|
<br />~,;
<br />32()'
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />5/22/67
<br />
<br />-.
<br />
<br />1
<br />
<br />10. Paving, Sanitary and Storm Sewers, Shasta Gardens 1st Addition - Petitioned by owners
<br />of 100% of property to be assessed. Estimated. storm sewer cost to be borne by the
<br />City is $700. Mr. McNutt moved seconded by Mr. Anderson to approve the petition.
<br />Motion carried.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />Dr. Purdy moved seconded by Mr. Anderson to approve Items 6 through ~O of the Committee report.
<br />Motion carried.
<br />
<br />With regard to the Parmelee Court project, Ray Parmelee quest,ioned assessing the cost of storm sewers
<br />to the property owner, and was told that in new subdivisions it has been the policy that the developer
<br />assumes the cost of storm sewer ,construction.
<br />
<br />2
<br />
<br />11. Paving, Sanitary and Storm Sewers, Parmelee Court - Petitioned by Wallace Parmelee,
<br />owner of 56% of affected properties. The Public Works Department recommended that,
<br />since partLof the right-of-way is not dedicated, only that portion which is dedicated
<br />be improved if Mr. Parmelee is willing to pay the entire cost ~nd be reimbursed if
<br />and when the adjacent property is developed and assumes its share of the cost.
<br />Dr. Purdy moved seconded py Mr. McNutt to approve the petition. Motion carried.
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />3
<br />
<br />12. Paving Olive, 24.th to 24th' Place - Pet itioned by Owners of 55% of abutting property.
<br />The Public Works Department reported a retaining wall may be required on the east side
<br />of the street and recommended cost of its construction be included in the paving assess-
<br />ment. Mr. Lassen moved secondeq by Mrs. Hayward to approve the petition, subject to
<br />working out an agreement with the petitioner for payment of retaining wall cost.
<br />Motion carried.
<br />
<br />4
<br />
<br />13. Curb Sidewalk, Lamplite Lane - Todd Jensen requested reconsideration of the Council's
<br />decision to require ,standard setback sidewalks on Lamplite Lane. He said curb side-
<br />walks would conform with the location of those on Welcome Way, an adjacent street,
<br />would give more area in the frorJ.t yards, and would prqvide a through walkway for '
<br />pedestrians .an4 easier access to and from automobiles parked at the curb. The Public
<br />Works Di~ector cited the many reasons for retaining the parking strip. Mr. McNutt
<br />moved seconded by Dr. Purdy to deny ~econsiqeration. Motion car~ied.
<br />
<br />,I
<br />
<br />Dr. Purdy moved seconded by Mr. Anderson to approve Items 11 through 13 of the Committee report.
<br />Motion carried.
<br />
<br />5
<br />
<br />14. Anti-Noise Enforcement - The City Manager read a letter from Martin Shedd, 1506 Lorane
<br />Highway, with regard to enforcement of regulations governing noisy motorcycles, logging
<br />trucks, .automobiles with "defective" muf:E:lers, etc. A report from the Municipal Court
<br />indicated 2,035 citations were:issued for qoise violations between July 1, 1965 and
<br />June 30, 1966, and 740 were issued during the first four months of 1967.
<br />
<br />Councilman McDonald inquired about regulations governing excessive noise created by operation of
<br />Hondas and by amplifiers. He reported several residents along West 21st Avenue had called him con-
<br />cerning noise caused by Hondas on that street.
<br />
<br />6
<br />
<br />15. Oregon Electric Tracks, 5th Avenue - .The City Manager said consideration of removal of
<br />the Oregon Electric tracks from 5th Avenue has been scheduled for the Committee meet-
<br />ing on May 25, 1967.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />7
<br />
<br />16. Central Business ,District ~ A letter was noted from Robert A. Stot~ers, 979 Ferry Street,
<br />setting forth his ideas and suggestions with regard to redevelopment of the downtovn
<br />area and construction of a parking ~tructure.
<br />
<br />8
<br />
<br />17. Announcements
<br />a. National League of Cities annual conference in Boston, July 29-August 2, 1967.
<br />b. County Commissioners hearing on Kendall Ford rezoning, May 17, 1967 - 10:00 a.m.
<br />It was agreed that Councilmen Anderson and McDonald would represent the City
<br />Council at the hearing.
<br />c. Continuation of hearing on new zoning ordinanc~ before City Planning Commission
<br />on Monday, May 15, 1967- 7:30 p.m."
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />Dr. Purdy moved seconded by Mr. Anderson that Items 14 through 17, of the Committee report be received
<br />and filed. Motion carried.
<br />
<br />Committee meeting held May 18,1967:
<br />
<br />"Present: Mayor Cone; Gouncilmen Purdy,McNutt, Anderson, Lassen, Hayward, McDonald, and
<br />Wingard; City Manager and staff; and others.
<br />
<br />9
<br />
<br />1. Sewe~ Lo~ation, BD-67-l7" Martinson - Copi~s,of answers to the object~ons of M. L.
<br />Martinson to locat ion of: the sewer on Stewart Road were distribute4 to Council membe,rs.
<br />Attorney Liepe introduced;,Mrs. Martinson, co-owner of the pi'operty, and her mother, ,
<br />Mrs. Hen:lerson. It was: agreed the item would be held for discussion- at the May 22,
<br />1967, Council meeting._
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />Dr. Purdy moved seconded by Mr. Anderson to loc'ate the sewer as originally bid and award the c~:Jntract
<br />to McKenzie Road & Drivew~y Company on tqeir low bip of $76,440.69.
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />l
<br />
<br />5/22/67 - 9
<br />
|