Laserfiche WebLink
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
<br />106 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />3/11/68 <br /> <br />The City Manager said variations in purchase price generally are a result of severance <br />damage determined by proximity of the right-of-way to residences. Some discussion <br />took place with regard to replacement of trees necessarily removed, and the Public <br />Works D~rector explained the present policy of paying damages for tree removal. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Anderson moved seconded by Mr. Lassen to purchase right-of-way as recommended. Rollcall vote. <br />All councilmen present voting aye, motion carried. <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />5. Right-of-way, 18th, Brabham - Mr. James A. Brabham requested a substandard sidewalk <br />from Oak Patch Road along his property line on 18th Avenue. The Public Works Depa~t- <br />ment recommended denial, and. reported concerning negotiations for acquisition of <br />right-of-way from Mr. Brabham at Oak Patch Road for widening 18th Avenue. Mr.Brabham <br />was offered $3,910.00 based upon a slope fill from the sidewalk to his home which was <br />rejected-. This amount included $2,000.00 as severance damages for proximity of the <br />right-of-way to Mr. Brabham's home. He asked for construction of a retaining-wall <br />instead. . The Public Works Department estimated th~ cost of the retaining wall at <br />$3,103.00,. and reduction in severance damages of about $1,000.00 if the retaining <br />wall is constructed.. The Department recommended offering Mr.Brabham construction of <br />the wall at the City's expense plus $2.,910.00 for the right-of-way. Councilman Lassen <br />asked if it would be better to straighten the alignment rather than moving the street <br />to the north, and the Public Works Director answered that the damages would be much . <br />greater because of resulting inaccessibility to so~e of the properties. He said also <br />it would not be possible to construct a sidewalk on each side of the street. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />, <br />:1 <br />:1 <br />!i <br />II <br />I, <br />Ii <br />II <br /> <br />" <br /> <br /> <br />ii <br />2 il <br />II <br />II <br />,I <br />!I <br />" <br />" <br />II <br />I' <br />Ii <br />Ii <br />3 !I <br />II <br />Ii <br />Ii <br />r <br />,I <br />1\ <br />Ii <br />ii No action was taken. <br /> <br />4 :! <br />II <br />:i <br />,I <br />II <br />'I <br />II <br />II <br />r <br />II <br />il <br />Ii <br />5 !I <br />I, <br />" <br />Ii <br />'I <br />:1 <br />Ii <br />" <br />II Mr. Anderson moved seconded <br />il number only, with unanimous <br />;~__the second time' by counci 1 <br /> <br />:1 <br /> <br />" <br />Ii <br />" <br />II <br />il <br /> <br />II <br />Ii <br />1\ <br />:1 <br />II <br />I <br />:1 <br />II <br />I, <br />:i <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />~! <br /> <br />Mr. Anderson moved seconded by Mr. Lassen to proceed with negotiations with Mr. Brabham-as recommended. <br />Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, motion carried. <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />6. Sale of City Property, 2nd and Fillmore - Stringfield Bros. Lumber Co. inquired <br />whether the City would sell a 22'x178.5' strip of land in 'its ownership running <br />south from 2nd Avenue west of Fillmore. The property lies adjacent to land in <br />Stringfield's ownership. The City Manager recommended that the property be put <br />the market on a bid basis with a $2,000.00 minimum price. <br /> <br />on <br /> <br />Mr.Anderson moved seconded by Mr. Lassen to call for bids with a m~n~mum price of $2,000.00 and to : <br />limit the bidding to owners of adjacen~ properties. Motion carried on rollcall vote with ?ll council- Il! <br />men present voting aye. <br /> <br />I' <br />I <br />, <br /> <br />7. Traffic Report, 8th and Madison - A report from the Traffic Engineer w?s presented <br />with regard to parking prohibition authorized by the Council in February 1967 with <br />a restudy of the intersection to be made after a year. The_ report recommended no <br />change at the intersection nor installation of additional traffic control. <br /> <br />.. <br />'=' <br /> <br />8. Assessment Segregation, Fox Hollow Road and Donald Street, Kreklau (S-68C) - Lloyd J. <br />Kreklau requested segregation of asses?ment against his property at this location in <br />the amount of $2,220.46, leaving a balance of $2,173.02. The amount to be segregated <br />plus interest has been paid, and the Finance Depa!tment recommended approval of the <br />segregation. <br /> <br />Mr. Anderson moved seconded by Mr. -Lassen to approve the segregation. <br /> <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />I, <br /> <br />ORDINANCES <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />Council Bill No. 8254 - Levying assessments for sanitary sewer in BD-66-l0 (bounded by line 160 <br />feet north of and parallel to Royal Avenue, Archie Street, Southern Pacific Coos Bay branch right-of- <br />way, and line 800 feet west of andparallel to Ruskin Street), submitted and read the first time in <br />full on January 22, 1968 and held over to this date to allow proper notice of assessment tobe given <br />owners of affected properties, were brought back with written protests onfile (see committee report <br />March 7, 1968). <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />by Mr. Lassen that the bill be read the <br />consent of the Council. Motion carried <br />bill number only. <br /> <br />second time by council bill <br />unanimously and the bill was read <br /> <br />Mr.Anderson moved seconded by Mr. Lassen that the bill be read the third time by council bill number <br />only, with unanimous consent of the Council. <br /> <br />Mr.Nick Dershon, 285 Waite Street, objected to the assessment on the basis that the sewer would be of <br />no benefit since the land lies within the proposed right-of-way for the Eugene-Mapleton Highway. The <br />Public Works Director explained it was the intent to enter into agreement with owners of properties <br />lying within the projected right-of-way to defer collection of the assessment unt~l the State acquires <br />the land. He said no interest would be charged during the deferment period. He also said there were <br />several otherproperties within the right-of-way: on which agreement similar to that authorized with <br />Mr. Reiersgaard on deferment of collection would have to be made. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Arnold Fowler, owner.of property at Waite and Elmira Road, objected to the assessment for three <br />stubs to his property'when only one was requested. The Public Works Director' explained the addi- <br /> <br />tional stubs were installed because of the potential for development of the property. He recommended <br />deferment of the cost-of two of the stubs untilthe property is developed. . <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />3/11/68 - 17 <br />