Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'" <br /> 36~ I e <br /> , <br /> . --- -... - ----- ~--- -- -- --- ---- ~, -'- - ~- ~ . . - .--- -- - <br /> would contact Dr. Purdy. I <br /> Dr. Purdy asked staff for a copy of the franchise, and asked if the City had control over quality <br /> of service or areas to be served in the City, as well as rate increases. They should be paid for <br /> their service, .but should.supply services the people e~pect for what they pay. Mrs. Hayward <br /> asked Dr. Purdy to look into Teleprompter customer contracts. It was her understanding that some <br /> contracts had a clause saying the rate would never be increased, and even if they moved, they <br /> would be served with cable. <br />I Vote taken on motion. Motion carried. <br />I <br />I 10. Court Decision, Sahlstrom Abatement ~ The Circuit Court has ruled that the City <br />II <br /> erroneously ordered this abatement. In view of this decision, any stop work order <br />II for completion of this structure should be immediately removed. The City Charter <br />II gives the Council authority to prevent erection of dangerous buildings or .powerto <br /> order removal of any building that becomes d~ngerous. The purpose is to attempt to <br />I bring buildings up to code specifications. Judge Cottrell ruled that there was no danger e <br /> to neighbors, except to trespassers on the property, and found the bui ld ing could be <br />I brought up to code, and that the City had made a mistake in ordering the abatement. <br /> In answer to Councilman Purdy, the City Attorney said a counter suit has not been <br />I <br /> brought by adrj!acent property owners, and the matter is now finish~d, as far as the <br /> I City is concerned. <br /> Mr. Mohr commented that this Council had taken no action. on the abatement, since, the I <br />II matter was in the .court at that time. <br />I Mr. Henry Baitis asked to have the record show that, in his opinion, corrections <br />I required by the Building Department to bring the building. up to code had not been <br /> made. <br /> Mr. Mohr commented, that Mr. Baitis should submit this statement as a written notice <br /> j to the City that he is filing an appeal. <br /> I <br />,I Mr. Baitis said he wanted to complain against the city of Eugene for allowing an illegal <br />II subdivision, and felt the City had been in error in this matter. <br />II <br /> Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mr. McDonald to receive and file Item 10 of the Committee report. <br />It <br />II Motion carried. <br />it <br />q <br />I, ll. Cancellation of Contract, Lassen Bros. Builders - Lassen Bros. have decided they prefer <br />II <br /> to have a storm sewer constructed on their subdivision under;private contract. No <br />Ii payments have been made, and staff recommends the contract be cancelled. <br />I' Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Dr. Purdy to cancel the contract of Lassen Bros. for <br />II <br />,I storm sewer construction on their subdivision. Motion carried. <br />,I Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mr. McDonald to approve Item 11 of the ~ommittee report. Rollcall I <br />'i vote. All councilmen present voting aye, motion carried. <br />II <br />II <br />I 12. Lease Extension, Child Care, Inc. ,- Request has been made 'to renew'the lease of .Child <br />I Care on city-owned property under the same terms and conditions. Director of Parks <br />i recommends extension of existing lease. <br />I <br />I <br />I Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Gribskov to extend the lease for Child Care, Inc., for <br />I one year. <br />II ,- <br /> Mrs. Hayward asked the basis of the lease, regarding rent. Parks Director said this <br />!I building is rent free under the lease. They pay all utilities. <br /> I Dr. Purdy asked who was ~esponsible for upkeep, and said the house and grounds look <br />I <br />I real nice. <br />! <br /> I <br />ii Mr. Smith said the Parks Departm~nt is responsible for upkeep and had recently painted <br />I the house. <br /> I Vote taken on motion. Mo tion carr ied . <br /> I, <br /> Mrs. Hayward.moved seconded by Mr. McDonald to approve Item 12 of the Committee report. Rollcall <br /> ,I vote. All councilmen present voting aye, motion carried. <br /> II <br /> II 13. Petition for Paving of Galloway Court - Petitioned by owners of 100% of the property. I <br /> II Staff recommends 'approval. <br /> Ii Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mr. Gribskov that the Council approve the petition for <br /> 'I <br /> I paving of Galloway Court. Motion carried. <br /> I <br /> I <br /> Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mr. McDonald to approve Item 13 of the Committee report. Motion <br /> carried. <br /> \1 14. Planning Commission Report of September 22, 1969 - Planning Commission recommended that e <br /> curb sidewalks be allowed in the 2300 block, east side of Friendly Street, based on <br /> written request by property owners for change in original action taken September 6, 1966 <br />~i! lQ/13/69 - 8 I <br />