEYS IN THEIR, PRESENTATION INDICATED IT. WOULD BE .LESS EXPENSIVE
<br />TO THE PROPERTY OWNERS AND IT WOULD. INVOLVE LESS PROBLEMS IF' A CURB SIDEWALK WERE IN-
<br />STALLED THAN IF' A REGULATION SETBACK SIDEWALK WERE INSTALLED. CONVERSATION WAS HAD
<br />AMONG THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS AND MR. AND MRS. HARVEY ON THIS SUBJECT, AND IT WAS RECOM-
<br />MENDED THE ITEM 'BE HELD OVER .TO THE .REGULAR COUNC I l MEE1; I NG ON MONDAY, MAY 9, 1960..
<br />
<br />I...... .'r
<br />
<br />ACTION ON THIS ITEM .TAKEN' UNDER ITEM 8, COMMI.TTEE ME.ETING. or APRIL29,' '19.60.~ ,.
<br />f
<br />6. PAVING 25TH AVENUE FROM MONROE TO FRIENDLY- A PETITION CONTAINING SIGNATURES or OWNERS
<br />or 37.5% or THE PROPERTY TO BE ASSESSED .FOR.THE PAVING Of 25TH AVENUE FROM MONROE' TO
<br />FRIENDLY STREET WAS PRESENTED TO THE COMMITTEE. ONE OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS ONi THIS
<br />STREET APPEARED BErORE THE COMMITTEE TO REQUEST EARNEST CONSIDERATION or.THIS PETITION,
<br />AND fOLLOWI'NG SOME DI.SCUSSION IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT ~HE PETITION BE APPROVED AND
<br />THAT THE NECESSARY INITIATING ORDINANCES ~E PASSED. MOTIO~ CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
<br />
<br />, IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT ITEM 6 Of THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE APPROVED.
<br />.: MOT' I ON CARR I.EiD.
<br />
<br />7. PETITION OPPOSING PAVING or OLIVE STREET BETWEEN 26TH AND 27TH AVENUES - MR. CALLAHAN,
<br />A PROPERTY OWNER RESIDING IN THE AREA ON OLIVE STREET BETWEEN 26TH AND 27TH AVENUES,
<br />
<br />~
<br />
|