|
<br />,...
<br />
<br />I
<br />-I
<br />
<br />676
<br />
<br />4/26/71
<br />
<br />I
<br />II
<br />I:
<br />Ii
<br />ii
<br />'I
<br />I,
<br />I'
<br />I'
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />il
<br />tI
<br />II
<br />II
<br />I:
<br />!
<br />,
<br />i
<br />I
<br />,
<br />,
<br />I
<br />II
<br />I!
<br />,I
<br />ii
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />11
<br />It
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />il
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />It
<br />I: IV.
<br />"
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />ii
<br />I:
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />ii
<br />"
<br />I'
<br />if
<br />I'
<br />,I
<br />:1 V.
<br />I'
<br />il
<br />II
<br />II Commi ttee Report on Item I, Page 1, of these minutes, which were omitted before discussion
<br />!i at this meeting:
<br />
<br />114/21/71 Request of SACC for support of vietnam Disengagement Act - Mrs. Susan Hanning, represen-
<br />Ii r',': tati ve of the Spring Action Coordinating Commi ttee, distributed two resolutions to the
<br />I, Council and explained that the first urged the City Council to send a statement to
<br />,I Representative De11enback urging him to support the Vietnam Disengagement Act (HB 4100)
<br />i~ and the second urged the Ci ty Counci 1 to place on the ballot before the ci ti zens' of
<br />Ii Eugene a resolution to end the war in Indochina. Mrs. Hanning said the Coordinating
<br />I! Commi ttee represents all' the peace groups in Eugene.
<br />
<br />I:
<br />II
<br />I;
<br />,I
<br />ji
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />I,
<br />I'
<br />,I
<br />1J
<br />:1
<br />!I
<br />,I
<br />ii
<br />,I
<br />r.
<br />'I
<br />I:
<br />,
<br />
<br />I(
<br />\,
<br />Ii
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />4. SIDEWALK
<br />Donald Street adj to TL 18 03 19
<br />3602 (btn Fox Hollow Rd & 53rd Ave
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />:1
<br />'I
<br />I,
<br />It
<br />II
<br />!:
<br />'I
<br />II
<br />'I
<br />II
<br />il
<br />ii
<br />Ii
<br />I,
<br />:1
<br />:i
<br />II
<br />I'
<br />I
<br />II
<br />!I
<br />II
<br />1,
<br />'I
<br />1,
<br />:1
<br />'I
<br />"
<br />II
<br />
<br />Councilman Teague requested that action be withheld so that the Council could look at the location 11
<br />on tour. Public Works Director said this would be no problem.
<br />
<br />Fred Stubbert
<br />Wiilldish Const. Co.
<br />Devereaux & Pratt
<br />
<br />1,824.16
<br />2,162.37
<br />2,173.69
<br />
<br />2,280.20 (one property)
<br />
<br />o
<br />
<br />Public Works Department recommends award of all four projects to low bidder.
<br />
<br />On Item 2, Mr. John Horn, 1170 Pearl, said he
<br />opposed to paving of this alley. He said Mr.
<br />alley, and they too are opposed. They do not
<br />their property, but that it is solely for the
<br />
<br />represented Mr. Bernard Strassmier, who was
<br />Strassmier has contacted other owners on the
<br />feel that improvement of the alley will benefit
<br />benefit of the Salvation Army.
<br />
<br />Mr. James Redeen, Architect, said this petition had been initiated because of drainage problems.
<br />The Salvation Army will have almost its entire facility here. There are no storm sewers in the
<br />area, and there is a problem of site drainage. The Church of Christ and an apartment house
<br />would almost certainly benefit from the paving.
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />There was Council discussion concerning construction of sanitary sewer, and maintenance of the
<br />alley if it were not improved.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that
<br />to low bidder, and that Item 2 be withheld
<br />voting aye, the motion carried.
<br />
<br />Items 1, 3 and 4 be accepted and contracts awarded
<br />at this time. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present
<br />
<br />I,
<br />"
<br />"
<br />"
<br />'I
<br />ij
<br />il
<br />II
<br />
<br />"
<br />,I
<br />:i
<br />il
<br />
<br />'I
<br />:1
<br />i:
<br />I,
<br />
<br />Bids, Demolition of House at 2054 Wisconsin (Public Works Department) opened April 23, 1971.
<br />
<br />Two bids were received. Hal Bailey submitted the low bid of $334.00 and Harry Abejin bid
<br />$648.00. Recommend award to the low bidder.
<br />
<br />Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bid be awarded and contract let to the low
<br />bidder, Hal Bailey.
<br />
<br />Ii
<br />il
<br />:1
<br />II
<br />11
<br />:1
<br />'I
<br />i:
<br />.I
<br />:1
<br />II
<br />I'
<br />'I
<br />!I
<br />:1
<br />;1
<br />!j
<br />q
<br />"
<br />:1
<br />:1
<br />II
<br />I,
<br />~ I
<br />:1
<br />I'
<br />,
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />Manager explained that a public hearing was previously held to determine_whether buildings at
<br />this location should be demolished. As a result, the Council decided to proceed, and Hal
<br />Bailey Const. Co. is low bidder on the project. Staff has had correspondence with the owner
<br />of the property in which he objects to this ~ocedure. Staff and the Renewal Agency have
<br />discussed the problem with the property owner, and feel demolition should proce@d.
<br />
<br />Rollcalr.'vote taken on motion as stated.
<br />
<br />All councilmen present voting aye, the motion carried.
<br />
<br />Items to be considered with one motion, after discussion of individual items, if requested.
<br />Items were previously discussed at committee meetings of April 14 and 21, 1971
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />Councilwoman Beal said she had talked with the Mayor and with members of the Spring
<br />Action Coordinating Committee, and that they were agreed that a public hearing should
<br />be held at the April 26 Council meeting.
<br />
<br />,
<br />!
<br />,
<br />,
<br />I
<br />I
<br />,
<br />:1
<br />II
<br />I'
<br />I
<br />'I
<br />:1
<br />"
<br />'I
<br />:1
<br />'I
<br />'I
<br />II
<br />;1
<br />,
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />Mrs. Bea1 moved seconded by Mrs. Campbell that the Council sehedu1e a pub1i c hearing to
<br />discuss a proposed referendum to be placed on the May ballot.
<br />
<br />Councilman Mohr thought a public discussion would be most impot:tant, and that the discussion
<br />should be concerned wi th the referendum measure and the need for such a referendum. The
<br />Counciw could then act on the other resolution proposed by the Committee.
<br />
<br />Mrs. Hanning pointed out that there were two portions to the request, and the motion
<br />included only one resolution. They would also request the Council to come to a decision
<br />regarding its feelings about the war, and that it urge the State's representative to
<br />act on those feelings.
<br />
<br />Mr. Mohr outlined Council problems with resolutions concerning issues outside the limits,
<br />of the City when there was not unanimous support of the Comnci1. The impact ,i's pot as
<br />great as when there is a unanimity of opinion, and there is no way to handle the issue
<br />when there is a di vision of opinion.
<br />
<br />II
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />Mrs. Bea1 suggested that the ~unci1 concentrate its effort at the public hearing on
<br />
<br />4/26/71 - 8
<br />
|