11/01/1971 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

..... e 72 'f 11/1/71 ~ ~ h Ii " I I j' Linder's parking problem, had been able to work out a parking sharing plan , ': i: wi th the bank. :: i COUNCIL BILL NO. 9530 - Rezone property located east of Hilyard Street and ,north of 30th Avenue to RP SR Residential Professional District with Site Review procedures, was submitted, and no councilman present requesting that it be read in full, was read the first time by council bill number only.. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mrs. Beal that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mrs. Beal that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. Councilmen Williams, Campbell, Beal, Teague and'McDonald voted aye. Messrs. Hershner and Mohr voted not. The motion carried and the bill was declared passed and numbered 16329. e 2. Recommended den~al of zone change request a. East of Bailey Hill Road, south of 18th, north of Westleigh Street; RA to R-2 PD (Ellison and Platz) A l,imi ted multiple family development is proposed for this site, which could possibly be tied to the developers PUD development in this location. I In answer to Mr. Mohr, Planning Director explained Planning Commission reason- ing for not allowing high density for this property was that the General Plan allows no more than ten units per acre in this location, and the developer i' would have to stay within the overall density'on the site. Mr. Platz is in agreement with the policy and will include this area in the overall PUD. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the Planning Commission recommendation for denial of a zone change be approved. Motion carried unanimously. , " D. October 18, 1971 l. Zone Change Recommended Denial a. South of Cal Young Road, west of Coburg Road; RA and R-2 to C-l PD and RP PD (Northland Investments, Inc.) Planning Commission requested a legal opinion from the City Attorney about the advisability of this rezoning in view of the Willakenzie Interim Land Use Plan. The Commiffiion was very impressed with the design, but in view of past his-tory and the amount of commercial property available, it was their recommendation to deny the proposal. Planning Director explained that, if a need was felt for more commercial property, the plan should be reviewed, with rezoning done on other than a piecemeal basis. I Mr. Richard E. Miles of Northland Investments read a statement in favor of the zone change request. He outlined reason's to justify Council approval of the request, and arguments against Planning Commissimreasons for denial. " II James Fisher, 1220 Woodside Drive, was against a change in the present zoning II " for the following reasons: 1) that he had recently built a home in the neighborhood with the understanding that it was, and would probably remain, residential zoning; 2) the change was not in accordance with the Willakenzie e Plan or the 1990 Plan for that area; 3) a bad traffic problem exists. 'I A statement of the League of Women Voters, previously entered into Planning Commission minutes, was read to the Council. It protested rezoning of this I: property. Mr. Jim Redden, Architect, asked to explain the philosophy behind the planning for this site, which he termed peculiar. He explained the development, its use to the neighborhood and proposed buffering. Councilman Williams asked for an explanation of the apparent violation of the Willakenzie Plan with the addition of a tremendous amount of R-2. Planning Director explained that the Planning Commission found an excess of C-2 land, which they classified to lesser density. This was not in violation of the Willakenzie Plan. I City Manager explained that the City Attorney's office had suggested that, if it was felt the Interim Willakenzie Plan was no longer valid, a study should be made of the entire area. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the Planning Commission recommendation be ~ccepted and this request denied. Motion carried. 2. Annexation Recommended a. 122 acres south of 43rd and east of Amazon Drive. (Boundary Board referral) e It was noted that this is a residential area with a high percentage of failing septic tanks which drain into the city. 11/1/71 - 5 ...