Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> The motion carried 5:2 with Councilors Schue, Holmer, Bascom <br /> Rutan, and Hansen voting aye and Councilors Ehrman and Miller <br /> e voting nay. <br /> Res. No. 4009--A resolution opposing Ballot Measure 12. <br /> Ms. Ehrman moved, seconded, by Ms. Schue, to adopt the <br /> resolution opposing Ballot Measure 12. The motion carried <br /> 6:1 with Councilors Schue, Holmer, Bascom, Ehrman, Rutan, <br /> and Hansen voting aye and Councilor Miller voting nay. <br /> III. WORK SESSION: ENTRANCE BEAUTIFICATION STUDY <br /> City Manager Micheal Gleason introduced consideration of the Draft Entrance <br /> Beautification Study. Pat Decker of the Planning Department gave the staff <br /> report. Ms. Decker revi ewed the study and then reviewed the changes <br /> recommended by the Planning Commission and the staff. <br /> Answering a question from Ms. Bascom, Ms. Decker said Policy #7 in the draft <br /> study recommends that the site review suffix be applied to improvements along <br /> the entrance corridors and that the site review criteria address several <br /> things. She said the Planning Commission recommended that an amendment to the <br /> code be used instead of the site review suffix. The code amendment would take <br /> effect when properties are improved or developed and probably would apply only <br /> to landscaping and buffering. Ms. Brody added that a code amendment would <br /> affect more properties immediately than the site review suffix because new <br /> development along the corridors would be required to provide landscapi~g and <br /> e bufferi ng. <br /> Replying to questions from Mr. Holmer, Ms. Decker said the code amendment <br /> process probably would provide more certainty than the site review process but <br /> standards for landscaping and buffering would have to be developed for the <br /> code amendment process. The Planning Commission recommended that pedestrian <br /> and bi cycl e facil it i es shoul d be incorporated into improvements "wherever <br /> they are needed" instead of "where appropriate." Ms. Decker said access to <br /> busineses would be the criterion for "wherever they are needed.1I <br /> Ms. Bascom said she favors the phrase "where appropri ate. II <br /> Answering questions from Ms. Ehrman, Ms. Decker said the Development <br /> Department staff recommended the term "downtown" be used instead of "city <br /> center.1I The Downtown Commission and the Planning Commission agreed with the <br /> recommendation. She said several commissioners indicated it is difficult to <br /> know what is in a "city center" but a "downtown" is easily identified. They <br /> noted that efforts are being made to strengthen Eugene's downtown. She said <br /> peop 1 e i ndi cated duri ng the Communi ty Goals process that "city center" is <br /> somewhat obsolete and that "downtown" is a stronger term. She said replacing <br /> signs with the term "downtown" will not be expensive because signs have to be <br /> replaced periodically. <br /> e MINUTES--Eugene City Council October 8, 1986 Page 5 <br />