|
<br /> ~98,
<br /> e
<br /> 8/13/62
<br /> -:.__-:....--,-_..,.~=-=-~~....._____ _ _--..-::---:-....::':_::=~~~-;:';""'_"'::'~c::-.F>'-,,_~~;;..'!n~-"~_:--.~.;-.~;...__"'''- _-~~~~=-:,..~-:--~::.:_~~~-='".-._.....-:-=--..;_;...-._-~- ...--....... _ "" .-.----""~ -..,... ----"----- ------~-~--_..,
<br /> ...". -- ._....~--.=""'"'"-=__"'=":_Y:.~:;;._.. - ---,'" ._.'_-.-~' '""'-" ....~'
<br /> '"----_.~ "- ""'.-=...,..=- '_~.__'" '. _-"-.C:'''''''''' .........._...:<..'<.-"<-_._ __L."-"""-"'_ L..:..,- --- .'_..A-.:o..._....:.....:...- . __ ...;"J_ .~--....._; '-- -..-....- - """-=' "......--....... "- -. "-' ,...... ...... -.,.-~ .---.."'--" -- -. ,"""" :',.. ,.. ...~ - c__' -"1:-'.-_-0<. -=- -_. .-
<br /> WIDTH TO THE RIGHT TURN LANE FROM 13TH TO HILYARD. MR. MOYER MOVED SECONDED BY MR. CHATT I
<br /> TO APPROVE THE RECOMMENDATION. MOTION CARRIED.
<br /> I 8. CURB SIDEWALK, ADAMS BETWEEN 23RD AND 24TH (CUL-DE-SAC ) - PETITIONED BY PROPERTY OWNERS
<br /> IN THE AREA,"THE PUBLI~'WORKS DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDED CURB SIDEWALK LOCATION ON THE
<br /> CIR~ULAR PORTION OF T~E CUL-DE-SAC ONLY WITH SIDEWALK AT STANDARD SETBACK LOCATION ON
<br /> THE STEM. -MR. CHATT MOVED SECONDED BY MR. 'MOLHOLM TO APPROVE THE RECOMMENDATION. MOTIO~
<br /> CARRIED.
<br /> 2 9. CURB SlOEWALK, MONROE'~ETWEEN 25TH AND 26TH - PETITIONED BY PROPERTY OWNER~ I N THE AREA"
<br /> ON THE BASIS OF CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE REQUIRED SETBACK AREA PRIOR TO-ANNEXATION TO THE
<br /> CITY AND BECAUSE OF EXISTING. TREES AND SHRUBS IN THE STANDARD SETBACK AREA. MR. CHATT
<br /> MO~ED SECONDED ~Y MR. MOLHOLM TO APPROVE LOCATION OF SIDEWALK AT THE CURB AS REQUESTED.
<br /> MOTION CARRIED, MR. SWANSON VOTING NO.
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MRS. LAURIS SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT ITEMS 7, 8 AND 9, OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE
<br /> APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED, MR. SWANSON VOTING NO. e
<br /> 3 10. ABATEMENT 2480 HILyARD STREET, ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH - THE SUPER.lNTENDENT OF t~UJLDING
<br /> INS~ECTION REPORTtD AN ADD1TION TO A BU1LDINGON THIS PRbPERTY HAD BEEN C6VERE6 THROUGH
<br /> ISSUANCE OF A BUILDINQ PERMIT IN SEPTEMBER 1957 BUT HAD NEVER BEEN COMPLETED. MR. SWANSON
<br /> MOVED SECONDED BY MA. .CHATT TO PROCEED WITH ABATEMENTr MOTION CARRIED.
<br /> 4 I I. ABATEMENT 2540 HILYARD STRtET, VIRGINIA D. HACKETT - A"REPORT FROM'THE SUPERINTENDENT OF I
<br /> BUILDING INSPECTIONSTATED THE OWNERS HAD"BEEN ~ONTACTED ON APRIL 18, 196~ AND NOTIFI ED
<br /> TO .~INISH CONSTAUCTI9~ OF A BLOCK BUILDING ON THE PROPERTY WITHIN 30 DAYS. No WORK HAS I}
<br /> BEEN COMMENCED, AND IT WAS RECOMMENDED ABATEMENT PROCEEDINGS BE INSTITUTED AND THE I
<br /> BUILDINGS RAZED. MR..SWANSON'MOVED SECONDED BY~R. CHATT TO PROCEED WITH ABATEMENT.
<br /> MOTiON CARRIED. I
<br /> 5 12. ABATEMENT 2510 HILYARD STREET, HAROLD LEONARD - THE SUPERINTEND~NT OF BUILDING INSPECTION I
<br /> REPORTED THE OWNER OF'THE PROPERTY HAD BEEN CONTACTED' SEVERAL T1MES OVER THE PAST F IFl:E;EN
<br /> YEARS TO REMOVE JUNK "AND 'YOU NAME IT FROM A SHEO IN FRONT O~ THE ~PARTMENT HOUSE ON THE
<br /> PROPERTY AT 2510 HILYARD STREET. . IT IS THE SUPE-RiNTENDENT,'SRECOMMENDATION THAT ABATEMENT
<br /> PROCEEDINGS BE INSTITUTED. MR. SWANSON MOVED SECONDED BY MR. CHATT TO APPROVE THE ABATE-
<br /> MENT. MOTION CARRIED. I
<br /> PAVING ALLEY BETWEE~ MILL AND FERRY FROM 3RD AVENUE TO ALLE~ BETWEEN 3RD AND 4TH AVENUES -
<br /> 6 13. I
<br /> A PET I T ION AND LETTERSI GNED BY MRS'. LYRIS WITZIG, REP"RESENTING50"% OF THE PROPERTY
<br /> ABUTTING THIS ALLEY, WERE PRESENTED FOR PA~ING THE ALLEY. MRS. WITZIG WROT~ SHE WOULD
<br /> BE WILLING TO ASSUME THE TOTAL COST OF THE PAVING IF THE CITY DOES NOT FEEL IT CAN SPEND
<br /> THE MONE'Y AT TH 1ST I"ME FOR ITS PROPORTIONATE SHARE, WITH THE UNDERSTAND I NG THA T )~NY MONE.Y
<br /> I SHE MIGHT PAY FOR THE C!TY WOULD BE DE'DUCTED FROM LEASEHOLD -EXPENSES SHE IS REQU I RE,D: TO
<br /> PA Y THE C rTY ON CITY OWNED PROPERTY :ABUTTI NG THE: ALLEY." MR. WIL~dN MOVED SECONDE~ BY
<br /> I MR. MOYER TO PROCEED AND PAVE THE ALLEY AND MAKE ARRANGEMENTS "FOR THE PAYMENTS WITWTHE
<br /> OWNER OF ABUTTING PROPERTY." MOTION CA:RRIED.--' "
<br /> II .
<br /> MRS. LAURIS MOVED 'SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT' ITEMS' 10, I I ," I '2 AND 13 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORi BE AP- I
<br /> 'I PROVED. MOTION CARRIED. '.
<br /> 7 14. STREET WIDENING CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT - A REPORT WAS SUBMITTED BY THE DIRECTOR OF I
<br /> PUBL I C WORKS SETT I NG -FORTH PROPOSALS AS TO THE WI DEN I NG Of' MA'NY O-F THE STREETS IN :THE .
<br /> DOWNTOWN CORE AREA AND ASK INGTHAT STANDARDS BE SET FOR "STREETWI:DTHS.~ SINCE THIS IS,
<br /> A VERY LENGTHY REPORT AND THE COUNCIL HAD NOT HAD TIME -TO STUDY IT, IT WAS":SUGGESTED
<br /> THAT COPIEi B~ M~6E AND SUBMITTE6 TO THE COUNCIL A~D TO:THE PLA~NIN~ COMMISSION. MR.CHATT
<br /> MOVED SECONDED BY MR. SWANSON TO REFER THE 'REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMIS~ION WITH PARTICULAR
<br /> , . IN- THE" CURRENT SEASON. . MOTION CARRIED. e
<br /> EMPHASIS ON THE PROPOSAL FOR WORK TO BE DONE
<br /> . " -#.' .. -0. I
<br /> MRS. LAUR I S MOVE 0 SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOlM T6 APPRO~~:THE COMMITTEE REPORT WITH REFERENCE TO THE REPORT
<br /> OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ON THE STREET PROPOSALS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION. MOTION CARRIED.
<br /> THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT REPORTED THAT THE CURBS AND GUTTERS ON THOSE STREETS WHICH WERE NOT IN-
<br /> .
<br /> TENDED TO BE WIDENED WOULD BE' REPAI'RED OR REPLACED THIS SUMMER AS NEEDED.
<br /> COUNCILMAN MOYER ARRIVED AT THE MEETING AT THIS'POINT. I
<br /> . '
<br /> 8 15. AIRPORT COMMISSION REPORT, 'JULY 27, 1962 - AT THE -REQUEST- OF THE CITY COUNCIL, THE AIR-
<br /> PORT COMM I SS I ON" MADE A' REPORT REGARD I NG THE BALLOT -MEASURE" CONC"ERN I NG AI RPORT IMPROVE-
<br /> MENTS TO BE VOTED-UPON IN TH'E NOVEMBER'6,1962 ELEC'TION.: THE COUNCIL HAD REQUESTED A
<br /> -"
<br /> RECOMMENDATION AS TO WHETHER THERE SHOULD BE 'TWO MEASURES-ON THE BALLOT~ OR"~UST ONE
<br /> MEASURE COVERING 'THE ENTIRE PROGRAM FOR THE AIRPORT. j I
<br /> THE AI~PORT COMMISSIO~ UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDED ,THAT ONE MEASURE BE PLACED ON THE
<br /> NOVEMBER BALLOT TO INCLUDE FINANCING, SITE DEVELOPMENT, TERMINAL aUILblNG AND LAND
<br /> ACQUISITION, AS IT WAS FELT EACH PHASE OF THE AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM SUPPLEMENTED.
<br /> THE OTHERS, AND THAT SHOULD THE ENTIRE MEASURE BE UNSUCCESSFUL, THE LAND ACQUISITION
<br /> PROGRAM COULD BE SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS AT A SUBSEQUENT ELECTiON. IT HAD BEEN POINT~D.
<br /> OUT THAT THE'CITY MAY'BE REQUIRED TO MEET CERTAIN FIRE PROTECTION STANDARDS OF THE
<br /> e
<br /> ~i !
<br /> '- ~
<br />
|