Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 4 ~ <br /> '6~1 <br /> e <br /> 9/25/67 <br /> I 1 1. Sign Ordinance - Mrs. Hayward inquired concerning progress on development of a new <br /> sign ordinance. It was explained that work is being done on the ordinance by the <br /> Planning Commission and that it will be presented to the Council when completed. <br /> Mrs. Lauris moved seconded by Mrs. Hayward that Item 1 of the Committee report be received and placed <br /> oil'file. Motion carried. <br /> 2 2. Architects . 10th and Oak Parking Strucnure - Mr. Anderson described steps taken by <br /> the committee in making their selection and recommended retaining N. G. Jacobson <br /> and Associates, Inc. , consulting engineers of Seattle, to design the 10th and Oak <br /> parking structure. It was explained that considerable time could be saved if the <br /> schematic design could be done now rather than waiting until the pending court case <br /> had been decided. Cost for this phase of the planning will be $9600. Mr. Anderson <br /> moved seconded by Mrs. Lauris to retain N. G. Jacobson and Associates, Inc. , as <br /> architects for the 10th and Oak parking strucnure. Motion carried. <br /> e Mr. McDonald inquired if the City would be obligated if the case was decided against <br /> the City. It was explained that no City money would be spent until the case is de- <br /> cided. It was also explained that Jacobson would associate with a local architect <br /> in formulating his design. <br /> Mrs. Lauris said that it had been brought to the attention of the Council that the Renewal Agency <br /> would prefer that no further action be taken with regard to the 10th and Oak parking structure until <br /> I it could be determined whether this location would fit in with the plans being made by Rogers, Talia- <br /> ferro, Kostritsky, Lamb. Mr. Anderson commented that it would be possible to designate the firm and <br /> postpone work on the plans until the report is received, that it is important to maintain interest <br /> in the program, and that the project does involve a $2 million credit in the urban renewal program. <br /> Mr. McNutt commented that so much has been done, including assessments, etc. , that to choose a new <br /> location now would be very complicated. The City Manager commented that getting the schematic design <br /> now would save about 60 days and make it possible for the structure to be used for Christmas shopping <br /> crowds in 1968. He said private money is available for this design, with this money being repaid if <br /> it is decided to go ahead with the building at its present location. If not, the money would not <br /> have to be repaid. <br /> Mrs. Lauris moved seconded by Mrs. Hayward to approve Item 2 of the committee report. Motion carried, <br /> Mr. McDonald voting no. <br /> 3 3. Transient Room Tax - Mayor Cone asked what had been done in regard to investigating <br /> the possibility of a room occupancy tax to be levied by the City. The receipts from <br /> such a, tax would, be earmaI;~~d for civ~c improvement proj ects such as an auditorium <br /> The City Attorney reported that under the Home Rule provisions of Oregon law the City <br /> could levy such a tax by amending the Charter. <br /> 4 4. Alton Baker Park - General discussmon was held regarding the development of Alton <br /> Baker Park. Mayor Cone suggested that considerable work could be accomplished now <br /> with the use of free labor, etc. The Director of Parks and Recreation explained <br /> I that very little could be done until a comprehensive plan for land use in the Park <br /> is finished. Mrs. Lauris suggested planting trees along Centennial Boulevard as <br /> one thing that could be done now. Mayor Cone suggested development of an arboretum. <br /> The City Manager commented that a number of questions must be settled before much <br /> work can be done; among others, the question of who ii to be responsible for <br /> maintenance. Mrs. Lauris suggested setting up a committee composed of representa- <br /> tives from the entire area to develop plans for the park. The possibility that <br /> e Federal funds could be obtained was also mentioned. Mr. Anderson commented that <br /> progress is being made, that getting the name had been one step, and that possibly <br /> the private sector of the community can be interested in helping with finances. <br /> Mrs. Lauris moved seconded by Mrs. Hayward that Items 3 and 4 of the Committee report be received <br /> and filed. Motion carried. <br /> 5 5. Metropolitan Water and Sewer Study - Larry Rice, director of Central Lane Planning <br /> Council, presented a planning program for a metropolitan water and sewer study which <br /> had been previously requested by CLPC. He explained that the purpose of the program <br /> is to provide a guiding document to be used by local governmental agencies to assure <br /> that each community's sewer and water programs will be an integral part of the total <br /> area system, and to provide data that will enable local governments to continue to <br /> meet Federal planning requirements for sewer and water grants and loans. It was <br /> further explained that total cost of the planning program will be approximately <br /> $140,000, two-thirds of which would be Federal funds of which Eugene's share will <br /> I be $15,260 ($10,860 case and $4400 in staff services). Cash contributions also would <br /> be made by Lane County and the city of Springfield, and service contributions would <br /> be made by Springfield, Lane County, EWEB, Springfield Utility Board, and Pacific <br /> Power and Light. Mrs. Lauris moved seconded by Mr. Arrla-son to approve part icipat ion <br /> in the study. Motion carried. <br /> 6 6. Transportation Study - Larry Rice, director of Central Lane Planning Council, explained <br /> that money is now needed to complete the reports on the Eugene-Springfield Area Trans- <br /> e portation Study, and that the City's share of these costs, based on a per~entage of the <br /> 'I 9/25/67 - 12 t.4 <br /> II <br />