03/24/1969 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

,... 90 e 3 '24/69" attendance qf Planning Commission members at meetings. Motion carried. I Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mr. McDonald that Item 4 of the Committee report be approved. Motion carried. 1 5. Dog Control Ordinance - The Manager suggested that the Council take action on thi's ordinance at its next regular meeting. (Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mr. McDonald that the Council adopt tne ordinance on Dog Control as I presented. I I 11 II Ii II I I , II I i I I Mrs. HaYwqrd ~ommented that some prov~s~on should be made for protection of dogs being provoked to bark. The City Attorney said this could be handled administratively. There was discussion regarding notification of owners, and it was ,pointed out that public notice was provided by posting on the bulletin board of the City Hall. It was felt that posting at the Humane Society would be more practical, and the Council agreed 'that this provision should be changed. e Mr. Earl McVickers, Manager of Lane County Humane Society, suggested elimination of ;the words "Dog Control Officer" and substitution of "Animal Control Officer for the City of E'ugene". Council discussed disbursement of funds received from detention fee of $20.00 and the boarding fee. This will be studied and an equitable system worked out. Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mr. Gribskov to amend the dog contr'ol ordinance to "Dog Control Officer" and substitute therefor "Animat Control Officer" and to 'add Humane Society" the words "or representative of animal shelter". Motion carried. eliminate the words after the words "Lane I The Council then voted on the main motion in favor of adoption of the Dog Control Ordinance as amended. Motion carried. 'I 21 j I 31 II II 11 If II I I ,I II 11 II I' I' il Ii II 11 41\ II II ,I '/ I I 51 I, i I ! Other Items: 1. Dog Control Or~inance ~ Discussed under Item 5 of Committee Report for March 19th. No action taken. 2. Planning Commission Report, March 4, 1969 a. Recommended zoning change denials 1) C. Robert Suess., south side of 36th Avenue between Hilyard and West Amazon, R-2 to RG - The Manager explained that Mr. Suess had, developed this, property uJ1der an R-2 Perm- is.sive Use, and that the property now requested for rezoning was to be used for recreational purposes under provisions of the original request. Mr. Suess now proposes to develop' it to a high density to be used for rental units for low-cost housing. Mr. Suess explained to the Council his reasons for the request for increased density, and that he planned a planting buffer to protect adjacent residential housing. Mrs. Hayward agreed with the Planning Commission that the intent of the development was, admirable, but that it would impose unnecessary_hardship on nearby property owners of single family dwellings. I =, :;' Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mr. McDonald' to uphold the recommendation of the Planning Commission to deny the r.~quest ror change of zone. The Council discussed the plans'Mr. Suess proposed and best use for the property. The question was called for and the motion carried. e 2) E. B. Sahlstrom, north side bf intersection or Portland Street and Willamette Street, RA to R-3 - The Manager explained that the Planning Commission had denied this request, since this property acts as a buffer for the residential. area to the west, and because of critical traffic problems in the area. Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mr.' McDonald to uphold the recommendation of.the Planning Commission to deny this zone change. Motion carried. 3) A. W. Berg, 13th and Lawrence, R-3 to C-2' - The Manager explained that Mr. Berg has constructed a building which provides ground floor commercial space with apartments aobve on the corner of 13th Avenue and Lawrence in an area zoned C-2. He wishes to expand this development to the west with similar buildlngs. The Planning Commission recommended denial on grounds there is a great deal of unused C-2 property in the area at the present time~ so no justification can be fbund for added C-2 zoning. I I i I II .1 :! ....: ~ i Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mr. McDonald to follow the recommendation of the Planning Commission to deny this request for zone change. I Mr. Larry Cooley, 3308 Olive, represented Mr. Ber'g and explained that this was a unique situation, in that Mr. Berg wanted to continue the design of the building now existing. He felt in ~ight of the hardship ~mposed upon him by this zoning that C-2 should be extended to the west. The Planning Director pointed out that there is sufficient'C-2 in this area which has pot been used. Under. the Zonipg Ordinance, Mr. Berg could utilize his ground floor area for a clinic for healing arts under a conditional use permit. e 3/24/69 - 4