|
<br />r368
<br />e
<br />
<br />8/12/63
<br />
<br />-.-7,,, __. .~~ ........,--.".- _..,....- .._~'.. "'''-'_,'<:--=0 -,.-'" .......,,__.~......_-'-.~_--,.-~ -,. -~__
<br />
<br />- -.".._.~ ~- - "'- ... --. -. --..- ----.-- ..,~. "-"'- "'-' --<- - -. .' - _. -_-"" -...
<br />
<br />,"f
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />
<br />I 7. PURCHASE OF MED I.LL ,PROPERTY, SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT- THE DI RECTOR' OF
<br />PUBL:I C WORKSRECO~MENDED THAT APPROX IMATEL Y 4.43 ACR'ES BE PURCHASED FROM
<br />MRS. MEDILL AS AD.DITI.ONAL AREA NEEDED NEAR THE SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT. IT
<br />WAS S'TATED THAT TH'E'A'PPRAISED PRICE OF THE' PROPERTY WAS $2'1,500, WHICH
<br />PRICE WAS LOWER THAN THE ASK.ING PRI~E. MR. CHATT'MoVEti SECONbED BY,MR.DEVERELL
<br />THAT- THE C I T'Y' MA,NAG"ER NE~O! I ATE THE PURCHASE :OF THE "PROPERTY ON TH( BAS I SOF
<br />$21,50.0. MOTION CARRIED,'.
<br />
<br />MR. CHATT'MOVED SECONDED BY MR., SWANSON THAT ITEM 7 OF THE COMMITTEE .REPORT BE APPROVED.
<br />ROLLCALL VOTE. A~L COU~CILMEN PRESENT VOTING AYE,'MOTI~ CARRIED.
<br />. . ~ -
<br />
<br />2 8. WOOD SCREEN, NEW CITY HALL - MR. JIM LONGWOOD, ARCHITECT, EXPLAINED THEY HAD
<br />LEARNED, THE FIRE RES.ISTANT TREA'TMENTCOUL.D:,NOT :BEUSED ON"THE'CEDAR WOOD" _
<br />SCREENING TO BE USED .ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE NEW CITY, HALL AND ON ~ART OF THE ~
<br />COU,NC'I L CHAMBER. HE ,SUGGESTED THAT PERHAPS A LA'M I NATED MATE'R I AL WOULD HAVE
<br />TO BE U,SED, :BUT EXP.LA I.NED SEVERAL, POI NTS ABO,UT THE USE' OF THAT TYPE OF WOOD.
<br />COUNC,I LMAN CHR I STENS't'N SUGGESTED THE ,US'E OF ALUM I NUM' BEAMS WHI CH RA I SED CON-.
<br />SIDERABLY DISCUSSION. 'SINCE NE-ITHER 'HiE 'ARCHITECTS NOR THECON"TRACTOR' HAD 1
<br />CONTEMPLATED :SUBST I-TUT I ON OF A METAL, THERE WERE NO COSTS AV'A I LABLE ON. THE'
<br />U'SE OF ALUMINUM' BEAMS. REALI"ZING "THAT T'IME IS 'of niEEssENCE TO THE CON- 1
<br />TRACTOR, WHO WAS PRESENT AND A'LSOENTER{D' I NTO THE DISCUSS ION; l'r WAS
<br />FINALLY SUGGESTED THA~.7HE ARCHITECTS OR THE CONTRACTOR COULD OBTAIN P~ICES
<br />ON THE USE 'OF ALUMINUM 'BEAMS BY MONDAY, AUGUST 5", AT WHICH TIME THEY WOULD ,_.
<br />BE PRESENTED TO THE COUNCIL. IT WAS ALSO SUGGESTED THAT PERHAPS AN INTER-
<br />PRETATION OF THE CODE COULD BE OBTAINED BY THE ARCHITECTS CONCERNING THE FIRE
<br />I,NSLRANCE RATINGS ON ALUMI,NUM VERS'US WOOD'." .. -
<br />. , ' I
<br />MR. C_H-:TT MOVED, SECONDEp BY MR. SWAiIIsON THAT li'EM 8 OF THE COMMITTEE 'REPORT BE APPROVED. I
<br />MOTION CARRI~~~ I
<br />
<br />
<br />COMMITTEE MEE'Ti'NG HELD AUGUST 5, '196'3:.
<br />
<br />"PRESENT: MAYOR CONE; COUNCILMEN LAURIS, SWANSON, CHRISTENSEN, DEVERELL, CRAKES,
<br />AND PURDY; 'CITY MANAGER; CtTV"~!;~TTORNEY; CITY RECORDER; ,ADMINISTRATIVE I ..
<br />Ass I ~TANT ; DIRECTOR OFPARKSA~? RECREAT ION; FRED CUTHBERT, CHA I RMAN, I
<br />AND OTHER MEMBERS OF THE STREE;,Ti,:,!REE COMM I TTEE. - "
<br />
<br />3 I. STREET TREE -COMt-1I.TTEE'REPORT,- DR: COl:HBERT GAVE. A BRIEF OUTLINE OF THE WORK 'I
<br />WHICH HAD'BEEN DONE BY THE STREET TREE COMMITTEE, THE EXTENT OF THE SURVEY
<br />WHICH I:tAD I?EEN MADE, AND THE RECO,MMENDATIONS OF THE COMMIT"fEE WHICH WERE IN-
<br />CLUDED'IN A REPORT Sl!BM'ITTED'TO THE COUNCIL,...HE SHOWED'PICTURE--SLIDES OF
<br />,T.. .,..,...,:. ' ,
<br />~OCATI,ONS HE HAD VISITED W~'CH ILLUST~ATED DIFFERENT TYPE~ OF TREES, VARIOUS
<br />NEIGHBORHOO,DS, AND WHAT COULD'BE 'ACCOMPL!SHED BY A PL~NNED.P'ROGRAM OF STREET 1
<br />TREE P(iNil~G;T~E ST~EEf TREE COM~j~TEt'RECOMM~NDED'THAT THE CITY OF EUGENE
<br />UND~RtA~E ~ STREET TREE~RbGRAM WHicH'WO~LD INCLUDE REPLACING DISEASED TREES,
<br />~LIMIN~!ING HAZARDOUS TREES,~MAINTA~NING ~HE PRESENT TREES ~LONG STREETS, I .
<br />AND PLANTING TREES IN THOSE AREAS WHICH WOULD LEND THEMSELVES ~O THE PROGRAM.
<br />THE DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION GAVE AN~ESTIMATE OF THE COST OF SUCH
<br />A PROGRAM AND PROBAB~E LENGTH OF TIME TO COMPLE~~~ 1
<br />
<br />MRS..LAi.iR~S.,'MOVED T,HAlHiil1HE CI'TY AtTORNEY DRAW AN"ORDINANCE ESU.'BLI'SHING A ,'a
<br />STREET TREE PROGRAM FOR THE City OF EUGENE. 'THE MOT fON' WAS NOT SECONDED. I'"
<br />IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT THERE WAS NO MONEY BUDGETED IN THE CURRENT BUDGET .
<br />'TOR'THE PROGRAM AND THAT 'IT-'WOULD TAKE SOME TIME TO MAKE A SURV~YOF THE
<br />NUMBER;, TYPE, AND CONDITION OF'1'REES--IN THE C'TV, 'BI}T THAT'TH'S,'COULD' BE
<br />DONE IN TIME TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION 'TO THE BUDGET'COMMITTE~ FOR THE 1964-65
<br />BUDGET.
<br />
<br />MR. 'SWANSON, MOVED SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT' A TREE INVENTORY BE MADE,AND
<br />I RECOMMENDATIONS'PREPARED FOR A STREET TREE PROGRAM'TO BE PRESENTED TO THE I
<br />BUDGET COMMITTEE. MOTION CARRIED."
<br />
<br />MR. CHATT MOVED SECONDED BY MR. SWANSON THAT ITEM I OF THE COMMITTEE 'REPORT BE APPROVED. I
<br />MOTION CARRIED. I
<br />
<br />- I
<br />
<br />COMMITTEE MEETING' HELD AUGUST 8, 1963: .1-
<br />
<br />"PRESENT~ M~~o~ CONE; COUN~IL~tN CHATT, LAU~IS, SWANSON, CHRISTENSENi DEVERELL, "
<br />CRAKES~ AND PURDY; CITY MANAGER; CITY ATTORNEY; 'C'!TY RECORDER; -
<br />ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER; CITY ENGINEER; AND OTHERS.
<br />
<br />8/12/63 -9
<br />
<br />
<br />i e
<br />~ l
<br />
|