|
<br />O~~68
<br />
<br />5/12/69
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />II
<br />
<br />II
<br />,[
<br />:1
<br />:1
<br />I'
<br />!:
<br />; ~
<br />il
<br />H
<br />!i
<br />II
<br />I'
<br />II
<br />!i
<br />;1
<br />'I
<br />:1
<br />I
<br />;;
<br />"
<br />:1
<br />!i
<br />r!
<br />I:
<br />Ii
<br />"
<br />I'
<br />,
<br />"
<br />
<br />Mayor Ande~son thought it might be well to discuss this metter with the School Board, and suggested
<br />that the motion include that they be contacted as to the set-up of such a committee. Mrs. Hayward
<br />asked if the Council .could have a report back at. the committee of the whole meeting to see whether
<br />formation of a committee would be possible. The Manager questioned whether the school board could
<br />make this decision before having another meeting.
<br />
<br />In answer. to Councilman Mohr's question,. Mrs.
<br />resolved by this committee, but this seemed a
<br />the City Council and the School Board.
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />Hayward said she was not sure any questions could be I
<br />I:
<br />serious problem, which would require discussion between I
<br />,
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />I
<br />'I
<br />L
<br />II
<br />'I
<br />,
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />:I
<br />II
<br />i'
<br />II
<br />'I
<br />I,
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />. ,I
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />If
<br />ii
<br />'i
<br />Ii
<br />]I
<br />II
<br />II
<br />I,
<br />Ii
<br />
<br />Mayor Anderson said, since ~here have now been formal complaints, it might be well to proceed to a
<br />discussion with the school board, rather than having hearings on separate items. At least portions
<br />of the problem might be alleviated.
<br />
<br />Mr. Mohr suggested that residents of the area should go through proper channels with an appeal to
<br />the Sign Board of Appeals.
<br />
<br />Mr. ~ohn Axtel, 2573 Sharon Way, asked if the matter before the Council was whether or not the bill-
<br />hoards should be draped. Mrs. Hayward explained that the original- recommendation from the Planning
<br />Commission was that they would allow the billboards to go up, and decide about whether they needed
<br />to be draped after they had been erected. The Council' is delaying action on that decision by
<br />tabling the motion at this time.
<br />
<br />i!
<br />i
<br />'I
<br />:i
<br />I:
<br />,I
<br />'I
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />I
<br />I.
<br />I'
<br />,
<br />I'
<br />.J
<br />"
<br />I,
<br />'I
<br />1
<br />if
<br />Ii
<br />I'
<br />"
<br />,I
<br />I:
<br />I'
<br />Il
<br />II
<br />,I
<br />Ii
<br />I'
<br />"
<br />II
<br />r
<br />!;
<br />
<br />A vote was taken on the motion to table.
<br />
<br />Motion 'carriedwith Mr . Mohr opposed.
<br />
<br />At this point Mr. Mohr left the meeting.
<br />
<br />6.
<br />
<br />Airport Transfer, Lane County - The City Manager, City Attorney, Mayor and others, met with
<br />tpe County Commissioners to discuss a possible transfer of the airport from the City to the
<br />County. County Commissioners have voted-to assume responsibility for the airport after
<br />they have a method of financing the debt which the airport now carries. Hopefully, they
<br />will be able to do this as of July, 1970. They have asked that the City Council take an ~,
<br />official position in this matter, so that they will know that there is official concurrence
<br />in the idea. The airport,' including all of the land which has been purchased, would be
<br />turned over to the County. There would be a token payment for this value, and the County
<br />would propose to assume all existing debt service. . .
<br />
<br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. McDonald that the City Council go on record as taking the
<br />official position that the City would sell to Lane Countyfor$l.OO'its -entire interest
<br />in the airport,'on the condition that the County provide the funds to operate the airport
<br />and assume all debt service.
<br />
<br />"
<br />t:
<br />I,
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />:1
<br />"
<br />Ii
<br />'I
<br />"
<br />:t
<br />
<br />I'
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />I
<br />Ii
<br />If
<br />,t
<br />t,
<br />"
<br />i:
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />In answer to Councilwoman Hayward's question, the Manager said the City would make a determination ,:
<br />I'
<br />of the assets of the Airport, based upon the appraised,price of the land. At the present time, he ,I
<br />does not know what the figure is. In answer to her question concerning a City-County arrangement, Ii
<br />the Manager said this was discussed Driefly, but was co:n?~d~red to .be_ajI!1inistratively less desirable. I;
<br />Responsibility for the operation should be centered with one legislative body. . Ii
<br />II
<br />
<br />Mr. Juilfs, Airport Manager, ~aid there was no question the tax base had to be"broadened,
<br />and this would be one solution. Another solution would be formation of a'separate port
<br />authority 0rf~district that could be established in conjunction with the sewer study, and
<br />other transportation as well. Both have their advantages. A port authority would create
<br />another political entity, but its primary interest would be the airport. A County Commis-
<br />sion interested in developing the airport would be fine, but it could be kept behind other
<br />County activities.
<br />
<br />A vote was taken on the motion as stated.
<br />
<br />Motion carried.
<br />
<br />Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mr. McDonald to approve Item 6 of the Committee report.
<br />
<br />Vote taken on motion as stated.. Rollcall.
<br />
<br />All councilmen present voting aye, motion carried.
<br />
<br />7.
<br />
<br />Establishment of Warrant Sinking Fund - The Director of Finance explained the~establis~ment
<br />of an improvement warrant fund, and its use as a reserve to fund overruns on assessment
<br />contracts.
<br />
<br />
<br />Mrs. Beal moved, seconded by Mrs. Hayward, to approve an ordinance to establish a reserve
<br />account for the improvement warrant sinking fund. Motion carried.
<br />
<br />Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mr. McDonald to approve Item 7 of theCommittee report.
<br />councilmen present voting aye, motion carried.
<br />
<br />Rollcall.
<br />
<br />I:
<br />:;
<br />ii
<br />
<br />"
<br />"
<br />,I
<br />I,
<br />II
<br />~ I
<br />
<br />8.
<br />
<br />Gilham Road Options
<br />a. Glen D~ Heisler, 1430 Gilham Road
<br />b. Donald Davis, 1985 Gilham Road
<br />c. William F. Renken, Jr., 900 Gilham Road
<br />
<br />$375.00
<br />325..00
<br />300.00
<br />
<br />Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mr. Gribskov to approve exercise of the options listed above.
<br />Motion carried.
<br />
<br />i,
<br />II
<br />II
<br />1\
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />~J
<br />
<br />Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mr. McDonald to approve Item 8 of ~he Committee report.
<br />
<br />All Ie councilmen present voting aye, the motion carried.
<br />
<br />Rollcall.
<br />
<br />5/12/69 - 5
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />-
<br />
<br />I'
<br />Ii
<br />I
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />'I
<br />II
<br />II
<br />,I
<br />All ii
<br />:1
<br />II
<br />II
<br />j
<br />11
<br />I'
<br />II
<br />i/
<br />II
<br />If
<br />II
<br />,I
<br />I:
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
|