01/28/1991 Meeting (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e Capital Improvement Program for FY91-92 through FY96-97, in- corporating amendments recommended by the Planning Commission as noted on Errata Sheet A. Ms. Bascom said that the motion does not deal with the issues discussed this evening. Recognizing that the Valley River traffic problem is very broad and should be analyzed prior to making a final decision, she submitted the fol- lowing amendment: Ms. Bascom moved, seconded by Mr. Robinette, to amend the motion to replace the proposed Valley River Bridge study list- ed in the CIP with a comprehensive study of Goodpasture Island Road access. e Ms. Ehrman asked whether a redefined study such as the one that Ms. Bascom is suggesting would include an EIS. In response, Christine Andersen, Public Works Director, said that the scope of the study being suggested by Ms. Bascom would be larger than traditional EIS studies. It would require a review of TransPlan and would include a thorough analysis of alternative modes of transportation. Environmental impacts would be analyzed, but an EIS would not be undertaken as part of the comprehensive study. Responding to a question from Ms. Bascom, Ms. Andersen said that Beltline, 1-105, and the Ferry Street Bridge would be included as part of the area of impact. The State would be involved in these discussions. Mr. Boles said he cannot support the motion for this study because the impli- cations and consequences of undertaking such a study are unclear, particular- ly with respect to the private sector, which is expected to contribute fund- ing resources. Mr. MacDonald said that that City needs a comprehensive study of traffic flow in the Goodpasture Island area. Responding to a question from Mr. Nicholson, Mr. Reinhard said that the Val- ley River Bridge study is included in the long-range section of TransPlan. TransPlan indicates that an Environmental Assessment would have to be con- ducted prior to deciding on the need or location of a bridge. Mr. Gleason pointed out that while the private sector was planning to partic- ipate in funding of the study, it is unclear whether it will still be willing to participate financially now that the nature of the study has changed. Mr. Nicholson expressed concern with the process by which this issue has reached the council. He stated that a comprehensive TransPlan analysis should be conducted prior to making any decision. Mr. Green commented on the significant congestion problem that exists during peak traffic areas in Valley River and pointed out the ramifications of such congestion in terms of willingness to pay. He disagreed with those who feel that helping Valley River Center merchants would only harm downtown and e MINUTES--Eugene City Council January 28, 1991 Page 9