|
<br /> """Il
<br /> e 7'18
<br /> 12/13/71
<br /> II
<br /> I !I
<br /> Ii
<br /> I Request for Mobile Home for NIght Watchman - J. & L. Mobile Homes, 1790 Highway 99 N
<br /> Ii E.
<br /> !I
<br /> , has requested pernlission to use a mobile home for night watchman on their business
<br /> site. The site is in the proper zoning area, and has been inspected by the Building
<br /> Department, whi ch has recommended approval.
<br /> Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that a hearing be called on this request.
<br /> Motion carried. Approve
<br /> 'I
<br /> " F. Assessment Segregation, Transwestern_Investors - The site requested for segregation
<br /> "
<br /> is located on Dakota Street, and the amount to be paid is $1,002.29. Staff recommends
<br /> approval.
<br /> Mr. Mohr m:>ved seconded by ,Ujr. Gribskov to approve the segregation outlined above.
<br /> Motion carried. .. Approve
<br /> .. - . -
<br /> e G. Highway l26,Review of Planning,"Commi'ssioi:J Recommendation of No.vember. 22 - Mayor Anderson
<br /> suggested that the specIfic items proposed in the Plap,njngCommission recommendation be
<br /> revi ewed . Commission concerns referred to the Council at its meeting of November 22
<br /> were:
<br /> 1. That alternative routes for the freeway between the River Road inter-
<br /> change and Washington-Jefferson Streets be considered and that at
<br /> I least three alternate routes be included in the Environmental Impact
<br /> Study.
<br /> a) That important consideration be gi ven to selection of these
<br /> , , routings to nlininlize the impact of the routings on the Willamette
<br /> River
<br /> b) That consideration not be linlited solely to altepnatives that tie
<br /> in with the proposed Skinner's Butte Freeway; and 1
<br /> c) That consideration be given to alternative routes in light of their
<br /> effect upon the supply of low cost housing and small businesses,
<br /> since these experience financial difficulty in relocation.
<br /> 2. That hearings on E-SATS be started with the intent that accepted procedures
<br /> be established for initiation and analysis of any proposed E-SATS route
<br /> prior to reconsideration of the proposed Highway 126, but not with the
<br /> purpose of approving or disapproving any specific route or collection of
<br /> routes.
<br /> 3. That a local multidisciplinary team be appointed by the Mayor and City Council
<br /> to study the alternative routes and make recommendations to the Oregon
<br /> State Highway Division on the concerns to be incorporated in the Environ-
<br /> mental Impact Study and to make recmmmendations to the Planning Commission
<br /> 'I and City Council on the final Environmental Impact Study, in light of the city of
<br /> II Eugene's Community Goals and Policies. This commi ttee should be engaged in the
<br /> ,I Environmental Impact Study to the fullest extent possible and should represent
<br /> "
<br /> " a broad variety of disciplines~
<br /> ,
<br /> ,
<br /> I Mr. Howard Bonnett, Planning Commission member, commented on the make-up of the committee
<br /> recommended by the Planning Commission to make recommendations to the Oregon State
<br /> Highway Division on concerns to be incorporated in the Environmental Impact Study.
<br /> "
<br /> ,
<br /> ,
<br /> " Williams, City Manager said that the State Highway Department is respon-
<br /> In answer to Mr.
<br /> sible for preparation of the statement, and that funding for the statement would be
<br /> limi ted to a parti cular:'.proposal ~ If that proposal is considered unacceptable after
<br /> " the statement is developed, alternative routing would have to go through the same process.
<br /> l'
<br /> :,
<br /> e Mrs. Niven explained that the Planning Commission had suggested only that there be
<br /> :1 comparison of alternatives, on the basis of cost of land acquisi bon and other cost
<br /> "
<br /> factors.
<br /> Mr. Mohr suggested that the City Attorney be directed to prepare a brief of the requi'Ie-
<br /> ments of the NEPA.
<br /> i
<br /> " After some discussion concerning the..B-SATS Plan and its relation to the 1990 Plan, Mr.
<br /> Williams moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that, regarding Items la, lb and lc, the Ci ty Council
<br /> instruct the City Manager to draft a letter to the State Highway commission voicing
<br /> 1 the concerns raised by the Planning Commission after public hearings, and expressing
<br /> "
<br /> i the Council's desire that these considerations be included in the on-coming review
<br /> ,
<br /> process; and further, that the State Highway Commission advise the Council, as soon
<br /> as possible, of their ability to include these considerations in that review procedure.
<br /> I In answer to Mrs. Campbell, Mr. ,Williams said he had exitluded Items 2 and 3 because
<br /> 'I
<br /> I: he di d not feel they related to the State Highway Commission. Mrs. Campbell fel tit
<br /> was important for them to know that these were considerations on the local level.
<br /> I , City Manager was not sure of the intent of the m:>tion, as it applied to Item lb.
<br /> ,
<br /> He said that a Skinner's Butte Freeway, ,or some other facili ty to accomrrodate known
<br /> " neeqs, should not be ignored. Perhaps the statement should say that the Skinner's
<br /> II
<br /> Butte Freeway, or some alternative, should be included.
<br /> e Mr. Williams felt perhpas his motion should be revised to ask the State Highway
<br /> _'.e<o
<br /> 12/31/71 - 4
<br /> ....
<br />
|