Laserfiche WebLink
1030, which would replace all seven percent right-of-way fees with a five percent tax. Ms. Berrian <br />indicated the City would lose millions in revenue if the bill passed. Mr. Heuser said that HB 3353 had been <br />the bill that was actually making progress. Ms. Berrian said the bill was introduced at the behest of Qwest <br />and it was an attack on the Eugene telecommunications model and attempted to preclude other cities from <br />taking the same approach as Eugene. She noted that wireless providers were very opposed to SB 1030 <br />because they do not want any taxation. Mr. Papd asked if the committee's assistance was needed. Mr. <br />Heuser said yes. He was unsure of the fate of the bill, which he had thought would receive a hearing. <br />However, the Senate committees had closed and could hold no more hearings without the permission of the <br />Senate leader. He would inform the committee if the bill progressed. Mr. Papd said he would not worry <br />about putting together talking points unless staff thought the bill was going to move. Mr. Heuser indicated <br />staff was likely to do so in case the bill moved, although they may not be needed. Mr. Papd suggested they <br />be prepared before May 19, when Ms. Taylor and Ms. Bettman would no longer be available. <br /> <br />Priority 2 Bills' <br /> <br />HB 3447 <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Ms. Bettman, Mr. Heuser indicated that House Bill (HB) 3447, which was <br />related to taxation of vehicles weighing more than 26,000 pounds, was probably dead as it had been referred <br />to a committee whose chair was determined to kill it. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman indicated support of the staff recommendation, but if the bill began to make progress she <br />would like to support it if it actually raised revenues. Ms. Boyle indicated the bill was written in a way that <br />made it revenue-neutral. <br /> <br />HB 043 lA <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Ms. Bettman, Mr. Lidz said the bill would delineate what was within the <br />jurisdiction of the Land Use Board of Appeals and what was in the jurisdiction of the Land Conservation <br />and Development Commission. The changes being offered were minimal. He said the bill would help <br />Eugene if it took effect before its Goal 5 periodic review was completed because the City would not have to <br />spend money to fight for the appropriate review body. Ms. Bettman indicated acceptance of the staff <br />recommendation. <br /> <br />Priority 3 Bills <br /> <br />HB 2816 <br /> <br />Mr. Pap~ asked if the bill raised the requirements for placing an initiative on the ballot. Ms. Feldman said <br />the bill added a layer before the ballot title was prepared. Signatures and an affidavit must be filed, <br />although those signatures would count toward the ultimate total. She said the bill would not affect the City <br />and she recommended monitoring it. Mr. Pap~ indicated acceptance of the staff recommendation. <br /> <br />HB 3010 <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Ms. Bettman about the bill, which would prohibit the disclosure of public <br />records relating to criminal investigation, prosecution, or confinement, Mr. Cushman said he believed that <br /> <br />MINUTES--Council Committee on INtergovernmental Relations April 28, 2005 Page 2 <br /> <br /> <br />