Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />""Ill <br /> <br />-.621 <br /> <br />3.L2.2L21 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />',;1 <br />II V. <br />II <br />I, <br /> <br />ii <br />I' <br />II *A. <br />Ii 3/10/71 <br /> <br />i: <br />p <br />i: <br />" <br />,I <br />'I <br />\I <br />,I <br />" <br />! <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />i ~ <br />I, <br />I, <br />I' B <br />I' . <br />Ii 3/10/71 <br />1 <br />" <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />C. <br />3/10/71 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Items to be considered with one motion, after discussion of individual items, if-requested. <br />These items were discussed at committee meetings of March 10 and 17, 1971 except for items <br />R. and S. <br /> <br />Report of Ad Hoc Committee Re: Charges for Parking Meter Hoods - Councilman Gribskov <br />reported that the committee had met with members of the Associated General Contractors, <br />and that they had considered both sides of the issues. They agreed that the present <br />fees of $100 per year, $2.00 per day and $8.00 per week continue as per Ordinance #15763 <br />dated July 28, 1969. The committee also recommended, however, that consideration be <br />given to the ffes of $15.00 per month, $35.00 quarterly and $60.00 per six months. The <br />committee therefore concurred with the staff report. Mr. Gribskov stated that it was the <br />unanimous decision of the committee that the parking meters are meant for shoppers who <br />patron{~e downtown merchants and that putting hoods over the meters cuts down on the <br />number of such meters available. <br /> <br />Mr. Gribskov moved seconded by Mr. Teague that the City Manager be <br />the Associated General Contractors of the committee recommendation <br />ordinance outlining additional rates, as prescribed by the report. <br /> <br />directed to advise <br />and to draft an <br />Motion carried <br /> <br />approve <br /> <br />Legislation, H.B. 1700 and S.B. 126 - Mr. Drapela of Parks and Recreation Department out- <br />lined the ,purposes of these two bills. He said they will give the Highway Commission <br />power of condemnation for land to be set aside for,recreation trails. It appropriates <br />money for such trails and provides tax exemption status for private land-owners who <br />would provide the needed land. <br /> <br />H.B. 1700 would provide appropriation of funds from the State Highway Commission. 1% of <br />its annual budget would be set aside for trails along highways, roads and streets. Mr. <br />Jordan felt the Highway Commission would probably support these bills. <br /> <br />Mrs. Campbell requested that someone testify in behalf of this bill. She suggested that <br />the City meet with County Commissioners and explore the possibility of joint testimony. <br /> <br />approve <br /> <br />Proposal for Solid Waste Separation and Recycling Demonstration - Jack B. Carmichael, <br />President of Environmental Dynamics asked for Council support for a demonstration project <br />for recycling solid wastes and for an application to the Federal Environmental Protection <br />Agency. He presented a slide program which emphasized the need for recycling resources, <br />and pointed out that the Resource Recovery Act of 1970 provides up to 75% federal funding <br />for a municipal recycling demonstration project. <br /> <br />Dr. Carmichael stated that his agency would utilize the experience of previously tested <br />waste disposal programs. No other such project is presently being carried out in the <br />nation. He has only a rough estimate of the cost of such a project. He asked for semi- <br />formal authorization to proceed to prepare such data as part of a pre-';'proposal. He <br />emphasized that the city contribution could be in-kind, and that.the, application for the <br />grant would be for three years. The demonstration, as he envisions it, would be city-wide. <br /> <br />Dr. Carmichael has contacted Mr. Wallace Swanson, chairman of the Garbage Board, and is <br />also aware of the activities of the Eugene Mission and St. Vincent de Paul. His agency <br />has no intention of denying an important source of income to these charitable organizations <br />and is aware of the need to proceed in a mutually sensitive manner. In reply to Counci~- <br />man Mohr, he said it may be necessary to carry out an education program and first phase <br />demonstration in a specific neighborhood to educate housewives to segregate their solid <br />waste. <br /> <br />Theaty Manager indicated that one of the primary problems would be development of markets <br />and physical facilities to handle the recycling. To make the project economically possible, <br />a large volume would be required. <br /> <br />Mr. Unger from the Eugene Mission stated that the Mission is now collecting an estimated <br />50% of local newspapers,but its major problem is in educating the public. The Mission <br />has invested a large sum in its facilities, and is able to operate economically through <br />the use of volunteers. <br /> <br />Leo Seigel, Eugene Salvage Company, has made a number of studies dealing with the feasibi- <br />lity of collecting such items as cardboard, glass and tin cans, but has come to the con- <br />clusion that such recycling is not economically sound. <br /> <br />Bob Christiansen is presently working on a federal research project, "Rehabilitation in <br />Lane County," funded by an HEW grant, and has concluded that labor costs are the major <br />drawback to such , efforts. He, too, was concerned about the incentive for houswives to <br />segregate garbage for proper collection and recycling. <br /> <br />In answer to Mr. Christiansen,Dr. Carmichael said this type recycling would reduce the <br />landfill area needed by one-third. The County now loses $325,000 in its landfill <br />operation per year. <br /> <br />*Items printed in italics are from committee reports <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />3/22/71 - 4 <br /> <br />.....lIl <br />