Laserfiche WebLink
the information could be released to an auditor or civilian review board if structured to be part of the City <br />organization. He indicated that personal identifiers such as address, date of birth, and Social Security <br />Number etc. would be eliminated, but the name would be available. Ms. Bettman suggested the bill be <br />amended to exclude civilian review boards. Mr. Cushman said it could, but even if it included that <br />amendment, he believed the City could opt to provide that information to an auditor as nothing in the bill <br />precluded that. Mr. Lidz indicated the answer depended on the structure of the civilian review board. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Mr. Pap6, Mr. Lidz said that generally, the Public Records Law allows the <br />government to withhold something, rather than prohibiting the release. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman requested more information about the bill and suggested Mr. Cushman consult the chair of the <br />Police Commission, Tim Laue. She said that Seattle staff had indicated to her that many redactions in a <br />police report were expensive to make and difficult for them to track. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor questioned why a review board would need more than a person's name. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman suggested that a person reviewing the file might find it useful information to know where a <br />person lived if that was relevant to a case. Mr. Cushman agreed. The committee agreed to hold the bill over <br />pending further information. <br /> <br />HB 3392 <br /> <br /> Ms. Taylor, seconded by Ms. Bettman, moved to change the priority of the bill to Priority <br /> 2. The motion passed unanimously. <br /> <br />HB 3443 <br /> <br />Mr. Pap6 asked why staff recommended opposition to the bill, which would create a statewide 2-1-1 <br />telephone number for access to Health and Human Services. Ms. Wilde said the reason was funding. Such <br />a system was very expensive to establish, and the bill did not discuss funding beyond a mention of initial <br />grant funding. She believed the bill could potentially affect the 9-1-1 Fund and no staff was proposed for <br />addition, so the same staff would be responsible at the State for managing the system. The time needed to <br />establish a system and maintain it was significant. She said the idea was a very good one. Mr. Pap6 <br />thought it might help Eugene with some of its homeless issues. He asked if the information that would be <br />available through a 2-1-1 number was already available in one place. Ms. Wilde said that what was <br />proposed was already being done locally with a seven-digit number. Mr. Pap6 had no objection to the status <br />assigned the bill. <br /> <br />HJR 0039 <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman said she thought the City was required to redistrict after each census. Ms. Feldman said the <br />bill created a new commission to oversee districting rather than a new requirement for redistricting. Staff <br />had recommended a neutral position. Mr. Heuser did not think the bill would make further progress. <br /> <br /> Ms. Bettman, seconded by Ms. Taylor, moved to change the status of the bill to Oppose. <br /> The motion passed unanimously. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Council Committee on INtergovernmental Relations April 28, 2005 Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br />