<br />7....-.'~.
<br />~'
<br />
<br />;..-
<br />
<br />3/10/69
<br />
<br />,
<br />
<br />unnecessary and that Bell Street could have provided access to the same location. Public Works
<br />;Director explained that there were grade and drainage problems, and that improvement of this street
<br />'was done on dedicated rights of way, which were part of an overall plan.
<br />
<br />" '
<br />
<br />Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mr. McDonald that the
<br />number only, with unanimous consent of the Council.
<br />read the second time by council bill number only.
<br />
<br />bill be read the s,econd time by council bill
<br />Motion carried unanimously, and the bill was
<br />
<br />Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mr. McDonald that the
<br />number only, with unanimous consent of the Council.
<br />the third time by council bill number only.
<br />
<br />bill be read the third time by council bill
<br />Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read
<br />
<br />Mrs. Haywarp moved seconded by Mr. McDonald that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall
<br />vote. All coun~ilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbereds15545.
<br />
<br />1 Council Bill No. 8716 - Levying assessments for pa~ing and sanitary and storm sewers in 1st Addition,
<br />tbeEdgewood West was submitted and read the first time in full on February 3, 1969 and held over to
<br />February 24, 1969 meeting to allow proper notice of assessment to be given owners of affected properties,
<br />and held for final approval until a report from the City administration regarding written objections'
<br />:filed by Mr. Camerot on behalf of the property owner was received.
<br />
<br />The City Attorney recommended that the Council proceed with final passage of this ordinance, since the
<br />legality of this type assessment is being tested in court. .
<br />
<br />,
<br />
<br />,Mr. Henry J. Camerot, attorney; ,identified the lots involved, and reviewed the reasons for the complaint. '
<br />He explained that properties in a new subdivision are paying not only for storm sewers within their
<br />,area, but for the storm sewers in the entire area.' He labeled it as discrimination. Developers would
<br />hot protest if older subdivisions were assessed in the same manner.
<br />
<br />The Manager explained that meetings were held between subdividers and the city staff to discuss this
<br />matter, and owners of homes previously built had been paying property taxes and sewer user charges,
<br />~metimes for many years. This was felt to be an equitable assessment. New subdivisions receive
<br />top priority for new sewers, and a large proportion of money budgeted for this purpose.
<br />
<br />Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mr. McDonald that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall
<br />vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed ,and numbered 15546.
<br />
<br />2 Council Bill 8721 - Levying assessments for paving, sanitary and storm sewers 'wit~mn 160 feet west
<br />of Brittany Street was read the first time in full on February 3, 1969 and hiUd over, to the February 24,
<br />1969 meeting to allow proper notice of assessment to be given owners of affected properties, and held
<br />for final app~ova1 until a report back from the' City Administration regarding written objections 'filed'
<br />~y Mr. Camerot on behalf of the property owners. ,
<br />
<br />The City Attorney recommended that the Council proceed with final passage of these assessment ordinances,
<br />since the legality of this type assessment is being tested in court.
<br />
<br />II
<br />
<br />Mr. Henry J. Camerot, attorney, identifreed the lots involved, and reviewed the 'reasons for complaint.
<br />He explained that properties in a new subdivision are paying not only for storm sewers within their area, ,
<br />but for the storm sewers in the entire area. He labeled it as discrimination. Developers would not
<br />~otest if older subdivisions were assessed in the same manner.
<br />
<br />The Manager explained that meetings were held "between subdividers and city staff .to discuss this matter,
<br />and owners of homes previously built had been paying property taxes and sewer user charges, sometimes
<br />for many years. This was felt to be an equitable assessment. New subdivisions receive top priority
<br />for new sewers, and a large propertion of money budgeted for this purpose.
<br />
<br />Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mr. McDonald that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall
<br />vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 15547.
<br />
<br />3 Council Bill No. 8729 - Levying assessments for pavirtg,sanitary and storm sewers iri 2nd addition
<br />to Footlliills West was submitted and read in full the first time on Febnuary 3, 1969 and held over to
<br />the February 24, 1969 meeting to allow proper notice of assessment to be given owners of affected proper-
<br />ties, and held for final approval until a report back from the City administration regarding written
<br />objections filed by Mr. Camerot on behalf of the property owners.
<br />
<br />the City Attorney recommended that the Council proceed with final passage of the ordinance, since the
<br />~ega1ity of this type assessment is being tested in court.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />~. Henry J. Camerot, attorney, identified the lots involved,. and reviewed the reasons for compiliaint.
<br />He explained that properties in a new subdivision are paying not only for storm sewers within their area,
<br />but for the storm sewers in the entire area; He labeled it as discrimination. Developers would not
<br />protest if older subdivisions were assessed in the same .manner.
<br />
<br />The Manager explained that meetings were held between subdividers and city staff to discuss this matter,
<br />and owners of homes previously built had been paying property taxes and .sewer user charges, sometimes.
<br />for many years. This was felt to be an 'equitabLe assessment. .New subdivisions receive top priority for
<br />new sewers, and a large proportion of money budgeted for this purpase.
<br />
<br />Mrs. Hayward. moved seconded by Mr. McDonald that.the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollca,ll
<br />vote. All councilmen present, voting. aye, the, bill w~s declared pBssed and numbered 15548.
<br />
<br />4 Council Bill No. 8731 - Levying assessmen.ts for paving Minda Drive from Norkenzie, Road" to 'Gilham
<br />
<br />Road and Long Island Drive from Minda Drive to south boundary of Orchard. Terrace; also sanitary sewer
<br />on Minda Drive from Gilham Road to Norkenzie Road, and on Long Island Drive from Minda Drive to south ~
<br />1/10U:'Q - 1') ....
<br />
|